Advancing early access policies for innovative cancer drugs: a scoping review and explorative analysis in the Italian setting.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2377697
Margherita d'Errico, Diana Giannarelli, Daniela d'Angela, Carmine Pinto, Barbara Polistena, Federico Spandonaro
{"title":"Advancing early access policies for innovative cancer drugs: a scoping review and explorative analysis in the Italian setting.","authors":"Margherita d'Errico, Diana Giannarelli, Daniela d'Angela, Carmine Pinto, Barbara Polistena, Federico Spandonaro","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2377697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Considering the clinical impact of innovative cancer therapies, policy makers strive to balance timely access and thorough value-assessment. While some European countries promoted early access schemes, Italy does not yet display a consolidated strategy for innovative drugs or for medicines targeting pathologies with a high unmet need.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To better understand the risks and opportunities of early access strategies that could be applied in the Italian setting, we performed a scoping review, searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases and interviewing two field experts. The review results were complemented with an exemplificative quantitative analysis for a subset of innovative oncology drugs, to assess the clinical and economic impact of the price and reimbursement negotiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study suggests that early access schemes developed in Germany and France, combining a free-pricing period, pay-back mechanism, and arbitration, could serve as a basis for developing a feasible strategy in Italy. The quantitative analysis indicated that timely access to innovative drugs could have potentially prevented many cancer progressions, associated with a significant healthcare expenditure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Albeit not allowing to express a conclusive assessment, this study proposes a potential early access strategy for Italy and highlights the need for opening a debate on the opportunities and risks of such schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11251434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2377697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Considering the clinical impact of innovative cancer therapies, policy makers strive to balance timely access and thorough value-assessment. While some European countries promoted early access schemes, Italy does not yet display a consolidated strategy for innovative drugs or for medicines targeting pathologies with a high unmet need.

Methods: To better understand the risks and opportunities of early access strategies that could be applied in the Italian setting, we performed a scoping review, searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases and interviewing two field experts. The review results were complemented with an exemplificative quantitative analysis for a subset of innovative oncology drugs, to assess the clinical and economic impact of the price and reimbursement negotiation.

Results: Our study suggests that early access schemes developed in Germany and France, combining a free-pricing period, pay-back mechanism, and arbitration, could serve as a basis for developing a feasible strategy in Italy. The quantitative analysis indicated that timely access to innovative drugs could have potentially prevented many cancer progressions, associated with a significant healthcare expenditure.

Conclusion: Albeit not allowing to express a conclusive assessment, this study proposes a potential early access strategy for Italy and highlights the need for opening a debate on the opportunities and risks of such schemes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进创新抗癌药物的早期使用政策:在意大利环境下进行的范围界定审查和探索性分析。
导言:考虑到创新癌症疗法的临床影响,政策制定者努力在及时获取和全面价值评估之间取得平衡。虽然一些欧洲国家推广了早期使用计划,但意大利尚未针对创新药物或需求未得到满足的病理药物制定综合战略:为了更好地了解可应用于意大利环境的早期获取战略的风险和机遇,我们进行了一次范围界定审查,搜索了 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库,并采访了两位领域专家。除了综述结果,我们还对部分创新肿瘤药物进行了示范性定量分析,以评估价格和报销谈判的临床和经济影响:我们的研究表明,德国和法国制定的早期使用计划结合了自由定价期、回报机制和仲裁,可作为意大利制定可行战略的基础。定量分析结果表明,及时获得创新药物有可能避免许多癌症的恶化,从而节省大量医疗开支:本研究提出了一项潜在的意大利早期用药战略,并强调有必要就此类计划的机遇和风险展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association of anxiolytic drugs with Torsade de Pointes: a pharmacovigilance study of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Factors influencing healthcare providers' behaviours in deprescribing: a cross-sectional study. Good manufacturing practice inspections conducted by Tanzania medicines and medical devices authority: a comparative study of two fiscal years from 2018 to 2020. Unused medicine take-back programmes: a systematic review. Community pharmacy & primary care integration: qualitative study on stakeholders' opinions and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1