Using predictive methods to assess observation and measure importance

William M. Briggs
{"title":"Using predictive methods to assess observation and measure importance","authors":"William M. Briggs","doi":"10.1108/ajeb-05-2024-0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to find suitable replacements for hypothesis testing and variable-importance measures.Design/methodology/approachThis study explores under-used predictive methods.FindingsThe study's hypothesis testing can and should be replaced by predictive methods. It is the only way to know if models have any value.Originality/valueThis is the first time predictive methods have been used to demonstrate measure and variable importance. Hypothesis testing can never prove the goodness of models. Only predictive methods can.","PeriodicalId":504795,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Economics and Banking","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Economics and Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-05-2024-0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to find suitable replacements for hypothesis testing and variable-importance measures.Design/methodology/approachThis study explores under-used predictive methods.FindingsThe study's hypothesis testing can and should be replaced by predictive methods. It is the only way to know if models have any value.Originality/valueThis is the first time predictive methods have been used to demonstrate measure and variable importance. Hypothesis testing can never prove the goodness of models. Only predictive methods can.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用预测方法评估观察结果和衡量重要性
目的本研究旨在为假设检验和变量重要性测量寻找合适的替代方法。研究结果本研究的假设检验可以而且应该被预测方法所取代。这是了解模型是否有价值的唯一方法。原创性/价值这是首次使用预测方法来证明测量和变量的重要性。假设检验永远无法证明模型的优劣。只有预测方法可以。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-selection out of formal credit markets: evidence from rural Vietnam Using predictive methods to assess observation and measure importance Psychological capital: a literature review and research trends Dynamic linkages between the monetary policy variables and stock market in the presence of structural breaks: evidence from India Promoter share pledging and dividend payouts in India: does family involvement matters?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1