Iconic origins of language? An essay review of Steven Mithen’s The Language Puzzle (2024)

IF 1.7 1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Biology & Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s10539-024-09952-2
Corijn van Mazijk
{"title":"Iconic origins of language? An essay review of Steven Mithen’s The Language Puzzle (2024)","authors":"Corijn van Mazijk","doi":"10.1007/s10539-024-09952-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay review explores Steven Mithen’s interdisciplinary approach to the origins and evolution of language in <i>The Language Puzzle</i> (2024). It focuses mainly on what I call his <i>iconic vocal origins hypothesis</i>. Mithen challenges the prevalent gestural origins hypothesis, suggesting instead that early prehistoric languages were predominantly vocal and iconic, with conventionalization – as characteristic of symbol use – emerging later. <i>The Language Puzzle</i> draws on research from archaeology, philosophy, computer science, developmental psychology, and many other fields, thus assembling a wealth of insights from various disciplines. While intriguing, Mithen’s suggestion that prehistoric languages may have relied on iconicity instead of conventionalization faces substantial problems, which are discussed in this review essay. In the final section, I also briefly review the important conclusion chapter of Mithen’s book, which contains an imaginative outline of how language evolved from the last common ancestor up until modern <i>H. sapiens.</i> My criticisms of the iconic vocal origins hypothesis notwithstanding, <i>The Language Puzzle</i> is a valuable resource for anyone interested in language evolution, and once again showcases Mithen’s wide-ranging expertise and masterful writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":55368,"journal":{"name":"Biology & Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology & Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-024-09952-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay review explores Steven Mithen’s interdisciplinary approach to the origins and evolution of language in The Language Puzzle (2024). It focuses mainly on what I call his iconic vocal origins hypothesis. Mithen challenges the prevalent gestural origins hypothesis, suggesting instead that early prehistoric languages were predominantly vocal and iconic, with conventionalization – as characteristic of symbol use – emerging later. The Language Puzzle draws on research from archaeology, philosophy, computer science, developmental psychology, and many other fields, thus assembling a wealth of insights from various disciplines. While intriguing, Mithen’s suggestion that prehistoric languages may have relied on iconicity instead of conventionalization faces substantial problems, which are discussed in this review essay. In the final section, I also briefly review the important conclusion chapter of Mithen’s book, which contains an imaginative outline of how language evolved from the last common ancestor up until modern H. sapiens. My criticisms of the iconic vocal origins hypothesis notwithstanding, The Language Puzzle is a valuable resource for anyone interested in language evolution, and once again showcases Mithen’s wide-ranging expertise and masterful writing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言的标志性起源?史蒂文-米辰(Steven Mithen)的《语言之谜》(2024)一文的评论
这篇评论文章探讨了史蒂文-米申在《语言之谜》(2024 年)中对语言起源和进化的跨学科研究方法。文章主要关注我称之为 "标志性发声起源假说 "的内容。米申对流行的手势起源假说提出了质疑,他认为史前早期的语言主要是发声和标志性的,后来才出现了常规化--作为符号使用的特征。语言之谜》借鉴了考古学、哲学、计算机科学、发展心理学等多个领域的研究成果,汇集了各学科的丰富见解。米申所提出的史前语言可能依赖图标性而非常规化的观点虽然引人入胜,但也面临着很多问题,本评论文章将对这些问题进行讨论。在最后一部分,我还简要回顾了米申书中重要的结论章节,其中包含对语言如何从最后的共同祖先一直演化到现代智人的想象性概述。尽管我对标志性发声起源假说提出了批评,但《语言之谜》对于任何对语言进化感兴趣的人来说都是一本宝贵的资料,它再次展示了米滕广泛的专业知识和高超的写作技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biology & Philosophy
Biology & Philosophy 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Recent decades have witnessed fascinating and controversial advances in the biological sciences. This journal answers the need for meta-theoretical analysis, both about the very nature of biology, as well as about its social implications. Biology and Philosophy is aimed at a broad readership, drawn from both the sciences and the humanities. The journal subscribes to no specific school of biology, nor of philosophy, and publishes work from authors of all persuasions and all disciplines. The editorial board reflects this attitude in its composition and its world-wide membership. Each issue of Biology and Philosophy carries one or more discussions or comparative reviews, permitting the in-depth study of important works and topics.
期刊最新文献
Environmental interference Trait-centered vs. fitness-centered definitions of natural selection Exploration and perspectival modelling with model organisms: developmental biology as a case study The evolution of reproductive characters: an organismal-relational approach Different kinds of data: samples and the relational framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1