Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs in Peri-Urban Landscapes: Drivers, Governance Obstacles and Improvements

Land Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.3390/land13071061
M. Spyra, Nica Claudia Caló, G. M. Martínez Pastur, María Vanessa Lencinas, Daniele La Rosa
{"title":"Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs in Peri-Urban Landscapes: Drivers, Governance Obstacles and Improvements","authors":"M. Spyra, Nica Claudia Caló, G. M. Martínez Pastur, María Vanessa Lencinas, Daniele La Rosa","doi":"10.3390/land13071061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ESs) manifest when the enhancement of one service leads to the diminishment of another. These trade-offs pose a notable challenge, impacting the sustainability of particular socioecological system peri-urban landscapes (PULs). This issue arises from the dynamic processes associated with peri-urbanization, which threaten natural ecosystems and their services in peri-urban areas. Additionally, the escalating demand for ecosystem services in PULs contributes to these trade-offs. Policymaking and planning concerning ES trade-offs in PULs should prioritize promoting a balance between conflicting services and fostering synergies among them. However, it is noteworthy that ES trade-offs in PULs are not given high priority in policy and planning agendas. Knowledge regarding policy development and planning for ES trade-offs in PULs often remains concealed within specific country and regional case studies. Consequently, this research seeks to characterize the ES trade-offs in selected PUL case studies, with the objective of identifying potential commonalities among them. Furthermore, this study aims to identify (i) the factors driving ES trade-offs, (ii) challenges related to how policymaking and planning address ES trade-offs in PULs, and (iii) recommendations for enhancing governance practices to better manage peri-urban ES trade-offs. We designed a semi-quantitative survey and collected information about 24 case studies located across the world. The answers from this survey were analyzed using principal component analysis. The results showed that the most common trade-offs occurred between “cultural and provisioning” and “regulating and provisioning” ESs. It was found that urban development is the primary driver behind the emergence of the examined trade-offs. To address this issue at the governance level, this study recommends establishing mechanisms to facilitate collaboration among stakeholders. This should be accompanied by robust dissemination efforts and the promotion of awareness among actors regarding the fundamental concepts of ESs and PULs.","PeriodicalId":508186,"journal":{"name":"Land","volume":"72 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ESs) manifest when the enhancement of one service leads to the diminishment of another. These trade-offs pose a notable challenge, impacting the sustainability of particular socioecological system peri-urban landscapes (PULs). This issue arises from the dynamic processes associated with peri-urbanization, which threaten natural ecosystems and their services in peri-urban areas. Additionally, the escalating demand for ecosystem services in PULs contributes to these trade-offs. Policymaking and planning concerning ES trade-offs in PULs should prioritize promoting a balance between conflicting services and fostering synergies among them. However, it is noteworthy that ES trade-offs in PULs are not given high priority in policy and planning agendas. Knowledge regarding policy development and planning for ES trade-offs in PULs often remains concealed within specific country and regional case studies. Consequently, this research seeks to characterize the ES trade-offs in selected PUL case studies, with the objective of identifying potential commonalities among them. Furthermore, this study aims to identify (i) the factors driving ES trade-offs, (ii) challenges related to how policymaking and planning address ES trade-offs in PULs, and (iii) recommendations for enhancing governance practices to better manage peri-urban ES trade-offs. We designed a semi-quantitative survey and collected information about 24 case studies located across the world. The answers from this survey were analyzed using principal component analysis. The results showed that the most common trade-offs occurred between “cultural and provisioning” and “regulating and provisioning” ESs. It was found that urban development is the primary driver behind the emergence of the examined trade-offs. To address this issue at the governance level, this study recommends establishing mechanisms to facilitate collaboration among stakeholders. This should be accompanied by robust dissemination efforts and the promotion of awareness among actors regarding the fundamental concepts of ESs and PULs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市周边景观中的生态系统服务权衡:驱动因素、治理障碍和改进措施
当一种服务的增强导致另一种服务的减少时,生态系统服务(ESs)中的权衡就体现出来了。这些权衡构成了一个显著的挑战,影响着特定社会生态系统城郊景观(PULs)的可持续性。这一问题源于与近郊城市化相关的动态过程,这些过程威胁着近郊地区的自然生态系统及其服务。此外,PULs 中对生态系统服务不断增长的需求也加剧了这些权衡。有关 PULs 中生态系统服务权衡的决策和规划应优先考虑促进相互冲突的服务之间的平衡,并促进它们之间的协同作用。然而,值得注意的是,PULs 中的生态系统服务权衡在政策和规划议程中并未得到高度重视。有关 PULs 中生态系统服务权衡的政策制定和规划方面的知识往往被掩盖在具体的国家和地区案例研究中。因此,本研究试图描述选定的 PUL 案例研究中的生态系统服务权衡特点,目的是确定它们之间潜在的共性。此外,本研究还旨在确定:(i)驱动生态系统服务权衡的因素;(ii)与政策制定和规划如何解决 PULs 中生态系统服务权衡相关的挑战;以及(iii)加强治理实践以更好地管理城郊生态系统服务权衡的建议。我们设计了一项半定量调查,收集了世界各地 24 个案例研究的相关信息。我们采用主成分分析法对调查问卷的答案进行了分析。结果表明,最常见的权衡发生在 "文化和供给 "以及 "调节和供给 "两种生态系统之间。调查还发现,城市发展是造成上述权衡的主要原因。为了在治理层面解决这一问题,本研究建议建立促进利益相关者之间合作的机制。与此同时,应大力开展宣传工作,提高参与者对生态系统服务和 PULs 基本概念的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management Impacts on Non-Native Smooth Brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.) Control in a Native Fescue Grassland in Canada Grassland Ecosystem Services: Their Economic Evaluation through a Systematic Review The Impact of Social Capital on Community Resilience: A Comparative Study of Seven Flood-Prone Communities in Nanjing, China Mapping the Functional Structure of Urban Agglomerations at the Block Level: A New Spatial Classification That Goes Beyond Land Use Per Capita Land Use through Time and Space: A New Database for (Pre)Historic Land-Use Reconstructions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1