Reducing Blood Culture Contamination Rates: Introduction of a Combined Education and Skin Antisepsis Intervention

Niamh Mullane, Niall O'Mara, Darragh Coffey, Aine Connolly, Isabelle O'Callaghan, Deborah Kelly, Deirdre Broderick, Caitriona Hickey
{"title":"Reducing Blood Culture Contamination Rates: Introduction of a Combined Education and Skin Antisepsis Intervention","authors":"Niamh Mullane, Niall O'Mara, Darragh Coffey, Aine Connolly, Isabelle O'Callaghan, Deborah Kelly, Deirdre Broderick, Caitriona Hickey","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000806.v3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background. Blood culture contamination (BCC) is an important quality concern in clinical microbiology as it can lead to unnecessary antimicrobial therapy in patients and increased workload for laboratory scientists. The Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute recommend BCC rates to be <3 % and recently updated guidelines have set a new goal of 1 %. The aim of this project was to design and implement interventions to reduce BCC rates at our institution.\n \n Methods. We introduced a combined education and skin antisepsis intervention in a large Model 4 academic teaching hospital in the South of Ireland. BD ChloraPrep skin antisepsis applicators (2 % chlorhexidine gluconate/70 % isopropyl alcohol), licensed for use for blood culture specimen collection, were introduced, replacing Clinell (2 % chlorhexidine gluconate/70 % isopropyl alcohol) wipes. In addition, a multimodal education programme was designed and delivered. This consisted of a video demonstrating the recommended blood culture specimen collection technique using the new applicators as well as simulation training for all interns. The video was uploaded to the intranet as an educational resource available to all staff.\n \n Results. The interventions were implemented in July 2022 and BCC rates pre- and post-intervention were calculated. The average BCC rate for the 12 months preceding the intervention (July 2021 to July 2022) was 2.56 % with highest rates in the Emergency Department. This compared to an average rate of 2.2 % in the 12 months post-intervention (July 2022 to July 2023). In comparing the two rates the reduction in BCC rates between the two periods was not statistically significant (P=0.30).\n \n Conclusion. Overall BCC rates reduced but the difference between the two periods did not reach statistical significance. The resource-intensive nature of providing regular and timely feedback of contamination rates and the larger impact of in-person education and training over virtual modalities may explain the modest reduction. Further investments in these areas, particularly in the Emergency Department, will be necessary to further reduce rates in line with new recommendations.","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000806.v3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Blood culture contamination (BCC) is an important quality concern in clinical microbiology as it can lead to unnecessary antimicrobial therapy in patients and increased workload for laboratory scientists. The Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute recommend BCC rates to be <3 % and recently updated guidelines have set a new goal of 1 %. The aim of this project was to design and implement interventions to reduce BCC rates at our institution. Methods. We introduced a combined education and skin antisepsis intervention in a large Model 4 academic teaching hospital in the South of Ireland. BD ChloraPrep skin antisepsis applicators (2 % chlorhexidine gluconate/70 % isopropyl alcohol), licensed for use for blood culture specimen collection, were introduced, replacing Clinell (2 % chlorhexidine gluconate/70 % isopropyl alcohol) wipes. In addition, a multimodal education programme was designed and delivered. This consisted of a video demonstrating the recommended blood culture specimen collection technique using the new applicators as well as simulation training for all interns. The video was uploaded to the intranet as an educational resource available to all staff. Results. The interventions were implemented in July 2022 and BCC rates pre- and post-intervention were calculated. The average BCC rate for the 12 months preceding the intervention (July 2021 to July 2022) was 2.56 % with highest rates in the Emergency Department. This compared to an average rate of 2.2 % in the 12 months post-intervention (July 2022 to July 2023). In comparing the two rates the reduction in BCC rates between the two periods was not statistically significant (P=0.30). Conclusion. Overall BCC rates reduced but the difference between the two periods did not reach statistical significance. The resource-intensive nature of providing regular and timely feedback of contamination rates and the larger impact of in-person education and training over virtual modalities may explain the modest reduction. Further investments in these areas, particularly in the Emergency Department, will be necessary to further reduce rates in line with new recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降低血培养污染率:采用教育与皮肤防腐相结合的干预措施
背景。血液培养污染(BCC)是临床微生物学的一个重要质量问题,因为它可能导致患者接受不必要的抗菌治疗,并增加实验室科学家的工作量。临床实验室与标准协会建议 BCC 的发生率为 <3%,最近更新的指南将新目标设定为 1%。本项目旨在设计和实施干预措施,以降低本机构的 BCC 感染率。 方法。我们在爱尔兰南部的一家大型四级教学医院引入了教育与皮肤防腐相结合的干预措施。我们引进了获得许可用于血液培养标本采集的 BD ChloraPrep 皮肤防腐涂抹器(2% 葡萄糖酸氯己定/70% 异丙醇),取代了 Clinell(2% 葡萄糖酸氯己定/70% 异丙醇)湿巾。此外,还设计并实施了一项多模式教育计划。其中包括一段视频,演示了使用新涂抹器采集血培养标本的推荐技术,并对所有实习生进行了模拟培训。该视频已上传到内联网,作为教育资源提供给所有员工。 结果。干预措施于 2022 年 7 月实施,并计算了干预前后的 BCC 感染率。干预前 12 个月(2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 7 月)的平均 BCC 率为 2.56%,其中急诊科的 BCC 率最高。相比之下,干预后 12 个月(2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 7 月)的平均 BCC 感染率为 2.2%。在比较这两个比率时,两个时期 BCC 比率的降低并无统计学意义(P=0.30)。 结论。BCC 发病率总体上有所下降,但两个时期之间的差异未达到统计学意义上的显著性。定期及时反馈污染率需要大量资源,而且面对面的教育和培训比虚拟方式的影响更大,这可能是污染率略有下降的原因。要想按照新建议进一步降低污染率,有必要在这些领域(尤其是急诊科)进一步投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peribacillus simplex and Klebsiella pneumoniae responsible for pyonephrosis with secondary psoas abscess: a case report. Immunogenicity of bivalent versus monovalent mRNA booster vaccination among adult paramedics in Canada who had received three prior mRNA wild-type doses. Virucidal activity of olanexidine gluconate against SARS-CoV-2. Antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance: Knowledge, Attitude and Practices survey of medical students to evaluate undergraduate training curriculum. Validation of an improved reference freeze-dried direct agglutination test for detecting leishmaniasis in the canine reservoir.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1