Trauma patients with metastatic cancer undergoing emergent surgery: A matched cohort analysis

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.005
Matthew Nguyen , Jeffry Nahmias , Oliver S. Eng , Maheswari Senthil , Cristobal Barrios , Matthew Dolich , Michael Lekawa , Areg Grigorian
{"title":"Trauma patients with metastatic cancer undergoing emergent surgery: A matched cohort analysis","authors":"Matthew Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jeffry Nahmias ,&nbsp;Oliver S. Eng ,&nbsp;Maheswari Senthil ,&nbsp;Cristobal Barrios ,&nbsp;Matthew Dolich ,&nbsp;Michael Lekawa ,&nbsp;Areg Grigorian","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is a paucity of literature guiding trauma surgeons in the care of patients with active metastatic cancer (MC). Even less is known regarding outcomes for MC patients requiring emergent surgery after trauma. We hypothesized that trauma patients with active Metastatic Cancer (MC) have an increased mortality rate and undergo increased rates of withdrawal of care (WoC) within 72-hours following emergent operations, compared to similarly matched patients without MC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with active MC at the time of traumatic injury were matched 1:2 against patients without active MC based on demographics, comorbidities, vital signs on admission, and injury profile.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 43,826 patients, 0.2 % had MC. After matching 39 MC patients to 78 without MC, there was no difference in demographics, comorbidities, injury severity score, mechanism of injury, vitals on admission (blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate) and need for blood transfusion (all <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). Compared to patients without MC, patients with MC had higher rates and associated risk of death during index hospitalization (38.5 % vs. 15.2 %, <em>p</em> = 0.005; OR 3.49, CI 1.43–8.51, <em>p</em> = 0.006), as well as a higher rate and associated risk of WoC within 72-hours (12.8 % vs. 1.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.007; OR 11.47, CI 1.29–101.93, <em>p</em> = 0.029).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Trauma patients with MC requiring emergent thoracic or abdominal surgery have a high risk of death and an over ten-fold higher associated risk for WoC within the first three days. In some cases, palliative care consultation should be considered, and counseling should be offered to this high-risk trauma population to enable individualized and patient-centric decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Key message</h3><p>This research highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary team consisting of trauma surgeons, oncologist, and palliative care physicians in caring for the high-risk trauma patients with disseminated cancer requiring urgent surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 184-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001015/pdfft?md5=08d852ce689823b886bcac2a36e4391a&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024001015-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is a paucity of literature guiding trauma surgeons in the care of patients with active metastatic cancer (MC). Even less is known regarding outcomes for MC patients requiring emergent surgery after trauma. We hypothesized that trauma patients with active Metastatic Cancer (MC) have an increased mortality rate and undergo increased rates of withdrawal of care (WoC) within 72-hours following emergent operations, compared to similarly matched patients without MC.

Methods

Patients with active MC at the time of traumatic injury were matched 1:2 against patients without active MC based on demographics, comorbidities, vital signs on admission, and injury profile.

Results

From 43,826 patients, 0.2 % had MC. After matching 39 MC patients to 78 without MC, there was no difference in demographics, comorbidities, injury severity score, mechanism of injury, vitals on admission (blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate) and need for blood transfusion (all p > 0.05). Compared to patients without MC, patients with MC had higher rates and associated risk of death during index hospitalization (38.5 % vs. 15.2 %, p = 0.005; OR 3.49, CI 1.43–8.51, p = 0.006), as well as a higher rate and associated risk of WoC within 72-hours (12.8 % vs. 1.3 %, p = 0.007; OR 11.47, CI 1.29–101.93, p = 0.029).

Conclusion

Trauma patients with MC requiring emergent thoracic or abdominal surgery have a high risk of death and an over ten-fold higher associated risk for WoC within the first three days. In some cases, palliative care consultation should be considered, and counseling should be offered to this high-risk trauma population to enable individualized and patient-centric decisions.

Key message

This research highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary team consisting of trauma surgeons, oncologist, and palliative care physicians in caring for the high-risk trauma patients with disseminated cancer requiring urgent surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受紧急手术的转移性癌症创伤患者:匹配队列分析
背景指导创伤外科医生护理活动性转移性癌症(MC)患者的文献极少。对于创伤后需要紧急手术的转移性癌症患者的治疗效果更是知之甚少。我们假设,与无转移性癌症(MC)的类似配对患者相比,患有活动性转移性癌症(MC)的创伤患者死亡率会增加,并且在急诊手术后 72 小时内的停诊率(WoC)也会增加。方法根据人口统计学、合并症、入院时的生命体征和伤情,将创伤受伤时患有活动性MC的患者与无活动性MC的患者进行1:2配对。将 39 名 MC 患者与 78 名无 MC 患者进行配对后,发现两者在人口统计学、合并症、损伤严重程度评分、损伤机制、入院时生命体征(血压、心率、呼吸频率)和输血需求方面均无差异(所有 p 均为 0.05)。与没有 MC 的患者相比,有 MC 的患者在指数住院期间的死亡率和相关风险更高(38.5 % vs. 15.2 %,p = 0.005;OR 3.49,CI 1.43-8.51,p = 0.006),72 小时内 WoC 的发生率和相关风险也更高(12.结论需要紧急进行胸腔或腹腔手术的 MC 重创患者死亡风险高,前三天内发生 WoC 的相关风险高出十倍以上。在某些情况下,应考虑姑息治疗咨询,并为这一高风险创伤人群提供咨询,以便做出个性化和以患者为中心的决定。这项研究强调了由创伤外科医生、肿瘤科医生和姑息治疗医生组成的多学科团队在护理需要紧急手术的高风险扩散性癌症创伤患者方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Management of Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: A systematic review of national and International Clinical Guidelines (CoSMIC-G) Primary delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: A matched-pair comparison of Roux-en-Y vs. Billroth-II reconstruction Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study Engagement and learning approaches among medical students in an online surgical teaching programme: A cross-sectional study Gender and age specific dynamics of health-related postoperative outcome measures following the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1