Gamification as a panacea to workplace cyberloafing: an application of self-determination and social bonding theories

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Internet Research Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1108/intr-07-2023-0558
K.S. Nivedhitha, Gayathri Giri, Palvi Pasricha
{"title":"Gamification as a panacea to workplace cyberloafing: an application of self-determination and social bonding theories","authors":"K.S. Nivedhitha, Gayathri Giri, Palvi Pasricha","doi":"10.1108/intr-07-2023-0558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Gamification has been constantly demonstrated as an effective mechanism for employee engagement. However, little is known about how gamification reduces cyberloafing and the mechanism by which it affects cyberloafing in the workplace. This study draws inspiration from self-determination and social bonding theories to explain how game dynamics, namely, personalised challenges, social interactivity and progression status, enhance tacit knowledge sharing behaviour, which, in turn, reduces cyberloafing. In addition, the study also examines the negative moderating effect of fear of failure on the positive relationship between game dynamics and tacit knowledge sharing.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using a sample of 250 employees from information technology organisations, the study employed a 3-wave study to examine the conditional indirect effects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results ascertain that tacit knowledge sharing plays a central role in the relationship between gamification and cyberloafing. Further, game dynamics positively influenced tacit knowledge sharing, which in turn reduced cyberloafing. Especially, social interactivity and progression status greatly reduced cyberloafing behaviour when the fear of failure was low.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study is one of the initial studies that suggest gamification as a progressive tool to reduce workplace cyberloafing behaviours. It utilises a problematisation approach to analyse and criticise the in-house assumptions regarding cyberloafing prevention measures. Further, the study proposes a conceptual model explaining the link between gamification and cyberloafing through alternate assumptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-07-2023-0558","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Gamification has been constantly demonstrated as an effective mechanism for employee engagement. However, little is known about how gamification reduces cyberloafing and the mechanism by which it affects cyberloafing in the workplace. This study draws inspiration from self-determination and social bonding theories to explain how game dynamics, namely, personalised challenges, social interactivity and progression status, enhance tacit knowledge sharing behaviour, which, in turn, reduces cyberloafing. In addition, the study also examines the negative moderating effect of fear of failure on the positive relationship between game dynamics and tacit knowledge sharing.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a sample of 250 employees from information technology organisations, the study employed a 3-wave study to examine the conditional indirect effects.

Findings

The results ascertain that tacit knowledge sharing plays a central role in the relationship between gamification and cyberloafing. Further, game dynamics positively influenced tacit knowledge sharing, which in turn reduced cyberloafing. Especially, social interactivity and progression status greatly reduced cyberloafing behaviour when the fear of failure was low.

Originality/value

This study is one of the initial studies that suggest gamification as a progressive tool to reduce workplace cyberloafing behaviours. It utilises a problematisation approach to analyse and criticise the in-house assumptions regarding cyberloafing prevention measures. Further, the study proposes a conceptual model explaining the link between gamification and cyberloafing through alternate assumptions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游戏化是解决工作场所网络休闲问题的灵丹妙药:自我决定和社会联系理论的应用
目的游戏化一直被证明是促进员工参与的有效机制。然而,人们对游戏化如何减少工作场所中的网络游离现象以及游戏化影响网络游离现象的机制却知之甚少。本研究从自我决定理论和社会纽带理论中汲取灵感,解释游戏动态,即个性化挑战、社会互动性和进步状态,如何增强隐性知识共享行为,进而减少网络闲散。此外,本研究还探讨了失败恐惧对游戏动态与隐性知识共享之间正向关系的负向调节作用。研究结果研究结果表明,隐性知识共享在游戏化与网络游离之间的关系中起着核心作用。此外,游戏动态对隐性知识共享产生了积极影响,而隐性知识共享反过来又减少了网络游离现象。特别是,当对失败的恐惧程度较低时,社交互动和进步状态大大减少了网络逃避行为。 原创性/价值 本研究是建议将游戏化作为减少工作场所网络逃避行为的进步工具的初步研究之一。研究采用问题化方法,分析并批评了有关网络违规预防措施的内部假设。此外,研究还提出了一个概念模型,通过其他假设来解释游戏化与网络游戏之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
期刊最新文献
The OPAD-perception framework: measuring perceptions of online personalized advertising Unpacking the association between social media use and support for unlawful behaviors in protests: a study in Hong Kong Corporate social and digital responsibility in esports Blockchain for sustainable consumption: an affordance and consumer value-based view Together we can do it! A roadmap to effectively tackle propaganda-related tasks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1