The Effectiveness of Zirconia Crowns Versus Metal Crowns in Anterior Teeth: In vitro Study

Abstract

ABSTRACT The selection between Zirconia crowns and metal crowns for anterior teeth restorations is pivotal in prosthodontics due to their distinct properties. However, a comprehensive investigation into their effectiveness in anterior tooth restorations is warranted. This in vitro study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Zirconia crowns and metal crowns in anterior teeth restorations. A total of thirty extracted human maxillary central incisors were prepared to receive crowns and randomly allocated into two groups: group A, zirconia crowns; and group B, metal crowns. The crowns were fabricated following standardized protocols and cemented onto the prepared teeth. Various tests, including fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, and color-matching assessment, were conducted on the samples. The mean fracture resistance of Zirconia crowns (Group A) was determined to be 320 N (SD ± 25), whereas it was 280 N (SD ± 30) for metal crowns (Group B). Marginal adaptation assessment revealed a mean gap width of 50 microns (SD ± 10) for Zirconia crowns and 70 microns (SD ± 15) for metal crowns. Evaluation of color matching showed a higher percentage of acceptable matches for Zirconia crowns compared to metal crowns. Zirconia crowns exhibited superior fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, and color matching in comparison to metal crowns for anterior teeth restorations. These findings advocate for Zirconia crowns as a more effective choice for restoring anterior teeth, offering both strength and esthetic appeal.