Journal club

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Thorax Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-222131
Zin Nge Nge Sein
{"title":"Journal club","authors":"Zin Nge Nge Sein","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment recommendations for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) have changed significantly in recent years. The latest guideline by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) has shifted towards ambulatory and conservative management, following the publication of two robust randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Keijzers and colleagues have published a further post-hoc analysis from one of these RCTs, demonstrating that conservative management can safely treat a large primary spontaneous pneumothorax (European Respiratory Journal, 2024; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00429–2024). This study used the Collins method to determine the size of the pneumothorax. Patients with a sum of interpleural distance>16 cm, equating to≥80% collapse, were defined as having large/complete collapse, and patients with an interpleural distance of 6–16 cm, equating to 32–80% as having medium (<80%) collapse. The primary outcome for conservative vs intervention (radiographic resolution at 8 weeks) was 71% vs 95% in large/complete, and 87% vs 93% in medical-sized pneumothorax (OR 1.8 vs 4.5, P-interaction: 0.10). Adverse events were higher with intervention (41/154) than with conservative (13/162) management, but where not statistically significantly different based on pneumothorax size. This study showed that most patients with a large/complete pneumothorax allocated to conservative management recovered symptomatically and radiographically with shorter hospital length of stay (0.8 …","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222131","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment recommendations for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) have changed significantly in recent years. The latest guideline by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) has shifted towards ambulatory and conservative management, following the publication of two robust randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Keijzers and colleagues have published a further post-hoc analysis from one of these RCTs, demonstrating that conservative management can safely treat a large primary spontaneous pneumothorax (European Respiratory Journal, 2024; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00429–2024). This study used the Collins method to determine the size of the pneumothorax. Patients with a sum of interpleural distance>16 cm, equating to≥80% collapse, were defined as having large/complete collapse, and patients with an interpleural distance of 6–16 cm, equating to 32–80% as having medium (<80%) collapse. The primary outcome for conservative vs intervention (radiographic resolution at 8 weeks) was 71% vs 95% in large/complete, and 87% vs 93% in medical-sized pneumothorax (OR 1.8 vs 4.5, P-interaction: 0.10). Adverse events were higher with intervention (41/154) than with conservative (13/162) management, but where not statistically significantly different based on pneumothorax size. This study showed that most patients with a large/complete pneumothorax allocated to conservative management recovered symptomatically and radiographically with shorter hospital length of stay (0.8 …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
期刊俱乐部
近年来,原发性自发性气胸(PSP)的治疗建议发生了很大变化。在两项可靠的随机对照试验(RCT)发表后,英国胸科学会(BTS)的最新指南已转向非卧床保守治疗。Keijzers 及其同事发表了对其中一项随机对照试验的进一步事后分析,证明保守治疗可以安全地治疗大面积原发性自发性气胸(《欧洲呼吸杂志》,2024 年;DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00429-2024)。这项研究采用柯林斯法确定气胸的大小。胸膜间距离总和>16厘米(相当于塌陷≥80%)的患者被定义为大/完全塌陷,胸膜间距离为6-16厘米(相当于32-80%)的患者被定义为中等(<80%)塌陷。保守治疗与干预治疗的主要结果(8周时的放射学分辨率)分别为:大型/完全型气胸的71%对95%,医源性大型气胸的87%对93%(OR 1.8对4.5,P-交互作用:0.10)。干预治疗的不良事件发生率(41/154)高于保守治疗的不良事件发生率(13/162),但根据气胸大小的不同,不良事件发生率在统计学上没有显著差异。这项研究表明,大多数接受保守治疗的大气胸/完全性气胸患者在症状和影像学方面都得到了恢复,住院时间更短(0.8 天)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thorax
Thorax 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
197
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Journal club Harm from tobacco: a common thread Pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer: an analysis of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the National Cancer Registration Dataset Journal club Consolidation with pseudocavitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1