Microbial metabolic traits drive the differential contribution of microbial necromass to soil organic carbon between the rhizosphere of absorptive roots and transport roots

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109529
Qitong Wang , Jipeng Wang , Ziliang Zhang , Min Li , Dungang Wang , Peipei Zhang , Na Li , Huajun Yin
{"title":"Microbial metabolic traits drive the differential contribution of microbial necromass to soil organic carbon between the rhizosphere of absorptive roots and transport roots","authors":"Qitong Wang ,&nbsp;Jipeng Wang ,&nbsp;Ziliang Zhang ,&nbsp;Min Li ,&nbsp;Dungang Wang ,&nbsp;Peipei Zhang ,&nbsp;Na Li ,&nbsp;Huajun Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rhizosphere is a typical soil microbial hotspot, however, not a homogeneous entity. Due to root functional differentiation, different root functional modules (i.e., absorptive roots and transport roots) can play distinct roles in microbial necromass formation and subsequent soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration by influencing microbial metabolic activity in the surrounding soil. Yet, how microbial metabolic traits mediated by different root functional modules regulate the accumulation of microbial necromass C (MNC) in the rhizosphere remains poorly understood. Herein, we quantified and compared the differences in the contribution of MNC to SOC between the rhizosphere of two root functional modules, and explored the role of microbial metabolic traits in influencing the contribution of MNC to rhizosphere SOC in different root functional modules in two spruce (<em>Picea asperata</em> Mast.) plantations. Our findings revealed that absorptive roots exhibited a significantly higher contribution of MNC to SOC (32.9-37.5%) compared to transport roots (27.7-30.5%) in the rhizosphere. This suggests that absorptive roots possess a greater ability to promote MNC accumulation in the rhizosphere than transport roots. This observation was mainly attributed to the difference in the trade-offs between microbial growth and investment traits between the two root functional modules. Specifically, the rhizosphere of absorptive roots had greater microbial C use efficiency (CUE), faster growth and turnover rates, lower respiratory quotients and biomass-specific enzyme activity than did those of transport roots, suggesting that absorptive roots support greater microbial growth yields and subsequently greater necromass production. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that the contribution of MNC to SOC in the rhizosphere largely depends on the trade-offs of microbial metabolic traits mediated by root functional differentiation. Our study also provides novel and direct empirical evidence supporting the need to integrate function-based fine root classifications with the different contributions of MNC to SOC sequestration in the rhizosphere into land surface models of C cycling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071724002189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rhizosphere is a typical soil microbial hotspot, however, not a homogeneous entity. Due to root functional differentiation, different root functional modules (i.e., absorptive roots and transport roots) can play distinct roles in microbial necromass formation and subsequent soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration by influencing microbial metabolic activity in the surrounding soil. Yet, how microbial metabolic traits mediated by different root functional modules regulate the accumulation of microbial necromass C (MNC) in the rhizosphere remains poorly understood. Herein, we quantified and compared the differences in the contribution of MNC to SOC between the rhizosphere of two root functional modules, and explored the role of microbial metabolic traits in influencing the contribution of MNC to rhizosphere SOC in different root functional modules in two spruce (Picea asperata Mast.) plantations. Our findings revealed that absorptive roots exhibited a significantly higher contribution of MNC to SOC (32.9-37.5%) compared to transport roots (27.7-30.5%) in the rhizosphere. This suggests that absorptive roots possess a greater ability to promote MNC accumulation in the rhizosphere than transport roots. This observation was mainly attributed to the difference in the trade-offs between microbial growth and investment traits between the two root functional modules. Specifically, the rhizosphere of absorptive roots had greater microbial C use efficiency (CUE), faster growth and turnover rates, lower respiratory quotients and biomass-specific enzyme activity than did those of transport roots, suggesting that absorptive roots support greater microbial growth yields and subsequently greater necromass production. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that the contribution of MNC to SOC in the rhizosphere largely depends on the trade-offs of microbial metabolic traits mediated by root functional differentiation. Our study also provides novel and direct empirical evidence supporting the need to integrate function-based fine root classifications with the different contributions of MNC to SOC sequestration in the rhizosphere into land surface models of C cycling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微生物代谢特征促使吸收根和运输根的根圈微生物坏死物对土壤有机碳的贡献不同
根瘤菌圈是一个典型的土壤微生物热点,但并不是一个单一的实体。由于根系的功能分化,不同的根系功能模块(即吸收根和运输根)可以通过影响周围土壤中的微生物代谢活动,在微生物坏死物质的形成和随后的土壤有机碳(SOC)固存中发挥不同的作用。然而,人们对不同根系功能模块介导的微生物代谢特征如何调节根瘤菌圈中微生物坏死物质 C(MNC)的积累仍然知之甚少。在本文中,我们量化并比较了两种根系功能模块根圈中 MNC 对 SOC 贡献的差异,并探讨了两种云杉(Picea asperata Mast.)种植园中不同根系功能模块的微生物代谢特征对 MNC 对根圈 SOC 贡献的影响作用。我们的研究结果表明,与根圈中的运输根(27.7-30.5%)相比,吸收根的 MNC 对 SOC 的贡献率(32.9-37.5%)明显更高。这表明,吸收根比运输根更有能力促进根圈中 MNC 的积累。这一观察结果主要归因于两种根系功能模块在微生物生长和投资性状之间的权衡差异。具体来说,与运输根相比,吸收根的根圈具有更高的微生物碳利用效率(CUE)、更快的生长速度和周转速度、更低的呼吸商数和生物质特异性酶活性,这表明吸收根支持更高的微生物生长产量,从而产生更多的坏死物质。总之,我们的研究结果表明,MNC 对根圈 SOC 的贡献在很大程度上取决于根系功能分化介导的微生物代谢特征的权衡。我们的研究还提供了新颖而直接的经验证据,证明有必要将基于功能的细根分类与 MNC 对根圈 SOC 固碳的不同贡献整合到陆地表面的碳循环模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Cropping systems and ecological groups of soil animals jointly affect the transfer of root-derived carbon and mineral nitrogen into the soil food web How to produce an effective manuscript: further perspectives from the Editors-in-Chief of Soil Biology and Biochemistry Plant community composition and traits modulate the impacts of drought intensity on soil microbial community composition and function Reduction of forest soil biota impacts tree performance but not greenhouse gas fluxes Natural seasonal freeze-thaw processes influenced soil quality in alpine grasslands: Insights from soil functions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1