Prepare for impact of NCAA settlement

Robert Romano J.D., LLM
{"title":"Prepare for impact of NCAA settlement","authors":"Robert Romano J.D., LLM","doi":"10.1002/catl.31342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With previous setbacks in both <i>O’Bannon v. NCAA</i> and <i>NCAA v. Alston</i>, the NCAA and the Power Five conferences made a decision to shy away from their traditional aggressive stance when it came to litigating the latest legal challenge attacking their business model in <i>House v. NCAA</i> (No. 4:20-cv-03919, (N.D. Ca. 06/15/2020)). And so in May, the leaders in the Power Five (American Athletic Conference, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and Southeastern Conference) ended up agreeing to settle the case. The multibillion-dollar settlement, if approved by Senior District Judge Claudia Wilken — the same federal judge associated with both the <i>Alston</i> and <i>O’Bannon</i> cases — obliges the NCAA to pay out approximately $2.8 billion to former student-athletes who had been prohibited from monetizing their name, image, and likeness prior to July 1, 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":100289,"journal":{"name":"College Athletics and the Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College Athletics and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/catl.31342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With previous setbacks in both O’Bannon v. NCAA and NCAA v. Alston, the NCAA and the Power Five conferences made a decision to shy away from their traditional aggressive stance when it came to litigating the latest legal challenge attacking their business model in House v. NCAA (No. 4:20-cv-03919, (N.D. Ca. 06/15/2020)). And so in May, the leaders in the Power Five (American Athletic Conference, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, and Southeastern Conference) ended up agreeing to settle the case. The multibillion-dollar settlement, if approved by Senior District Judge Claudia Wilken — the same federal judge associated with both the Alston and O’Bannon cases — obliges the NCAA to pay out approximately $2.8 billion to former student-athletes who had been prohibited from monetizing their name, image, and likeness prior to July 1, 2021.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准备应对 NCAA 和解的影响
由于之前在 O'Bannon 诉 NCAA 和 NCAA 诉 Alston 案中的挫败,NCAA 和五大联盟决定在最新的 House 诉 NCAA 案(No.4:20-cv-03919, (N.D. Ca. 06/15/2020))中对攻击其商业模式的法律挑战提起诉讼时,放弃其传统的激进立场。因此,今年 5 月,五大联盟(美国体育联盟、12 大联盟、10 大联盟、太平洋 12 大联盟和东南联盟)的领导者最终同意和解。如果高级地区法官克劳迪娅-威尔肯(Claudia Wilken)批准这一数十亿美元的和解协议,NCAA 将向 2021 年 7 月 1 日之前被禁止将其姓名、形象和肖像货币化的前学生运动员支付约 28 亿美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advisory Board members discuss all things NIL Two-Minute Drill Did court find NCAA had duty to protect? Judge rules against student-athlete Learn how to become a supercommunicator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1