Effect of Different In-Office Bleaching techniques on Enamel Color and Surface Roughness: In Vitro Study

Huda Abed El-Haliem, Maha Mohamed Ebaya
{"title":"Effect of Different In-Office Bleaching techniques on Enamel Color and Surface Roughness: In Vitro Study","authors":"Huda Abed El-Haliem, Maha Mohamed Ebaya","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.285714.3023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate and compare the influence of various in-office bleaching agents on enamel color change and surface roughness Materials and Methods: Sixty human permanent maxillary central incisors were collected and maintained in cylinder plastic mold (1cm height and 2cm width). Teeth were assigned based on the test into two groups; color change test group (n=30), and the surface roughness test group (n=30). Based on the bleaching technique, each group was further assigned into 3 subgroups (n=10) (light activated bleaching agent: Philips Zoom, chemical-activated; Philips Dash and two layer technique chemical activated; Zoom QuickPro). A spectrophotometer was used to measure the enamel color change in each bleaching technique. In addition, a non-contact optical profilometer was used to assess the surface roughness both before and after bleaching. The outcomes for each test were analyzed statistically using Student’s t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc tukey. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.005. Results : Considering the color change measurements, all tested groups after bleaching exhibited statistical significant difference (P=0.0112). The Zoom group had the highest mean values subsequently Dash and Quick pro groups. For the surface roughness results, there was no statistical significant difference of all the tested groups after bleaching (P=0.592). Conclusions: All the studied in-office bleaching systems had a positive effect on teeth whitening; with the highest whitening potential for the light-activated system in comparison to the chemical-activated and two layer bleaching techniques. The enamel surface roughness exhibited insignificant changes in the different studied systems.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.285714.3023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the influence of various in-office bleaching agents on enamel color change and surface roughness Materials and Methods: Sixty human permanent maxillary central incisors were collected and maintained in cylinder plastic mold (1cm height and 2cm width). Teeth were assigned based on the test into two groups; color change test group (n=30), and the surface roughness test group (n=30). Based on the bleaching technique, each group was further assigned into 3 subgroups (n=10) (light activated bleaching agent: Philips Zoom, chemical-activated; Philips Dash and two layer technique chemical activated; Zoom QuickPro). A spectrophotometer was used to measure the enamel color change in each bleaching technique. In addition, a non-contact optical profilometer was used to assess the surface roughness both before and after bleaching. The outcomes for each test were analyzed statistically using Student’s t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc tukey. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.005. Results : Considering the color change measurements, all tested groups after bleaching exhibited statistical significant difference (P=0.0112). The Zoom group had the highest mean values subsequently Dash and Quick pro groups. For the surface roughness results, there was no statistical significant difference of all the tested groups after bleaching (P=0.592). Conclusions: All the studied in-office bleaching systems had a positive effect on teeth whitening; with the highest whitening potential for the light-activated system in comparison to the chemical-activated and two layer bleaching techniques. The enamel surface roughness exhibited insignificant changes in the different studied systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同诊室漂白技术对珐琅质颜色和表面粗糙度的影响:体外研究
目的评估和比较各种诊室漂白剂对珐琅质颜色变化和表面粗糙度的影响 材料与方法:收集 60 颗人类上颌恒中切牙,并将其保存在圆柱形塑料模具(高 1 厘米,宽 2 厘米)中。根据测试结果将牙齿分为两组:颜色变化测试组(30 个)和表面粗糙度测试组(30 个)。根据漂白技术,每组又分为 3 个亚组(n=10)(光激活漂白剂组:飞利浦 Zoom;化学激活漂白剂组:飞利浦 Zoom;化学激活漂白剂组:飞利浦 Zoom):飞利浦 Zoom;化学激活;飞利浦 Dash;双层技术化学激活;Zoom QuickPro)。分光光度计用于测量每种漂白技术的珐琅质颜色变化。此外,还使用了非接触式光学轮廓仪来评估漂白前后的表面粗糙度。每项测试的结果均采用学生 t 检验、单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析,然后进行事后检验。显著性水平设定为 p ≤ 0.005。结果:考虑到颜色变化的测量结果,漂白后的所有测试组都表现出显著的统计学差异(P=0.0112)。Zoom 组的平均值最高,其次是 Dash 组和 Quick pro 组。至于表面粗糙度结果,所有测试组在漂白后均无显着统计学差异(P=0.592)。结论所有研究的诊室漂白系统对牙齿美白都有积极作用;与化学激活和双层漂白技术相比,光激活系统的美白潜力最大。珐琅质表面粗糙度在所研究的不同漂白系统中变化不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness Of Smartphone Application In Improving Oral Hygiene Compared To Oral Instructions In Patients With Plaque-induced Gingivitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Histopathological Evaluation of Cholecalciferol Overdose on Tongue Structure of Albino Rats (Immunohistochemical Study) EFFECT OF EXTERNAL COLD AND VIBRATION (BUZZY DEVICE) VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL INJECTION TECHNIQUE ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING LOCAL ANESTHESIA ADMINSTRATION IN CHILDREN: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICALTRIAL STUDY Effect of Different In-Office Bleaching techniques on Enamel Color and Surface Roughness: In Vitro Study SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND COLOR STABILITY OF MILLED VERSUS 3D PRINTED INTERIM RESTORATION AFTER IMMERSION IN TWO PH MEDIA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1