Communication Model in Managing Geothermal Power Plant Conflicts on Serang Regency, Indonesia

A. Muldi, Husnan Nurjuman, Naniek Afrilla Framanik, Yayan Saryani
{"title":"Communication Model in Managing Geothermal Power Plant Conflicts on Serang Regency, Indonesia","authors":"A. Muldi, Husnan Nurjuman, Naniek Afrilla Framanik, Yayan Saryani","doi":"10.9734/arjass/2024/v22i7554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The construction of Geothermal Power Plants in several regions in Indonesia is currently always characterized by conflict and opposition from local communities, including in Serang Regency. One of the main issues is the company’s inappropriate communication strategy, resulting in a lack of community acceptance and leading to conflicts. The research focuses on the different stages of conflict, behavior and communication of conflicting parties within managing conflict strategies. Researchers utilize Galtung's conflict model and the convergence-divergence communication theory. \nMethodology: The research method used is qualitative research through the examination of case studies. This was done because the problems in this research remained unclear, holistic, complex, dynamic and full of meaning. Meanwhile, the data collection techniques used in this research were documentation obtained 73 news published by 35 online media covering statistics on yearly citizen actions and newspaper publications, news topics or discussions, and online news coverage on the construction of the Geothermal Power Plant in Serang regency, Indonesia. Also, with direct field observations and in-depth interviews with several informants at the study location. \nResults: Based on research findings, the Geothermal Power Plant conflict went through 4 stages, including the initial conflict phase; conflict phase; the trust-building phase leading to conflict resolution; and the conflict resolution phase. Meanwhile, based on Galtung's theory, conflict occurs when there is a discrepancy between the socialization provided by the company and the community’s direct experiences, leading to rejection through various actions. The divergent communication approach utilized by the company towards the affected communities resulted in different interpretations, ultimately causing the root of the conflict. \nConclusion: The conflict stages in the Geothermal Power Plant development project in Serang regency are divided into several phases that closely related with communication occurred between company, government and the local communities. Lack of communication formed negative opinions about the project developers, leading them to oppose the construction of the Geothermal project. The convergent communication model combined with other communication models such as open, participatory and supportive communication is considered to be highly effective in addressing conflicts.","PeriodicalId":505692,"journal":{"name":"Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences","volume":"50 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2024/v22i7554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The construction of Geothermal Power Plants in several regions in Indonesia is currently always characterized by conflict and opposition from local communities, including in Serang Regency. One of the main issues is the company’s inappropriate communication strategy, resulting in a lack of community acceptance and leading to conflicts. The research focuses on the different stages of conflict, behavior and communication of conflicting parties within managing conflict strategies. Researchers utilize Galtung's conflict model and the convergence-divergence communication theory. Methodology: The research method used is qualitative research through the examination of case studies. This was done because the problems in this research remained unclear, holistic, complex, dynamic and full of meaning. Meanwhile, the data collection techniques used in this research were documentation obtained 73 news published by 35 online media covering statistics on yearly citizen actions and newspaper publications, news topics or discussions, and online news coverage on the construction of the Geothermal Power Plant in Serang regency, Indonesia. Also, with direct field observations and in-depth interviews with several informants at the study location. Results: Based on research findings, the Geothermal Power Plant conflict went through 4 stages, including the initial conflict phase; conflict phase; the trust-building phase leading to conflict resolution; and the conflict resolution phase. Meanwhile, based on Galtung's theory, conflict occurs when there is a discrepancy between the socialization provided by the company and the community’s direct experiences, leading to rejection through various actions. The divergent communication approach utilized by the company towards the affected communities resulted in different interpretations, ultimately causing the root of the conflict. Conclusion: The conflict stages in the Geothermal Power Plant development project in Serang regency are divided into several phases that closely related with communication occurred between company, government and the local communities. Lack of communication formed negative opinions about the project developers, leading them to oppose the construction of the Geothermal project. The convergent communication model combined with other communication models such as open, participatory and supportive communication is considered to be highly effective in addressing conflicts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理印度尼西亚雪朗地区地热发电厂冲突的沟通模式
目的:目前,在印度尼西亚多个地区建设地热发电厂的过程中,总是会与当地社区发生冲突,遭到当地社区的反对,雪朗地区也不例外。其中一个主要问题是公司的沟通策略不当,导致社区不接受并引发冲突。研究重点是冲突的不同阶段、冲突各方在管理冲突策略中的行为和沟通。研究人员采用了 Galtung 的冲突模型和聚合-发散沟通理论。研究方法:采用的研究方法是通过案例研究进行定性研究。这样做的原因是,本研究中的问题仍然是不明确的、整体的、复杂的、动态的和充满意义的。同时,本研究中使用的数据收集技术是通过 35 家网络媒体发布的 73 篇新闻获得的文献资料,内容涵盖每年公民行动和报纸出版物的统计数据、新闻话题或讨论,以及关于印度尼西亚雪兰县地热发电厂建设的网络新闻报道。此外,还在研究地点直接进行了实地观察,并与几位知情者进行了深入访谈。结果:根据研究结果,地热发电厂冲突经历了四个阶段,包括初始冲突阶段、冲突阶段、导致冲突解决的信任建立阶段和冲突解决阶段。同时,根据加尔通(Galtung)的理论,当公司提供的社会化服务与社区的直接经验之间存在差异时,冲突就会发生,并通过各种行动导致排斥。公司对受影响社区采用的不同沟通方式导致了不同的解释,最终造成了冲突的根源。结论:实浪县地热发电厂开发项目的冲突阶段分为几个阶段,这些阶段与公司、政府和当地社区之间的沟通密切相关。缺乏沟通会形成对项目开发商的负面看法,从而导致他们反对地热项目的建设。聚合式沟通模式与其他沟通模式(如开放式、参与式和支持式沟通)相结合,被认为在解决冲突方面非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Covid-19 Anxiety among Students and Teachers and Compliance to Prevention Protocols in Selected Schools in Delta State, Nigeria Communication Model in Managing Geothermal Power Plant Conflicts on Serang Regency, Indonesia Accessing the Influence of Unverified Instagram Blog Content on the Cognitive and Behavioral Pattern of Undergraduates: An Empirical Study of Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) Exploring the Pedagogical Potential of Schenkerian Analysis in Japan: A Case Study on Teaching with Schenkerian Graphs Gender Frames Portrayed in Television Series: Implications towards Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1