Access to childhood cancer medicines in South Africa: a health systems analysis of barriers and enablers.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2372033
Iris R Joosse, Hendrika A van den Ham, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, Velisha A Perumal-Pillay, Fatima Suleman
{"title":"Access to childhood cancer medicines in South Africa: a health systems analysis of barriers and enablers.","authors":"Iris R Joosse, Hendrika A van den Ham, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, Velisha A Perumal-Pillay, Fatima Suleman","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2372033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to identify what barriers and facilitators determine current perceived access to childhood cancer care in South Africa through in-depth interviews with stakeholders in South Africa's public and private sectors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 key health system stakeholders, including policy-makers and regulators, medical insurance scheme informants, medicine suppliers, healthcare providers and civil society stakeholders. Identified barriers and facilitators in access to medicines and broader care were structured according to the pharmaceutical value chain (PVC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers and facilitators were identified across all components of the PVC. Key barriers included (1) a lack of political commitment to childhood cancers, (2) discontinuation of essential chemotherapeutics, (3) incomplete insurance coverage for childhood cancers, (4) stock-outs of essential medicines, (5) the inability to access care, including travel to healthcare facilities and (6) low awareness on childhood cancers among primary healthcare (PHC) workers. Proposed priority interventions included pricing flexibilities, increased transparency and consistency in decision-making and healthcare spending, and improved training of PHC staff, nurses and pharmacists on childhood cancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This first comprehensive study of determinants of access to medicines used in childhood cancer in South Africa provides context-specific evidence for targeted policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2372033"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2372033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We sought to identify what barriers and facilitators determine current perceived access to childhood cancer care in South Africa through in-depth interviews with stakeholders in South Africa's public and private sectors.

Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 key health system stakeholders, including policy-makers and regulators, medical insurance scheme informants, medicine suppliers, healthcare providers and civil society stakeholders. Identified barriers and facilitators in access to medicines and broader care were structured according to the pharmaceutical value chain (PVC).

Results: Barriers and facilitators were identified across all components of the PVC. Key barriers included (1) a lack of political commitment to childhood cancers, (2) discontinuation of essential chemotherapeutics, (3) incomplete insurance coverage for childhood cancers, (4) stock-outs of essential medicines, (5) the inability to access care, including travel to healthcare facilities and (6) low awareness on childhood cancers among primary healthcare (PHC) workers. Proposed priority interventions included pricing flexibilities, increased transparency and consistency in decision-making and healthcare spending, and improved training of PHC staff, nurses and pharmacists on childhood cancers.

Conclusion: This first comprehensive study of determinants of access to medicines used in childhood cancer in South Africa provides context-specific evidence for targeted policy development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非儿童癌症药物的获取:对障碍和促进因素的卫生系统分析。
背景我们试图通过对南非公共和私营部门的利益相关者进行深入访谈,找出决定目前南非儿童癌症治疗可及性的障碍和促进因素:对 29 名主要医疗系统利益相关者进行了半结构化定性访谈,其中包括政策制定者和监管者、医疗保险计划信息提供者、药品供应商、医疗服务提供者和民间社会利益相关者。根据医药价值链(PVC)对已确定的获得药品和更广泛医疗服务的障碍和促进因素进行了分析:结果:在医药价值链的各个环节都发现了障碍和促进因素。主要障碍包括:(1) 缺乏对儿童癌症的政治承诺;(2) 基本化疗药物停产;(3) 儿童癌症保险覆盖不全;(4) 基本药物缺货;(5) 无法获得医疗服务,包括无法前往医疗机构;(6) 初级医疗保健人员对儿童癌症的认识不足。建议优先采取的干预措施包括灵活定价、提高决策和医疗支出的透明度和一致性,以及加强对初级卫生保健人员、护士和药剂师进行儿童癌症方面的培训:这是对南非儿童癌症用药获取决定因素的首次全面研究,为有针对性地制定政策提供了具体证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of community pharmacists' experiences and perceptions on gabapentin abuse in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. Assessment of knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of healthcare professionals towards clinical pharmacogenomics implementation in Qatar: a mixed-method study. Exploring Jordanian medical students' perceptions and concerns about ChatGPT in medical education: a cross-sectional study. Pharmaceutical multinational corporations (MNCs) and their exit from low and middle income countries (LMICs): analysing the causes and consequences. Prescriber perceptions of the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin in the acute treatment phase: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1