Integrating flood and earthquake resilience: a framework for assessing urban community resilience against multiple hazards

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 安全科学与韧性(英文) Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.05.002
Zahra Ahmadi , Mahdi Ghasemi , Amir Reza KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR , Mohammad Ahmadi
{"title":"Integrating flood and earthquake resilience: a framework for assessing urban community resilience against multiple hazards","authors":"Zahra Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Mahdi Ghasemi ,&nbsp;Amir Reza KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ahmadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Floods and earthquakes are the most common natural disasters, causing significant damage and casualties in urban communities. Although academic research has focused on assessing cities' ability to withstand these natural disasters, there is a lack of established frameworks for evaluating resilience against multiple hazards. This research integrates the earthquake and flood resilience indicators to create a comprehensive resilience assessment framework. This study integrated seismic and flood resilience indicators and categorized them into 27 clusters. It also used the DEMATEL (Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method to determine the significance of clusters and prioritize them. This research identified 13 cause clusters and 14 effect clusters of indicators for seismic and flood resilience. The ‘response capacity’ cluster has the most impact on seismic and flood resilience, while the ‘transportation and accessibility’ cluster is the most affected cluster. This article presents a framework for evaluating flood and seismic resilience and makes suggestions for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 330-343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449624000392/pdfft?md5=d861317af6e371a169e4e36a7fa1cd65&pid=1-s2.0-S2666449624000392-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449624000392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Floods and earthquakes are the most common natural disasters, causing significant damage and casualties in urban communities. Although academic research has focused on assessing cities' ability to withstand these natural disasters, there is a lack of established frameworks for evaluating resilience against multiple hazards. This research integrates the earthquake and flood resilience indicators to create a comprehensive resilience assessment framework. This study integrated seismic and flood resilience indicators and categorized them into 27 clusters. It also used the DEMATEL (Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method to determine the significance of clusters and prioritize them. This research identified 13 cause clusters and 14 effect clusters of indicators for seismic and flood resilience. The ‘response capacity’ cluster has the most impact on seismic and flood resilience, while the ‘transportation and accessibility’ cluster is the most affected cluster. This article presents a framework for evaluating flood and seismic resilience and makes suggestions for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合抗洪和抗震能力:评估城市社区抵御多种灾害能力的框架
洪水和地震是最常见的自然灾害,对城市社区造成了重大破坏和人员伤亡。尽管学术研究主要集中在评估城市抵御这些自然灾害的能力上,但目前还缺乏评估城市抵御多种灾害能力的既定框架。本研究整合了地震和洪水抗灾能力指标,创建了一个全面的抗灾能力评估框架。本研究整合了地震和洪水抗灾能力指标,并将其分为 27 个群组。研究还使用了 DEMATEL(决策试验与评估实验室)方法来确定各组群的重要性和优先顺序。这项研究确定了抗震和抗洪指标的 13 个原因群组和 14 个影响群组。其中,"响应能力 "指标群对抗震和抗洪能力的影响最大,而 "交通和可达性 "指标群则是受影响最大的指标群。本文提出了评估抗洪和抗震能力的框架,并为今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Grasping emergency dynamics: A review of group evacuation techniques and strategies in major emergencies Multi-factor coupled forest fire model based on cellular automata Scenario construction and vulnerability assessment of natural hazards-triggered power grid accidents Risk assessment of fire casualty in underground commercial building based on FFTA-BN model Determination of individual disaster resilience levels of hospital staff: A case study of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1