Does Online Fundraising Increase Charitable Giving? A Nationwide Field Experiment on Facebook

M. Adena, Anselm Hager
{"title":"Does Online Fundraising Increase Charitable Giving? A Nationwide Field Experiment on Facebook","authors":"M. Adena, Anselm Hager","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4739903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? Using the Facebook advertising tool, we implemented a natural field experiment across Germany, randomly assigning almost 8,000 postal codes to Save the Children fundraising videos or to a pure control. We studied changes in the donation revenue and frequency for Save the Children and other charities by postal code. Our geo-randomized design circumvented many difficulties inherent in studies based on click-through data, especially substitution and measurement issues. We found that (i) video fundraising increased donation revenue and frequency to Save the Children during the campaign and in the subsequent five weeks, that (ii) the campaign was profitable for the fundraiser, and that (iii) the effects were similar independent of video content and impression assignment strategy. However, we also found some crowding out of donations to other similar charities or projects. Finally, we demonstrated that click data may be an inappropriate proxy for donations and recommend that managers use careful experimental designs that can plausibly evaluate the effects of advertising on relevant outcomes. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: M. Adena acknowledges financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Grants 417014946 and CRC TRR 190 (Project 280092119)]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.00596 .","PeriodicalId":21855,"journal":{"name":"SSRN Electronic Journal","volume":"5 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN Electronic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4739903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? Using the Facebook advertising tool, we implemented a natural field experiment across Germany, randomly assigning almost 8,000 postal codes to Save the Children fundraising videos or to a pure control. We studied changes in the donation revenue and frequency for Save the Children and other charities by postal code. Our geo-randomized design circumvented many difficulties inherent in studies based on click-through data, especially substitution and measurement issues. We found that (i) video fundraising increased donation revenue and frequency to Save the Children during the campaign and in the subsequent five weeks, that (ii) the campaign was profitable for the fundraiser, and that (iii) the effects were similar independent of video content and impression assignment strategy. However, we also found some crowding out of donations to other similar charities or projects. Finally, we demonstrated that click data may be an inappropriate proxy for donations and recommend that managers use careful experimental designs that can plausibly evaluate the effects of advertising on relevant outcomes. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: M. Adena acknowledges financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Grants 417014946 and CRC TRR 190 (Project 280092119)]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.00596 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线筹款会增加慈善捐赠吗?Facebook 上的全国性实地实验
网络募捐会增加慈善捐赠吗?利用 Facebook 广告工具,我们在德国各地进行了一次自然现场实验,将近 8000 个邮政编码随机分配给救助儿童会的筹款视频或纯粹的对照组。我们按邮政编码研究了救助儿童会和其他慈善机构的捐赠收入和频率的变化。我们的地理随机设计规避了基于点击数据进行研究的许多固有困难,尤其是替代和测量问题。我们发现:(i) 视频筹款提高了活动期间及随后五周内救助儿童会的捐款收入和捐款频率;(ii) 活动为筹款者带来了利润;(iii) 无论视频内容和印象分配策略如何,效果都相似。不过,我们也发现,对其他类似慈善机构或项目的捐赠也存在一定的挤出效应。最后,我们证明了点击数据可能是捐款的不恰当代表,并建议管理者使用谨慎的实验设计,以合理评估广告对相关结果的影响。本文已被行为经济学与决策分析专业的陈艳接受。资助:M. Adena 感谢德国联邦科学基金会 [Grants 417014946 and CRC TRR 190 (Project 280092119)]的资助。补充材料:在线附录和数据文件可在 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.00596 上获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bailing out the Protester Ships of State and Empty Vessels: Critical Reflections on 'Territorial Status in International Law' Religious Expression and Exemptions in the Private Sector Workplace: Spotting Bias Reform, Not Revolution, is What is Needed Now for Yardstick Competition Influence of Psychological Exchange Rates (PER) on Forex Price Formation: Theory, Empirical, and Experimental Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1