Independent Factors Influencing Changes in Baroreceptor Sensitivity after Carotid Endarterectomy

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.008
{"title":"Independent Factors Influencing Changes in Baroreceptor Sensitivity after Carotid Endarterectomy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a well-established standard therapy for patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. The aim of carotid endarterectomy is to decrease the risk of stroke and avoid relevant functional loss. However, carotid endarterectomy is known to be associated with hemodynamic dysregulation. In this study we compared eversion CEA (E-CEA) and conventional CEA (C-CEA) regarding postoperative blood pressure values as well as preoperative and postoperative baroreceptor sensitivity in the first 7 days after surgery. The aim was to find possible factors influencing changes in baroreceptor sensitivity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients (111 patients were enrolled, of which 50 patients received C-CEA and 61 patients E-CEA) were prospectively enrolled in this study. For the measurement of baroreceptor sensitivity, a noninvasive Finometer measuring device from Finapres Medical System B.V. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was used. Measurements were performed 1 day before surgery (PRE), directly after surgery (F1), on day 1 (F2), day 2 (F3), and on day 7 (F4) postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Postoperative blood pressure values were significantly higher in the E-CEA group on the day of surgery (F1) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and on day 1 (F2) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). From day 2 (F3, F4) postoperatively, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups. The invasive blood pressure measurement in the postoperative recovery room showed significantly higher systolic blood pressure values in the E-CEA group (<em>P</em> = 0.001). The need of acute antihypertensive therapy was significantly higher in the recovery room in the E-CEA group (<em>P</em> = 0.020). With regard to changes in baroreceptor sensitivity, significantly lower baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) values were recorded in the E-CEA group at 1 day (F2) postoperatively (<em>P</em> = 0.005). The regression analysis showed that the applied surgical technique and the patient’s age were significant factors influencing changes in baroreceptor sensitivity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this study we could confirm higher blood pressure levels after E-CEA in the first 2 days after surgery. Additionally, we identified 22 factors possibly influencing baroreceptor sensitivity: surgical technique and age. Based on the data obtained in this study, hemodynamic dysregulation after CEA (E-CEA, C-CEA) is temporary and short-term. Already after the second postoperative day, there was no significant difference between the E-CEA and E-CEA groups, this effect remained stable after 7 days.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624004035/pdfft?md5=d373094914e45cd0490fe414d7391885&pid=1-s2.0-S0890509624004035-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624004035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a well-established standard therapy for patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. The aim of carotid endarterectomy is to decrease the risk of stroke and avoid relevant functional loss. However, carotid endarterectomy is known to be associated with hemodynamic dysregulation. In this study we compared eversion CEA (E-CEA) and conventional CEA (C-CEA) regarding postoperative blood pressure values as well as preoperative and postoperative baroreceptor sensitivity in the first 7 days after surgery. The aim was to find possible factors influencing changes in baroreceptor sensitivity.

Methods

Patients (111 patients were enrolled, of which 50 patients received C-CEA and 61 patients E-CEA) were prospectively enrolled in this study. For the measurement of baroreceptor sensitivity, a noninvasive Finometer measuring device from Finapres Medical System B.V. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was used. Measurements were performed 1 day before surgery (PRE), directly after surgery (F1), on day 1 (F2), day 2 (F3), and on day 7 (F4) postoperatively.

Results

Postoperative blood pressure values were significantly higher in the E-CEA group on the day of surgery (F1) (P < 0.001) and on day 1 (F2) (P < 0.001). From day 2 (F3, F4) postoperatively, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups. The invasive blood pressure measurement in the postoperative recovery room showed significantly higher systolic blood pressure values in the E-CEA group (P = 0.001). The need of acute antihypertensive therapy was significantly higher in the recovery room in the E-CEA group (P = 0.020). With regard to changes in baroreceptor sensitivity, significantly lower baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) values were recorded in the E-CEA group at 1 day (F2) postoperatively (P = 0.005). The regression analysis showed that the applied surgical technique and the patient’s age were significant factors influencing changes in baroreceptor sensitivity.

Conclusions

In this study we could confirm higher blood pressure levels after E-CEA in the first 2 days after surgery. Additionally, we identified 22 factors possibly influencing baroreceptor sensitivity: surgical technique and age. Based on the data obtained in this study, hemodynamic dysregulation after CEA (E-CEA, C-CEA) is temporary and short-term. Already after the second postoperative day, there was no significant difference between the E-CEA and E-CEA groups, this effect remained stable after 7 days.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响颈动脉内膜剥脱术后气压感受器敏感性变化的独立因素。
目的:颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)是治疗有症状或无症状颈动脉高度狭窄患者的一种行之有效的标准疗法。颈动脉内膜切除术的目的是降低中风风险,避免相关功能丧失。但众所周知,颈动脉内膜切除术与血流动力学失调有关。在这项研究中,我们比较了颈动脉内膜剥脱术(E-CEA)和传统颈动脉内膜剥脱术(C-CEA)在术后 7 天内的血压值以及术前和术后巴洛感觉敏感性。目的是找出影响气压感受器敏感性变化的可能因素:本研究对111名患者(其中50名患者接受了C-CEA,61名患者接受了E-CEA)进行了前瞻性登记。气压感受器灵敏度的测量采用了 Finapres Medical System B.V.(荷兰阿姆斯特丹)生产的无创 Finometer 测量设备。测量分别在术前一天(PRE)、术后第一天(F1)、术后第一天(F2)、术后第二天(F3)和术后第七天(F4)进行:结果:E-CEA 组术后血压值在手术当天(F1)明显升高(p):在这项研究中,我们证实了 E-CEA 术后头两天的血压水平较高。此外,我们还发现了两个可能影响气压感受器敏感性的因素:手术技术和年龄。根据本研究获得的数据,CEA(E-CEA、C-CEA)术后血流动力学失调是暂时和短期的。术后第二天,E-CEA 组和 E-CEA 组之间就没有明显差异,7 天后这种影响保持稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents On The Cover Table of Contents On The Cover Aortic Outcome after Implementation of a Treatment Strategy for Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1