Surface Roughness and Stain Remover Ability of Prophylaxis Paste and Biochar Gel for Stained Teeth Based on Cucurbita Moschata – In Vitro Study

Shadwa Kabil, Mohamed Mostafa Zayed, Mayssa Abdel Hady Mohamed, Elsayed Gamal Zaki Swelame, Shaimaa Mosutafa Rohym
{"title":"Surface Roughness and Stain Remover Ability of Prophylaxis Paste and Biochar Gel for Stained Teeth Based on Cucurbita Moschata – In Vitro Study","authors":"Shadwa Kabil, Mohamed Mostafa Zayed, Mayssa Abdel Hady Mohamed, Elsayed Gamal Zaki Swelame, Shaimaa Mosutafa Rohym","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.291375.3047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: While the term “polishing” has been employed to refer to the expert elimination of soft deposits and stains from the surfaces of teeth, this encompasses both cleaning and polishing. Objective: To compare invitro the surface roughness and stain Remover Ability of Prophylaxis Paste and Biochar gel for Stained Teeth Based on Cucurbita Moschata. Materials and methods : study was carried out on 10 sound non-carious periodontally involved human premolars teeth after getting the patients’ approval (age of 20-40 years). Teeth were then immersed in black tea for 24 hrs. After staining, all specimens were stored in artificial saliva for 7 days. Then randomization by software divided in to 2 groups: Group 1: Prophylaxis paste, Group 2: Biochar Gel. Specimens were embedded in self-cure acrylic resin and allowed to set to create blocks. Specimen was divided horizontally into three thirds by permanent colour marks. Each sample were subjected to Mitutoyo Surface Roughness Tester pre and post polishing in both groups. Shade Assessment of the three thirds of each sample were assessed before and after polishing per group by VITA Easyshade ® V. Results: In surface roughness, Comparison between prophylaxis paste and Biochar Gel revealed insignificant difference as P was 0.46 and 0.27 regarding pre-and post-polishing respectively. Regarding stain remover ability, comparison between Biochar gel and prophylaxis paste groups regarding post-polishing VITA SYSTEM 3D-MASTER shade guide and VITA classical shade guide showed no significant difference as P>0.05. Conclusion: Biochar Gel Based on Cucurbita Moschata is considered a promising alternative to prophylactic pastes.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.291375.3047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While the term “polishing” has been employed to refer to the expert elimination of soft deposits and stains from the surfaces of teeth, this encompasses both cleaning and polishing. Objective: To compare invitro the surface roughness and stain Remover Ability of Prophylaxis Paste and Biochar gel for Stained Teeth Based on Cucurbita Moschata. Materials and methods : study was carried out on 10 sound non-carious periodontally involved human premolars teeth after getting the patients’ approval (age of 20-40 years). Teeth were then immersed in black tea for 24 hrs. After staining, all specimens were stored in artificial saliva for 7 days. Then randomization by software divided in to 2 groups: Group 1: Prophylaxis paste, Group 2: Biochar Gel. Specimens were embedded in self-cure acrylic resin and allowed to set to create blocks. Specimen was divided horizontally into three thirds by permanent colour marks. Each sample were subjected to Mitutoyo Surface Roughness Tester pre and post polishing in both groups. Shade Assessment of the three thirds of each sample were assessed before and after polishing per group by VITA Easyshade ® V. Results: In surface roughness, Comparison between prophylaxis paste and Biochar Gel revealed insignificant difference as P was 0.46 and 0.27 regarding pre-and post-polishing respectively. Regarding stain remover ability, comparison between Biochar gel and prophylaxis paste groups regarding post-polishing VITA SYSTEM 3D-MASTER shade guide and VITA classical shade guide showed no significant difference as P>0.05. Conclusion: Biochar Gel Based on Cucurbita Moschata is considered a promising alternative to prophylactic pastes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以葫芦为原料的预防牙膏和生物炭凝胶的表面粗糙度和去污能力--体外研究
介绍:虽然 "抛光 "一词是指通过专业手段去除牙齿表面的软沉积物和污渍,但它同时包括清洁和抛光。目的比较预防牙膏和生物炭凝胶的表面粗糙度和去污能力。材料和方法:在征得患者(20-40 岁)同意后,对 10 颗无龋牙周病的人类前臼齿进行了研究。然后将牙齿浸泡在红茶中 24 小时。染色后,所有标本在人工唾液中保存 7 天。然后用软件随机分为两组:第 1 组:预防膏,第 2 组:生物炭凝胶。将标本嵌入自固化丙烯酸树脂中,待其凝固后形成块状。用永久性颜色标记将试样水平分成三等分。两组的每个试样在抛光前和抛光后都要接受三丰表面粗糙度测试仪的检测。用 VITA Easyshade ® V 对每组样品的三分之二在抛光前后进行阴影评估:在表面粗糙度方面,预防膏和生物炭凝胶在抛光前和抛光后的 P 值分别为 0.46 和 0.27,差异不明显。在去污能力方面,生物炭凝胶组和预防膏组在抛光后的 VITA SYSTEM 3D-MASTER 遮光导板和 VITA 经典遮光导板之间的比较没有发现显著差异,P>0.05。结论基于葫芦的生物炭凝胶被认为是一种很有前途的预防性糊剂替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness Of Smartphone Application In Improving Oral Hygiene Compared To Oral Instructions In Patients With Plaque-induced Gingivitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Histopathological Evaluation of Cholecalciferol Overdose on Tongue Structure of Albino Rats (Immunohistochemical Study) EFFECT OF EXTERNAL COLD AND VIBRATION (BUZZY DEVICE) VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL INJECTION TECHNIQUE ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING LOCAL ANESTHESIA ADMINSTRATION IN CHILDREN: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICALTRIAL STUDY Effect of Different In-Office Bleaching techniques on Enamel Color and Surface Roughness: In Vitro Study SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND COLOR STABILITY OF MILLED VERSUS 3D PRINTED INTERIM RESTORATION AFTER IMMERSION IN TWO PH MEDIA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1