Factors Affecting Implementation of Joint Commission International Standards in Egyptian Hospitals: A comparative study between two private hospitals in Egypt.

محمد عبدربه
{"title":"Factors Affecting Implementation of Joint Commission International Standards in Egyptian Hospitals: A comparative study between two private hospitals in Egypt.","authors":"محمد عبدربه","doi":"10.21608/cfdj.2023.245466.1846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed at investigating the main factors affecting the joint commission standards implementation in Egypt, through conducting a comparative study between two private hospitals in Egypt. A comparative study between two private hospitals, one of them was accredited and another one even failed to apply for survey. Direct observation of significant areas at the two studied hospitals using a semi-structured observation checklist includes a list of pre-specified categories. A comparison between the two hospitals regarding positive and negative points under each category was conducted. Additionally, a face-to-face interview of a sample of internal customers at the two studied hospitals was conducted using a questionnaire with open-ended questions. Observation revealed major differences between the two hospitals in the areas of communication and safety measures. Both hospitals were comparable regarding patients’ privacy and confidentiality. Interviewing internal customers showed most of internal customers in the non-accredited hospital were unaware about accreditation. Success of a hospital to get accredited is associated with staff education & training, top management support, cooperation between different departments and recruitment of competent staff. Instead, failure of accreditation is attributed to the hospital design & infrastructure don't comply with standards in addition to un-supportive top management. Creating motivate decision makers in hospitals to be supportive and commitment to quality plans is essential and should be a priority from the side of Ministry of Health in Egypt. Raising awareness at both managerial and customer levels about requirements and benefits of accreditation to the hospital, customers and staff is very crucial.","PeriodicalId":176283,"journal":{"name":"المجلة العلمية للدراسات والبحوث المالية والتجارية","volume":"348 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"المجلة العلمية للدراسات والبحوث المالية والتجارية","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/cfdj.2023.245466.1846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed at investigating the main factors affecting the joint commission standards implementation in Egypt, through conducting a comparative study between two private hospitals in Egypt. A comparative study between two private hospitals, one of them was accredited and another one even failed to apply for survey. Direct observation of significant areas at the two studied hospitals using a semi-structured observation checklist includes a list of pre-specified categories. A comparison between the two hospitals regarding positive and negative points under each category was conducted. Additionally, a face-to-face interview of a sample of internal customers at the two studied hospitals was conducted using a questionnaire with open-ended questions. Observation revealed major differences between the two hospitals in the areas of communication and safety measures. Both hospitals were comparable regarding patients’ privacy and confidentiality. Interviewing internal customers showed most of internal customers in the non-accredited hospital were unaware about accreditation. Success of a hospital to get accredited is associated with staff education & training, top management support, cooperation between different departments and recruitment of competent staff. Instead, failure of accreditation is attributed to the hospital design & infrastructure don't comply with standards in addition to un-supportive top management. Creating motivate decision makers in hospitals to be supportive and commitment to quality plans is essential and should be a priority from the side of Ministry of Health in Egypt. Raising awareness at both managerial and customer levels about requirements and benefits of accreditation to the hospital, customers and staff is very crucial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响埃及医院实施国际联合委员会标准的因素:埃及两家私立医院的比较研究。
本研究旨在通过对埃及两家私立医院进行比较研究,调查影响联合委员会标准在埃及实施的主要因素。对两家私立医院进行比较研究,其中一家医院通过了认证,另一家医院甚至没有申请调查。使用半结构化观察清单对两家医院的重要领域进行直接观察,其中包括预先指定的类别清单。对两家医院在每个类别下的积极和消极方面进行了比较。此外,还使用开放式问题问卷对两家医院的内部客户进行了面对面访谈。观察结果显示,两家医院在沟通和安全措施方面存在较大差异。在病人隐私和保密方面,两家医院不相上下。对内部客户的访谈显示,未通过评审的医院的大部分内部客户对评审一无所知。医院成功通过评审与员工教育和培训、高层管理人员的支持、不同部门之间的合作以及招聘有能力的员工有关。相反,评审失败的原因是医院的设计和基础设施不符合标准,以及最高管理层不支持。埃及卫生部应优先考虑激励医院决策者支持并致力于质量计划。提高管理层和客户对医院、客户和员工认证要求和好处的认识至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
استخدام تحليل الحد العشوائي لقياس الكفاءه الاستثمارية وكفاءه الربحية في شركات التامين على الحياه في السوق المصري Mediation and Moderation Model of the Relationship between Live Streaming Promotion and Online Impulsive Buying Behavior An Empirical Study on Egyptian Fashion Wear Customers How and when do big data analytics pay off? The role of value creation and market turbulence التأثير المُعَدِل لليقظة الذهنية في العلاقة بين تفضيل المستهلك للثقافة الأجنبية وتأييد العلامة التجارية: دراسة تطبيقية على عملاء المطاعم دور حوكمة الشركات في الحد من ممارسات المحاسبة الإبداعية لتحقيق جودة التقارير المالية ( دراسة تطبيقية )
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1