The investigative learning and its daily applicability

Concilium Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.53660/clm-3743-24n16
Nelson Barrelo Junior, Francisco da Veiga Quevedo
{"title":"The investigative learning and its daily applicability","authors":"Nelson Barrelo Junior, Francisco da Veiga Quevedo","doi":"10.53660/clm-3743-24n16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the effectiveness of collaborative teaching methods with traditional expository approaches in high school physics classes. Through bibliographical review, it discusses the definitions and differences between collaboration and cooperation to establish clear terminology. Initially, the paper examines the limitations of expository teaching methods and the benefits of collaborative teaching, drawing on Vygotsky’s concepts such as the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and the idea of the most capable pair. It also looks at how these concepts are recommended for classroom use according to official Brazilian documents, like the National Common Core Curriculum (BNCC) and the Law of Guidelines and Bases of National Education (LDB 9394/96). Collaborative teaching through investigative methods significantly improves learning quality and helps students become more employable. Lastly, the paper compares investigative methodologies with approaches from other fields, such as group therapy and pair programming, to highlight their advantages and applicability.","PeriodicalId":505714,"journal":{"name":"Concilium","volume":" 1017","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concilium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53660/clm-3743-24n16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper compares the effectiveness of collaborative teaching methods with traditional expository approaches in high school physics classes. Through bibliographical review, it discusses the definitions and differences between collaboration and cooperation to establish clear terminology. Initially, the paper examines the limitations of expository teaching methods and the benefits of collaborative teaching, drawing on Vygotsky’s concepts such as the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and the idea of the most capable pair. It also looks at how these concepts are recommended for classroom use according to official Brazilian documents, like the National Common Core Curriculum (BNCC) and the Law of Guidelines and Bases of National Education (LDB 9394/96). Collaborative teaching through investigative methods significantly improves learning quality and helps students become more employable. Lastly, the paper compares investigative methodologies with approaches from other fields, such as group therapy and pair programming, to highlight their advantages and applicability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探究性学习及其日常应用
本文比较了高中物理课堂中合作教学法与传统讲解法的有效性。通过文献综述,本文讨论了协作与合作的定义和区别,以确定明确的术语。论文首先借鉴维果茨基的概念,如 "最近发展区"(ZPD)和 "能力最强的一对 "的概念,探讨了说明式教学法的局限性和协作式教学法的益处。报告还探讨了巴西官方文件,如《国家共同核心课程》(BNCC)和《国家教育方针和基础法》(LDB 9394/96)是如何建议在课堂上使用这些概念的。通过探究式方法开展合作教学能显著提高学习质量,帮助学生提高就业能力。最后,本文将探究方法与其他领域的方法(如小组疗法和结对编程)进行了比较,以突出其优势和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality of life of home care service professionals Scientific production about associated factors, methods and locations of self-mutilation in adolescents Pedagogical and educational management innovations and the opportunity to study the SDGs with intentionality Immunobiologicals in severe asthma: case report Professional participation in permanente health education at public hospital in Sobral - CE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1