PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competition

George Tsoukalas, Jasper Lee, John Jennings, Jimmy Xin, Michelle Ding, Michael Jennings, Amitayush Thakur, Swarat Chaudhuri
{"title":"PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competition","authors":"George Tsoukalas, Jasper Lee, John Jennings, Jimmy Xin, Michelle Ding, Michael Jennings, Amitayush Thakur, Swarat Chaudhuri","doi":"arxiv-2407.11214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present PutnamBench, a new multilingual benchmark for evaluating the\nability of neural theorem-provers to solve competition mathematics problems.\nPutnamBench consists of 1697 hand-constructed formalizations of 640 theorems\nsourced from the William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition, the premier\nundergraduate-level mathematics competition in North America. All the theorems\nhave formalizations in Lean 4 and Isabelle; a substantial subset also has Coq\nformalizations. Proving the theorems requires significant problem-solving\nability and proficiency in a broad range of topics taught in undergraduate\nmathematics courses. We use PutnamBench to evaluate several established neural\nand symbolic theorem-provers. These approaches can only solve a handful of the\nPutnamBench problems, establishing the benchmark as a difficult open challenge\nfor research on neural theorem-proving. PutnamBench is available at\nhttps://github.com/trishullab/PutnamBench.","PeriodicalId":501197,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Programming Languages","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.11214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present PutnamBench, a new multilingual benchmark for evaluating the ability of neural theorem-provers to solve competition mathematics problems. PutnamBench consists of 1697 hand-constructed formalizations of 640 theorems sourced from the William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition, the premier undergraduate-level mathematics competition in North America. All the theorems have formalizations in Lean 4 and Isabelle; a substantial subset also has Coq formalizations. Proving the theorems requires significant problem-solving ability and proficiency in a broad range of topics taught in undergraduate mathematics courses. We use PutnamBench to evaluate several established neural and symbolic theorem-provers. These approaches can only solve a handful of the PutnamBench problems, establishing the benchmark as a difficult open challenge for research on neural theorem-proving. PutnamBench is available at https://github.com/trishullab/PutnamBench.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普特南平台:在普特南数学竞赛中评估神经定理求解器
PutnamBench 是一个新的多语言基准,用于评估神经定理证明器解决竞赛数学问题的能力。PutnamBench 由 1697 个手工构建的 640 个定理的形式化组成,这些定理来自威廉-洛厄尔-普特南数学竞赛(William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition),该竞赛是北美首屈一指的本科生级数学竞赛。所有定理都在 Lean 4 和 Isabelle 中进行了形式化;相当一部分还在 Coq 中进行了形式化。要证明这些定理,必须具备很强的问题解决能力,并熟练掌握本科数学课程中教授的各种主题。我们使用 PutnamBench 评估了几种成熟的神经和符号定理证明器。这些方法只能解决少数几个PutnamBench问题,从而使该基准成为神经定理求解研究的一项艰巨的公开挑战。PutnamBench可在https://github.com/trishullab/PutnamBench。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Memory Consistency and Program Transformations No Saved Kaleidosope: an 100% Jitted Neural Network Coding Language with Pythonic Syntax Towards Quantum Multiparty Session Types The Incredible Shrinking Context... in a decompiler near you Scheme Pearl: Quantum Continuations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1