How agencies enable and perpetuate the coercive control of women

Amy Beddows, Ankita Mishra
{"title":"How agencies enable and perpetuate the coercive control of women","authors":"Amy Beddows, Ankita Mishra","doi":"10.53841/bpspowe.2024.7.1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the need for a wider understanding of men’s violence against women, specifically coercive control, and the extent to which this far-ranging pattern of domination, exploitation, and dehumanisation is enacted beyond individual abusers. Men who engage in coercive control also manipulate agencies and professionals (in healthcare and criminal justice services as well as other sectors) as another medium through which they can harm their partners. Simultaneously, these agencies enact various forms of control and restriction over women who are trying to access support, mirroring and amplifying men’s abuse and further reducing women’s space for action (Kelly et al, 2014). This enmeshment of abusers and professionals makes it harder for women to escape violence and rebuild their lives, especially women from marginalised backgrounds and minoritised identities.This reflective piece draws on the research and practice experience of its authors to challenge the pervasive misunderstanding of coercive control as an episodic, interpersonal process rather than a course of events (Lombard & Proctor, 2023) which can also be enacted through agencies, institutions, and systems. We argue that professionals can inadvertently be part of the ‘conducive context’ for coercive control (Kelly, 2007), impeding meaningful attempts to address the devastating and widespread impacts of men’s violence against women.","PeriodicalId":498217,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","volume":"5 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspowe.2024.7.1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the need for a wider understanding of men’s violence against women, specifically coercive control, and the extent to which this far-ranging pattern of domination, exploitation, and dehumanisation is enacted beyond individual abusers. Men who engage in coercive control also manipulate agencies and professionals (in healthcare and criminal justice services as well as other sectors) as another medium through which they can harm their partners. Simultaneously, these agencies enact various forms of control and restriction over women who are trying to access support, mirroring and amplifying men’s abuse and further reducing women’s space for action (Kelly et al, 2014). This enmeshment of abusers and professionals makes it harder for women to escape violence and rebuild their lives, especially women from marginalised backgrounds and minoritised identities.This reflective piece draws on the research and practice experience of its authors to challenge the pervasive misunderstanding of coercive control as an episodic, interpersonal process rather than a course of events (Lombard & Proctor, 2023) which can also be enacted through agencies, institutions, and systems. We argue that professionals can inadvertently be part of the ‘conducive context’ for coercive control (Kelly, 2007), impeding meaningful attempts to address the devastating and widespread impacts of men’s violence against women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各机构如何促成并延续对妇女的强制控制
本文探讨了更广泛地了解男性对女性施暴(尤其是胁迫控制)的必要性,以及这种支配、剥削和非人化的广泛模式在施暴者个人之外的影响程度。实施胁迫性控制的男性还操纵机构和专业人员(医疗保健和刑事司法服务以及其他部门),将其作为伤害伴侣的另一种手段。与此同时,这些机构对试图获得支持的女性实施各种形式的控制和限制,反映并放大了男性的虐待行为,进一步缩小了女性的行动空间(Kelly et al,2014)。这篇反思性文章借鉴了作者的研究和实践经验,对胁迫性控制这一普遍存在的误解提出质疑,认为胁迫性控制是一个偶发的、人际交往的过程,而不是一个事件的过程(Lombard & Proctor, 2023),它也可以通过机构、制度和系统来实施。我们认为,专业人员可能会无意中成为胁迫性控制的 "有利环境 "的一部分(Kelly,2007 年),从而阻碍了解决男性暴力侵害妇女的破坏性和广泛影响的有意义的尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural Scaffolding and Dark Triad: A Feminist Poststructuralist Perspective on Male Perpetrators of Domestic Violence and Abuse Coercive Control in Children’s and Mothers’ Lives The Impact of Coercive Control Legislation for Transgender People in Australia Coercive control: A decade later How agencies enable and perpetuate the coercive control of women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1