Deprescribing for older adults during acute care admission: a scoping review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00406
Erika Sprake, Janice Kung, Michelle Graham, Ross Tsuyuki, William Gibson
{"title":"Deprescribing for older adults during acute care admission: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Erika Sprake, Janice Kung, Michelle Graham, Ross Tsuyuki, William Gibson","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to understand the current body of knowledge regarding deprescribing in adults aged 60 and over in acute care settings, including the deprescribing activities that are being undertaken, and the feasibility, challenges, and outcomes of the practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Polypharmacy is prevalent amongst older adults, despite risks to patients. Much of the existing research on deprescribing has occurred in the outpatient context, with recent research emerging on the unique opportunity that acute care may provide.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include deprescribing in adults aged 60 and older in acute care. It will consider deprescribing occurring during inpatient admission and at the time of discharge from hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI method for scoping reviews will guide this review. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Database will be undertaken from inception to present with no language restrictions. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies, clinical practice guidelines, and opinion papers will be considered for inclusion. Systematic reviews and scoping reviews will be excluded. Google Scholar and a general Google search will be conducted for gray literature. Two reviewers will assess articles for inclusion and any disagreements will be discussed and resolved by discussion or a third reviewer, if required. Findings will be presented in the scoping review using a narrative approach with supporting quantitative data in a tabular format according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR).</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/pb7aw/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to understand the current body of knowledge regarding deprescribing in adults aged 60 and over in acute care settings, including the deprescribing activities that are being undertaken, and the feasibility, challenges, and outcomes of the practice.

Introduction: Polypharmacy is prevalent amongst older adults, despite risks to patients. Much of the existing research on deprescribing has occurred in the outpatient context, with recent research emerging on the unique opportunity that acute care may provide.

Inclusion criteria: This review will include deprescribing in adults aged 60 and older in acute care. It will consider deprescribing occurring during inpatient admission and at the time of discharge from hospital.

Methods: The JBI method for scoping reviews will guide this review. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Database will be undertaken from inception to present with no language restrictions. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies, clinical practice guidelines, and opinion papers will be considered for inclusion. Systematic reviews and scoping reviews will be excluded. Google Scholar and a general Google search will be conducted for gray literature. Two reviewers will assess articles for inclusion and any disagreements will be discussed and resolved by discussion or a third reviewer, if required. Findings will be presented in the scoping review using a narrative approach with supporting quantitative data in a tabular format according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR).

Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/pb7aw/.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性病入院期间老年人的去处方化:范围界定审查协议。
目的本范围综述旨在了解当前有关急症护理环境中 60 岁及以上成年人去处方化的知识体系,包括正在开展的去处方化活动,以及该做法的可行性、挑战和结果:导言:尽管对患者存在风险,但在老年人中使用多种药物的情况十分普遍。有关去处方化的现有研究大多发生在门诊环境中,而最近的研究则是针对急症护理可能提供的独特机会:本综述将包括急症护理中 60 岁及以上成人的去处方治疗。纳入标准:本综述将包括接受急症护理的 60 岁及以上成年人的去处方化情况,并将考虑住院期间和出院时发生的去处方化情况:方法:采用 JBI 方法进行范围界定审查。方法:本综述将以 JBI 的范围综述方法为指导,检索 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Embase (Ovid) 和 Cochrane 数据库,检索时间从开始到现在,无语言限制。定性、定量和混合方法研究、临床实践指南和意见书都将考虑纳入。系统综述和范围界定综述将被排除在外。将通过 Google Scholar 和普通 Google 搜索灰色文献。两位审稿人将对纳入的文章进行评估,如有任何分歧,将通过讨论或第三位审稿人(如需要)来解决。研究结果将按照《系统综述和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews)清单(PRISMA-ScR),以叙述的方式在范围界定综述中呈现,并以表格的形式提供支持性定量数据:开放科学框架 https://osf.io/pb7aw/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review. Parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children: a qualitative systematic review. Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol. Barriers and facilitators to designing, maintaining, and utilizing rare disease patient registries: a scoping review protocol. Supporting professional practice transition in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1