Economic outcomes from adopting cereal-legume intercropping practices in Sweden

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104064
Gordana Manevska-Tasevska , Vivian Wei Huang , Zhen Chen , Ortrud Jäck , Nasir Adam , Thanh Mai Ha , Martin Weih , Helena Hansson
{"title":"Economic outcomes from adopting cereal-legume intercropping practices in Sweden","authors":"Gordana Manevska-Tasevska ,&nbsp;Vivian Wei Huang ,&nbsp;Zhen Chen ,&nbsp;Ortrud Jäck ,&nbsp;Nasir Adam ,&nbsp;Thanh Mai Ha ,&nbsp;Martin Weih ,&nbsp;Helena Hansson","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>The need for sustainable and resilient farming practices is clearly communicated by the scholars and the European Union policy strategies. The low interest in adopting the practice due to the uncertainties and the variability in the economic outcomes across various intercropping types calls for research attention. In this respect, research is needed to identifying specific intercropping practices that lead to improved farm-level economic outcomes and resilience.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>This study investigates consequences of intercropping adoption on the farm economic outcomes, in the context of achieving economic resilience. Specific objectives are to assess the effect of i) adopting intercropping on the economic outcomes; ii) production adjustments on the economic resilience of the intercropping practices, both in comparison to conventional mono-cropped agriculture.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>The analysis is conducted by using a stochastic partial budgeting model. We use Swedish agriculture as an empirical basis for our study and model two baseline cereal monocropping scenarios and two corresponding alternative (strip and mixed) cereal-legume intercropping scenarios. This is to examine net changes and risk characteristics resulting from the adaptation from monocropping to intercropping production practices. Estimates of net changes and the respective risk characteristics are integrated in an economic resilience assessment for the intercropping practices.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Results reveal that the net economic benefit change from adopting differs across the intercropping alternatives. Prices of the monocropped and the intercropped products of both intercropping alternatives and the use of N fertilizer for the strip intercropping alternative are the most influential factors in determining the adaptability capacity.</p></div><div><h3>CONTRIBUTION</h3><p>This study provides a novel approach that contributes to the literature via quantifying economic resilience capacities of hypothetical technology adoption. The paper presents unique results on the economic resilience of adopting cereal-legume intercropping practices in a Nordic context, giving agriculture in Nordic regions shares common challenges such as short growing season and cold temperature. The results offer valuable insights for extension services in guiding farmers to choose appropriate intercropping practices based on the production possibilities and market needs. Policy implications targeting the adoption of cereal-legume intercropping adoption are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104064"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002142/pdfft?md5=00516e678c49e6b61fdecf122b354d36&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002142-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

The need for sustainable and resilient farming practices is clearly communicated by the scholars and the European Union policy strategies. The low interest in adopting the practice due to the uncertainties and the variability in the economic outcomes across various intercropping types calls for research attention. In this respect, research is needed to identifying specific intercropping practices that lead to improved farm-level economic outcomes and resilience.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates consequences of intercropping adoption on the farm economic outcomes, in the context of achieving economic resilience. Specific objectives are to assess the effect of i) adopting intercropping on the economic outcomes; ii) production adjustments on the economic resilience of the intercropping practices, both in comparison to conventional mono-cropped agriculture.

METHODS

The analysis is conducted by using a stochastic partial budgeting model. We use Swedish agriculture as an empirical basis for our study and model two baseline cereal monocropping scenarios and two corresponding alternative (strip and mixed) cereal-legume intercropping scenarios. This is to examine net changes and risk characteristics resulting from the adaptation from monocropping to intercropping production practices. Estimates of net changes and the respective risk characteristics are integrated in an economic resilience assessment for the intercropping practices.

RESULTS

Results reveal that the net economic benefit change from adopting differs across the intercropping alternatives. Prices of the monocropped and the intercropped products of both intercropping alternatives and the use of N fertilizer for the strip intercropping alternative are the most influential factors in determining the adaptability capacity.

CONTRIBUTION

This study provides a novel approach that contributes to the literature via quantifying economic resilience capacities of hypothetical technology adoption. The paper presents unique results on the economic resilience of adopting cereal-legume intercropping practices in a Nordic context, giving agriculture in Nordic regions shares common challenges such as short growing season and cold temperature. The results offer valuable insights for extension services in guiding farmers to choose appropriate intercropping practices based on the production possibilities and market needs. Policy implications targeting the adoption of cereal-legume intercropping adoption are discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典采用谷物-豆类间作方法的经济效益
内容提要学者们和欧盟的政策战略都明确指出,需要采用可持续和有弹性的耕作方法。由于不确定性和各种间作类型经济结果的差异性,人们对采用这种做法的兴趣不高,这就需要研究人员给予关注。在这方面,有必要开展研究,以确定可提高农场经济效益和抗灾能力的具体间作方法。具体目标是评估 i) 采用间作套种对经济成果的影响;ii) 与传统单一作物农业相比,生产调整对间作套种做法的经济适应性的影响。我们将瑞典农业作为研究的经验基础,并模拟了两种基准谷物单作方案和两种相应的谷物-豆类间作替代方案(条状和混合)。这样做的目的是研究从单一种植到间作套种生产方式的适应所带来的净变化和风险特征。结果表明,采用间作套种的净经济效益变化各不相同。两种间作替代方法的单作物和间作产品的价格以及条状间作替代方法的氮肥使用量是决定适应能力的最大影响因素。由于北欧地区的农业面临着共同的挑战,如生长季节短和气温低,本文就北欧地区采用谷物-豆类间作方法的经济恢复能力提出了独特的结果。研究结果为推广服务提供了宝贵的见解,有助于指导农民根据生产可能性和市场需求选择适当的间作方法。还讨论了针对采用谷物-豆类间作的政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Lowering the greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from grassland-based dairy production The dairy production system in the north of Sweden under possible future food scenarios A pathway for decreasing the water footprint from grazing-based beef production systems in the Tropics How to use residual biomass streams in circular food systems to minimise land use or GHG emissions Win-win or lose-win? Economic-climatic synergies and trade-offs in dual-purpose cattle systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1