Impact of Vine Management on Yield and Quality Parameters of Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)

Barsha Nath, B. P. Gautam, N. Buragohain, R. K. Goswami, B. Bora
{"title":"Impact of Vine Management on Yield and Quality Parameters of Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)","authors":"Barsha Nath, B. P. Gautam, N. Buragohain, R. K. Goswami, B. Bora","doi":"10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was conducted at the Instructional cum Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Biswanath College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, Biswanath Chariali with an aim to study the effect of vine management on yield, yield attributing factors and quality parameters (which included nutritional factors such as vitamin A, vitamin C) of pumpkin. The treatments were: T1 (Trimming of growing tip of the primary vine at 8th node stage), T2 (Trimming of growing tip of the primary vine at 10th node stage), T3 (Trimming of growing tip of the primary vine at 12th node stage), T4(Trimming of growing tip of the secondary vine at 6th node stage), T5(Trimming of growing tip of the secondary vine at 8th node stage), T6 (Removal of all tertiary vines), T7 (Retention of two tertiary vines) and T8(control without pruning). T3 further recorded the minimum days to appearance of first male (49.17 days), female (58.15 days) flowers, fruit set to harvest duration (51.43 days) and crop duration (110.55 days) while T8 recorded the maximum days. Significant variation was observed in the yield parameters where T3 recorded the maximum number of fruits (6.27),fruit weight (2.47 kg), fruit yield per plant (15.47 kg) and yield per hectare (27.88 t/ha). Fruit characters such as fruit length, fruit diameter and number of seeds revealed no significant differences among the different treatments but with respect to quality parameters pruning revealed significant differences in terms of vitamin A and ascorbic acid content. The experiment thus concluded that the treatment T3 (Trimming of growing tip of the primary vine at 12th node stage) produced the highest yield with higher B: C ratio of 2.52 and it can be recommended to the farmers of Assam in order to maximize the production and productivity of pumpkin.","PeriodicalId":14186,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","volume":"23 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study was conducted at the Instructional cum Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Biswanath College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, Biswanath Chariali with an aim to study the effect of vine management on yield, yield attributing factors and quality parameters (which included nutritional factors such as vitamin A, vitamin C) of pumpkin. The treatments were: T1 (Trimming of growing tip of the primary vine at 8th node stage), T2 (Trimming of growing tip of the primary vine at 10th node stage), T3 (Trimming of growing tip of the primary vine at 12th node stage), T4(Trimming of growing tip of the secondary vine at 6th node stage), T5(Trimming of growing tip of the secondary vine at 8th node stage), T6 (Removal of all tertiary vines), T7 (Retention of two tertiary vines) and T8(control without pruning). T3 further recorded the minimum days to appearance of first male (49.17 days), female (58.15 days) flowers, fruit set to harvest duration (51.43 days) and crop duration (110.55 days) while T8 recorded the maximum days. Significant variation was observed in the yield parameters where T3 recorded the maximum number of fruits (6.27),fruit weight (2.47 kg), fruit yield per plant (15.47 kg) and yield per hectare (27.88 t/ha). Fruit characters such as fruit length, fruit diameter and number of seeds revealed no significant differences among the different treatments but with respect to quality parameters pruning revealed significant differences in terms of vitamin A and ascorbic acid content. The experiment thus concluded that the treatment T3 (Trimming of growing tip of the primary vine at 12th node stage) produced the highest yield with higher B: C ratio of 2.52 and it can be recommended to the farmers of Assam in order to maximize the production and productivity of pumpkin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
藤蔓管理对南瓜产量和质量参数的影响
本研究在阿萨姆农业大学比斯瓦纳特农业学院园艺系的教学暨研究农场进行,旨在研究藤蔓管理对南瓜产量、产量因子和质量参数(包括维生素 A、维生素 C 等营养因子)的影响。处理为T1(在第 8 节期修剪主蔓的生长梢)、T2(在第 10 节期修剪主蔓的生长梢)、T3(在第 12 节期修剪主蔓的生长梢)、T4(在第 6 节期修剪副蔓的生长梢)、T5(在第 8 节期修剪副蔓的生长梢)、T6(去除所有三级蔓)、T7(保留两个三级蔓)和 T8(未修剪对照)。T3 出现第一朵雄花(49.17 天)和雌花(58.15 天)的天数、坐果至收获期(51.43 天)和作物生长期(110.55 天)均为最短,而 T8 为最长。在产量参数方面观察到显著差异,T3 的果实数(6.27 个)、果实重量(2.47 千克)、单株果实产量(15.47 千克)和每公顷产量(27.88 吨/公顷)最高。果实特征(如果实长度、果实直径和种子数量)在不同处理间无显著差异,但在品质参数方面,修剪处理在维生素 A 和抗坏血酸含量方面有显著差异。因此,试验得出结论,处理 T3(在第 12 节期修剪主蔓的生长梢)产量最高,B:C 比值为 2.52,可推荐给阿萨姆邦的农民,以最大限度地提高南瓜的产量和生产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seasonal Incidence of Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias vittella) in Okra Response of Quinoa to Different Levels of Spacing and Fertilizer Characterisation of Soil Properties of CRC-2 and CRC-3 at ITM University, under Gwalior Region, M.P, India Effect of NAA and ZnSO4 on Cracking and Chemical Properties of Litchi Fruits Impact of Hasanta Rice on Yield and Brown Plant Hopper Incidence in Rain-Fed Semi-lowland Ecosystems: A Farmer-centric Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1