Organizational scaling, scalability, and scale-up: Definitional harmonization and a research agenda

IF 7.7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Venturing Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106419
Nicole Coviello , Erkko Autio , Satish Nambisan , Holger Patzelt , Llewellyn D.W. Thomas
{"title":"Organizational scaling, scalability, and scale-up: Definitional harmonization and a research agenda","authors":"Nicole Coviello ,&nbsp;Erkko Autio ,&nbsp;Satish Nambisan ,&nbsp;Holger Patzelt ,&nbsp;Llewellyn D.W. Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concepts of ‘scaling,’ ‘scalability,’ and ‘scale-up’ are increasingly used in business research and practice. However, the literature reveals a range of definitions for each, and often, their meanings are only implied. This diminishes the ability to build cumulative and meaningful insight - and conduct research - on each concept. In this editorial, we offer a systematic review that assesses and harmonizes prior definitions of these important concepts. This allows us to define and differentiate between (a) scaling as an organizational process, (b) scalability as an ordinary organizational capability, and (c) scale-up as a phase of organizational development. Complementing and extending existing scholarly work, we develop a rich agenda for scaling-related research in entrepreneurship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"39 5","pages":"Article 106419"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902624000417/pdfft?md5=67e3dd41502d028f5bf9f3f586c260f7&pid=1-s2.0-S0883902624000417-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902624000417","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concepts of ‘scaling,’ ‘scalability,’ and ‘scale-up’ are increasingly used in business research and practice. However, the literature reveals a range of definitions for each, and often, their meanings are only implied. This diminishes the ability to build cumulative and meaningful insight - and conduct research - on each concept. In this editorial, we offer a systematic review that assesses and harmonizes prior definitions of these important concepts. This allows us to define and differentiate between (a) scaling as an organizational process, (b) scalability as an ordinary organizational capability, and (c) scale-up as a phase of organizational development. Complementing and extending existing scholarly work, we develop a rich agenda for scaling-related research in entrepreneurship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织规模、可扩展性和扩大规模:定义统一与研究议程
在商业研究和实践中,"扩展"、"可扩展性 "和 "扩展 "的概念越来越多地被使用。然而,从文献中可以看出,每种概念都有一系列定义,而且其含义往往只是隐含的。这就削弱了对每个概念积累有意义的见解和开展研究的能力。在这篇社论中,我们对这些重要概念的先前定义进行了评估和协调,并提供了系统性回顾。这使我们能够定义和区分 (a) 作为组织过程的扩展,(b) 作为普通组织能力的可扩展性,以及 (c) 作为组织发展阶段的扩展。作为对现有学术工作的补充和扩展,我们为创业中与扩展相关的研究制定了丰富的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
59
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Venturing: Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Finance, Innovation and Regional Development serves as a scholarly platform for the exchange of valuable insights, theories, narratives, and interpretations related to entrepreneurship and its implications. With a focus on enriching the understanding of entrepreneurship in its various manifestations, the journal seeks to publish papers that (1) draw from the experiences of entrepreneurs, innovators, and their ecosystem; and (2) tackle issues relevant to scholars, educators, facilitators, and practitioners involved in entrepreneurship. Embracing diversity in approach, methodology, and disciplinary perspective, the journal encourages contributions that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in entrepreneurship and its associated domains.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking entrepreneurship in causally entangled crises: A poly-crisis perspective Amplifying angels: Evidence from the INVEST program False signaling by platform team members and post-campaign venture outcomes: Evidence from an equity crowdfunding platform Funding-source-induced bias: How social ties influence entrepreneurs' anticipated guilt and risk-taking preferences Effect of venture capital investment horizon on new product development: Evidence from the medical device sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1