Effectiveness of deep dry needling combined with stretching for the treatment of pain in patients with myofascial trigger points: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.07.003
{"title":"Effectiveness of deep dry needling combined with stretching for the treatment of pain in patients with myofascial trigger points: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The combination of dry needling and stretching has been proposed for the treatment of myofascial trigger points (MTPs), but it is not currently known whether the combination of both interventions would be of greater interest than the application of stretching alone. Thus, this systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of deep dry needling with stretching versus stretching alone on pain among patients with MTPs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched to identify studies analysing the effect of deep dry needling in combination with stretching versus stretching alone for the treatment of pain. The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool (RoB2) was used to assess the risk of bias, and the DerSimonian‒Laird method was applied to estimate the pooled standard effect sizes (ESs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review, and their pooled ES for pain was −1.73 (95% CI: −3.06; −0.40). The RoB2 tool revealed that four studies had an unclear risk of bias, and one study had a high risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Adding deep dry needling to stretching for the treatment of MTP may be an effective approach for the treatment of pain in patients with MTPs. Further research is needed to clarify the ideal number of local twitch responses to perform during deep dry needling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003395/pdfft?md5=89ea1c845ffc5584973275d28117fdf0&pid=1-s2.0-S1360859224003395-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The combination of dry needling and stretching has been proposed for the treatment of myofascial trigger points (MTPs), but it is not currently known whether the combination of both interventions would be of greater interest than the application of stretching alone. Thus, this systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of deep dry needling with stretching versus stretching alone on pain among patients with MTPs.

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched to identify studies analysing the effect of deep dry needling in combination with stretching versus stretching alone for the treatment of pain. The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool (RoB2) was used to assess the risk of bias, and the DerSimonian‒Laird method was applied to estimate the pooled standard effect sizes (ESs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results

Five randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review, and their pooled ES for pain was −1.73 (95% CI: −3.06; −0.40). The RoB2 tool revealed that four studies had an unclear risk of bias, and one study had a high risk of bias.

Conclusions

Adding deep dry needling to stretching for the treatment of MTP may be an effective approach for the treatment of pain in patients with MTPs. Further research is needed to clarify the ideal number of local twitch responses to perform during deep dry needling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深层干针疗法结合拉伸疗法治疗肌筋膜触发点患者疼痛的疗效:系统回顾与荟萃分析
目的有人建议将干针疗法和拉伸疗法结合起来治疗肌筋膜触发点(MTPs),但目前尚不清楚这两种干预方法的结合是否比单独应用拉伸疗法更有效。因此,本系统性综述旨在比较深层干针疗法与拉伸疗法对 MTPs 患者疼痛的疗效。方法检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 和 Scopus 数据库,以确定分析深层干针疗法与拉伸疗法结合治疗疼痛效果的研究。结果本系统综述共纳入了五项随机对照试验,其疼痛的汇总效应大小为-1.73(95% CI:-3.06;-0.40)。RoB2工具显示,四项研究的偏倚风险不明确,一项研究的偏倚风险较高。结论在拉伸治疗MTP的基础上增加深层干针疗法可能是治疗MTP患者疼痛的有效方法。需要进一步研究以明确在深层干针疗法中进行局部抽搐反应的理想次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Active versus passive foam rolling on range of motion, tissue property, and neural adaptation in healthy young adults: A randomised controlled trial Investigating physical activity in women with chronic pelvic pain Association between shoulder girdle muscles trigger points and frozen shoulder: A cross-sectional study Runners have more latent myofascial trigger point than non-runners in medialis gastrocnemii The effect of different types of cupping therapy on acute changes in ankle dorsiflexion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1