Reappraisal of the Cretaceous and Paleogene paleogeography of eastern Amazonia based on systematic paleocurrent measurements

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY Cretaceous Research Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.cretres.2024.105948
Renato Paes de Almeida , Camila Eliza Althaus , Liliane Janikian , Pedro Victor Oliveira Gomes , Felipe Torres Figueiredo , André Oliveira Sawakuchi , Bernardo Tavares Freitas , Leonardo Henrique Gomes da Silva
{"title":"Reappraisal of the Cretaceous and Paleogene paleogeography of eastern Amazonia based on systematic paleocurrent measurements","authors":"Renato Paes de Almeida ,&nbsp;Camila Eliza Althaus ,&nbsp;Liliane Janikian ,&nbsp;Pedro Victor Oliveira Gomes ,&nbsp;Felipe Torres Figueiredo ,&nbsp;André Oliveira Sawakuchi ,&nbsp;Bernardo Tavares Freitas ,&nbsp;Leonardo Henrique Gomes da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.cretres.2024.105948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cretaceous and possibly Paleogene strata, originally defined as the Alter do Chão Formation, are extensively exposed in the Amazonas Basin. While theoretical considerations suggest that the eastern Amazon has been draining into the Atlantic since pre-Miocene times, the limited published field data indicate a significant continental-scale reversal of drainage, transitioning from westward flow during the Cretaceous to the current eastward regional flow. This hypothesis has a significant impact on accepted paleogeographic reconstructions and has implications for the origin of the Amazon River and the associated biotic environments. Nevertheless, the observational database to support that hypothesis is still very scarce. To address this problem, the present study presents data from a basin-transverse profile where the entire stratigraphic succession of Cretaceous and Paleogene ages in the Amazonas Basin is exposed, namely the Jazida da Fazendinha and Alter do Chão formations. Facies analysis of cliff outcrops along the Tapajós River margins, including the type area of the units, reveals associations interpreted as fluvial deposits dominated by sandy bars. Paleocurrents were interpreted from more than 2000 individual measurements of fluvial cross-strata from various stratigraphic levels. The findings indicate that the regional flow direction during the deposition of both units was eastward across the entire basin transect. Integrating our dataset into the existing data on provenance reveals that, unlike the modern Andean-derived system, the primary sources for the Alter do Chão Formation were limited to the Amazon Craton. Our findings offer compelling empirical evidence to support the scenario proposed by previous numerical models. The findings also suggest that the rock record does not support the poorly documented and highly influential model of a significant westward-flowing river in Amazonia during the Cretaceous and the Paleogene.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55207,"journal":{"name":"Cretaceous Research","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 105948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cretaceous Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667124001216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cretaceous and possibly Paleogene strata, originally defined as the Alter do Chão Formation, are extensively exposed in the Amazonas Basin. While theoretical considerations suggest that the eastern Amazon has been draining into the Atlantic since pre-Miocene times, the limited published field data indicate a significant continental-scale reversal of drainage, transitioning from westward flow during the Cretaceous to the current eastward regional flow. This hypothesis has a significant impact on accepted paleogeographic reconstructions and has implications for the origin of the Amazon River and the associated biotic environments. Nevertheless, the observational database to support that hypothesis is still very scarce. To address this problem, the present study presents data from a basin-transverse profile where the entire stratigraphic succession of Cretaceous and Paleogene ages in the Amazonas Basin is exposed, namely the Jazida da Fazendinha and Alter do Chão formations. Facies analysis of cliff outcrops along the Tapajós River margins, including the type area of the units, reveals associations interpreted as fluvial deposits dominated by sandy bars. Paleocurrents were interpreted from more than 2000 individual measurements of fluvial cross-strata from various stratigraphic levels. The findings indicate that the regional flow direction during the deposition of both units was eastward across the entire basin transect. Integrating our dataset into the existing data on provenance reveals that, unlike the modern Andean-derived system, the primary sources for the Alter do Chão Formation were limited to the Amazon Craton. Our findings offer compelling empirical evidence to support the scenario proposed by previous numerical models. The findings also suggest that the rock record does not support the poorly documented and highly influential model of a significant westward-flowing river in Amazonia during the Cretaceous and the Paleogene.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据系统的古海流测量重新评估东亚马孙的白垩纪和古近纪古地理
亚马孙流域广泛出露白垩纪地层,可能还有古近纪地层,最初被定义为 Alter do Chão 地层。虽然理论上亚马孙河东部从上新世时期就开始向大西洋排水,但已公布的有限的实地数据表明,大陆范围内的排水发生了重大逆转,从白垩纪时期的向西流动过渡到目前的向东区域流动。这一假设对公认的古地理重建产生了重大影响,并对亚马逊河的起源及相关的生物环境产生了影响。然而,支持这一假说的观测数据库仍然非常缺乏。为了解决这个问题,本研究提供了一个盆地横剖面的数据,该剖面暴露了亚马孙盆地白垩纪和古近纪的整个地层演替,即 Jazida da Fazendinha 和 Alter do Chão 地层。对塔帕约斯河(Tapajós River)边缘(包括这些单元的类型区)的悬崖露头进行的地貌分析表明,这些地貌被解释为以砂质条石为主的河流沉积物。根据 2000 多次对不同地层的河道横断面的测量,对古生物流进行了解释。研究结果表明,在这两个单元的沉积过程中,整个盆地横断面的区域流向都是向东的。将我们的数据集与现有的产地数据整合后发现,与现代安第斯源系统不同,Alter do Chão Formation 的主要来源仅限于亚马逊克拉通。我们的研究结果提供了令人信服的经验证据,支持以前的数值模型提出的方案。这些发现还表明,岩石记录并不支持白垩纪和古近纪期间亚马孙河大量西流的模型,这种模型的文献记载很少,但影响很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cretaceous Research
Cretaceous Research 地学-地质学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cretaceous Research provides a forum for the rapid publication of research on all aspects of the Cretaceous Period, including its boundaries with the Jurassic and Palaeogene. Authoritative papers reporting detailed investigations of Cretaceous stratigraphy and palaeontology, studies of regional geology, and reviews of recently published books are complemented by short communications of significant new findings. Papers submitted to Cretaceous Research should place the research in a broad context, with emphasis placed towards our better understanding of the Cretaceous, that are therefore of interest to the diverse, international readership of the journal. Full length papers that focus solely on a local theme or area will not be accepted for publication; authors of short communications are encouraged to discuss how their findings are of relevance to the Cretaceous on a broad scale. Research Areas include: • Regional geology • Stratigraphy and palaeontology • Palaeobiology • Palaeobiogeography • Palaeoceanography • Palaeoclimatology • Evolutionary Palaeoecology • Geochronology • Global events.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Reassessment of an azhdarchid pterosaur specimen from the Mifune Group, Upper Cretaceous of Japan Palaeoenvironmental inferences of a Mexican Konservat-Lagerstätte (Tlayúa Quarry; Lower Cretaceous) based on the geochemistry of rare earth elements Selected regular echinoids (Echinoidea) from the upper Campanian–Maastrichtian along the western borders of the Northern Oman Mountains, with description of a new species Persistence of a shallow-marine environment in the western Kunlun area (northwestern Tibet) until the early Maastrichtian: Evidence from radiolitid rudist bivalves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1