Methane-cycling microbial communities from Amazon floodplains and upland forests respond differently to simulated climate change scenarios.

IF 6.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Environmental Microbiome Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1186/s40793-024-00596-z
Júlia B Gontijo, Fabiana S Paula, Wanderlei Bieluczyk, Aline G França, Deisi Navroski, Jéssica A Mandro, Andressa M Venturini, Fernanda O Asselta, Lucas W Mendes, José M S Moura, Marcelo Z Moreira, Klaus Nüsslein, Brendan J M Bohannan, Paul L E Bodelier, Jorge L Mazza Rodrigues, Siu M Tsai
{"title":"Methane-cycling microbial communities from Amazon floodplains and upland forests respond differently to simulated climate change scenarios.","authors":"Júlia B Gontijo, Fabiana S Paula, Wanderlei Bieluczyk, Aline G França, Deisi Navroski, Jéssica A Mandro, Andressa M Venturini, Fernanda O Asselta, Lucas W Mendes, José M S Moura, Marcelo Z Moreira, Klaus Nüsslein, Brendan J M Bohannan, Paul L E Bodelier, Jorge L Mazza Rodrigues, Siu M Tsai","doi":"10.1186/s40793-024-00596-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Seasonal floodplains in the Amazon basin are important sources of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), while upland forests are known for their sink capacity. Climate change effects, including shifts in rainfall patterns and rising temperatures, may alter the functionality of soil microbial communities, leading to uncertain changes in CH<sub>4</sub> cycling dynamics. To investigate the microbial feedback under climate change scenarios, we performed a microcosm experiment using soils from two floodplains (i.e., Amazonas and Tapajós rivers) and one upland forest. We employed a two-factorial experimental design comprising flooding (with non-flooded control) and temperature (at 27 °C and 30 °C, representing a 3 °C increase) as variables. We assessed prokaryotic community dynamics over 30 days using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR. These data were integrated with chemical properties, CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes, and isotopic values and signatures. In the floodplains, temperature changes did not significantly affect the overall microbial composition and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and uptake in response to flooding and non-flooding conditions, respectively, were observed in the floodplain soils. By contrast, in the upland forest, the higher temperature caused a sink-to-source shift under flooding conditions and reduced CH<sub>4</sub> sink capability under dry conditions. The upland soil microbial communities also changed in response to increased temperature, with a higher percentage of specialist microbes observed. Floodplains showed higher total and relative abundances of methanogenic and methanotrophic microbes compared to forest soils. Isotopic data from some flooded samples from the Amazonas river floodplain indicated CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation metabolism. This floodplain also showed a high relative abundance of aerobic and anaerobic CH<sub>4</sub> oxidizing Bacteria and Archaea. Taken together, our data indicate that CH<sub>4</sub> cycle dynamics and microbial communities in Amazonian floodplain and upland forest soils may respond differently to climate change effects. We also highlight the potential role of CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation pathways in mitigating CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in Amazonian floodplains.</p>","PeriodicalId":48553,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiome","volume":"19 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-024-00596-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seasonal floodplains in the Amazon basin are important sources of methane (CH4), while upland forests are known for their sink capacity. Climate change effects, including shifts in rainfall patterns and rising temperatures, may alter the functionality of soil microbial communities, leading to uncertain changes in CH4 cycling dynamics. To investigate the microbial feedback under climate change scenarios, we performed a microcosm experiment using soils from two floodplains (i.e., Amazonas and Tapajós rivers) and one upland forest. We employed a two-factorial experimental design comprising flooding (with non-flooded control) and temperature (at 27 °C and 30 °C, representing a 3 °C increase) as variables. We assessed prokaryotic community dynamics over 30 days using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR. These data were integrated with chemical properties, CH4 fluxes, and isotopic values and signatures. In the floodplains, temperature changes did not significantly affect the overall microbial composition and CH4 fluxes. CH4 emissions and uptake in response to flooding and non-flooding conditions, respectively, were observed in the floodplain soils. By contrast, in the upland forest, the higher temperature caused a sink-to-source shift under flooding conditions and reduced CH4 sink capability under dry conditions. The upland soil microbial communities also changed in response to increased temperature, with a higher percentage of specialist microbes observed. Floodplains showed higher total and relative abundances of methanogenic and methanotrophic microbes compared to forest soils. Isotopic data from some flooded samples from the Amazonas river floodplain indicated CH4 oxidation metabolism. This floodplain also showed a high relative abundance of aerobic and anaerobic CH4 oxidizing Bacteria and Archaea. Taken together, our data indicate that CH4 cycle dynamics and microbial communities in Amazonian floodplain and upland forest soils may respond differently to climate change effects. We also highlight the potential role of CH4 oxidation pathways in mitigating CH4 emissions in Amazonian floodplains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚马逊洪泛平原和高地森林的甲烷循环微生物群落对模拟气候变化情景的反应不同。
亚马逊流域的季节性洪泛平原是甲烷(CH4)的重要来源,而高地森林则以其吸收能力而闻名。气候变化的影响,包括降雨模式的变化和气温的升高,可能会改变土壤微生物群落的功能,从而导致甲烷(CH4)循环动态发生不确定的变化。为了研究气候变化情景下的微生物反馈,我们利用两个洪泛平原(即亚马逊河和塔帕约斯河)和一个高地森林的土壤进行了微观世界实验。我们采用了双因子实验设计,将洪水(与非洪水对照)和温度(27 °C和30 °C,代表温度上升 3 °C)作为变量。我们使用 16S rRNA 基因测序和 qPCR 评估了 30 天内原核生物群落的动态。这些数据与化学特性、甲烷通量、同位素值和特征进行了整合。在洪泛平原,温度变化对整体微生物组成和甲烷通量没有显著影响。在洪泛平原土壤中,观察到了CH4排放和吸收分别对洪水和非洪水条件的响应。与此相反,在高地森林中,较高的温度导致洪水条件下从吸收汇向吸收源转变,并降低了干旱条件下的 CH4 吸收汇能力。高地土壤微生物群落也随着温度的升高而发生变化,观察到更高比例的专性微生物。与森林土壤相比,洪泛平原的产甲烷微生物和甲烷营养微生物的总丰度和相对丰度更高。来自亚马孙河洪泛平原的一些洪泛样本的同位素数据表明了 CH4 氧化代谢作用。该洪泛平原还显示出需氧和厌氧 CH4 氧化细菌和古细菌的相对丰度较高。总之,我们的数据表明,亚马逊洪泛平原和高地森林土壤中的甲烷循环动力学和微生物群落可能会对气候变化的影响做出不同的反应。我们还强调了 CH4 氧化途径在减缓亚马逊洪泛平原 CH4 排放中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Microbiome
Environmental Microbiome Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Microorganisms, omnipresent across Earth's diverse environments, play a crucial role in adapting to external changes, influencing Earth's systems and cycles, and contributing significantly to agricultural practices. Through applied microbiology, they offer solutions to various everyday needs. Environmental Microbiome recognizes the universal presence and significance of microorganisms, inviting submissions that explore the diverse facets of environmental and applied microbiological research.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the biosynthesis potential of permafrost microbiomes. Soil properties drive nitrous oxide accumulation patterns by shaping denitrifying bacteriomes. Metatranscriptomics of microbial biofilm succession on HDPE foil: uncovering plastic-degrading potential in soil communities. Stochasticity-dominated rare fungal endophytes contribute to coexistence stability and saponin accumulation in Panax species. Selenium alters the gene content but not the taxonomic composition of the soil microbiome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1