Audience-authored paratexts: legitimation of online discourse about Game of Thrones

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Frontiers of Narrative Studies Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1515/fns-2024-2003
Markus Laukkanen
{"title":"Audience-authored paratexts: legitimation of online discourse about Game of Thrones","authors":"Markus Laukkanen","doi":"10.1515/fns-2024-2003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n With the increasing proliferation of the internet, audience-authored online paratexts continue to gain significance in culture and in the communicative structures of narrative texts. This article takes a critical look at the ways in which Gérard Genette’s concept of paratext (1987) has been used in contemporary scholarship. The article offers a model of online paratexts based on an interdisciplinary understanding of paratextuality and internet-age culture. Ways in which paratexts become legitimate in online environments are considered through the analysis of HBO’s popular TV series Game of Thrones (2011–2019). Legitimation extends from production-authored paratexts to audience-authored paratexts, reflecting changes in the relationship between authors and readers typical to contemporary culture. Finally, the article introduces the concept of paratextual reauthoring, which refers to the practice of canonizing alternative interpretations of texts via the use of online paratexts.","PeriodicalId":29849,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fns-2024-2003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing proliferation of the internet, audience-authored online paratexts continue to gain significance in culture and in the communicative structures of narrative texts. This article takes a critical look at the ways in which Gérard Genette’s concept of paratext (1987) has been used in contemporary scholarship. The article offers a model of online paratexts based on an interdisciplinary understanding of paratextuality and internet-age culture. Ways in which paratexts become legitimate in online environments are considered through the analysis of HBO’s popular TV series Game of Thrones (2011–2019). Legitimation extends from production-authored paratexts to audience-authored paratexts, reflecting changes in the relationship between authors and readers typical to contemporary culture. Finally, the article introduces the concept of paratextual reauthoring, which refers to the practice of canonizing alternative interpretations of texts via the use of online paratexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受众撰写的副文本:《权力的游戏》在线话语的合法化
随着互联网的日益普及,由受众撰写的网络副文本在文化和叙事文本的交流结构中的重要性与日俱增。本文对热拉尔-热奈特(Gérard Genette,1987 年)提出的副文本概念在当代学术研究中的应用方式进行了批判性审视。文章基于对准文本性和互联网时代文化的跨学科理解,提出了一个在线准文本模型。文章通过分析 HBO 的热门电视剧《权力的游戏》(2011-2019 年),探讨了准文本在网络环境中合法化的方式。合法化从制作人撰写的副文本扩展到受众撰写的副文本,反映了作者与读者之间的关系在当代文化中的典型变化。最后,文章介绍了 "副文本再创作"(paratextual reauthoring)这一概念,指的是通过使用在线副文本将文本的其他解释规范化的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Joseph Conrad’s reluctant raconteurs Horizontal metalepsis in narrative fiction Explaining the innovation dichotomy: the contexts, contents, conflicts, and compromises of innovation stories Audience-authored paratexts: legitimation of online discourse about Game of Thrones Figures of discourse in prose fiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1