Biomechanical risk factors and subacromial pain provocation in healthy manufacturing workers.

Claudio Muñoz-Poblete, Jaqueline Inostroza, Juan Carranza-Leiva
{"title":"Biomechanical risk factors and subacromial pain provocation in healthy manufacturing workers.","authors":"Claudio Muñoz-Poblete, Jaqueline Inostroza, Juan Carranza-Leiva","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2371210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) of the shoulder may manifest subclinically. By combining risk assessment and clinical instruments, it may be advisable to recognize workers who may develop more complex MSDs early. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between biomechanical risk factors and subacromial pain provocation in healthy manufacturing workers. <i>Methods.</i> A cross-sectional descriptive observational study was carried out with workers in the furniture manufacturing industry. The occupational repetitive action (OCRA) checklist was applied to detect risk factors and three clinical tests used to detect subacromial tissue reactivity: the supraspinatus test, the painful arc test and the Hawkins-Kennedy test. <i>Results.</i> The positivity of the clinical tests is higher in the supraspinatus test, followed by the Hawkins-Kennedy test, and lowest in the painful arc test, for both the right and left shoulders. No significant associations were found with the overall OCRA checklist index or specific biomechanical factors. <i>Conclusion.</i> The biomechanical risk factors and the provocation of subacromial pain reviewed in this study were not found to be related. Other physical tests that are more sensitive and adapted to workers at risk of developing musculoskeletal shoulder disorders should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2371210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) of the shoulder may manifest subclinically. By combining risk assessment and clinical instruments, it may be advisable to recognize workers who may develop more complex MSDs early. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between biomechanical risk factors and subacromial pain provocation in healthy manufacturing workers. Methods. A cross-sectional descriptive observational study was carried out with workers in the furniture manufacturing industry. The occupational repetitive action (OCRA) checklist was applied to detect risk factors and three clinical tests used to detect subacromial tissue reactivity: the supraspinatus test, the painful arc test and the Hawkins-Kennedy test. Results. The positivity of the clinical tests is higher in the supraspinatus test, followed by the Hawkins-Kennedy test, and lowest in the painful arc test, for both the right and left shoulders. No significant associations were found with the overall OCRA checklist index or specific biomechanical factors. Conclusion. The biomechanical risk factors and the provocation of subacromial pain reviewed in this study were not found to be related. Other physical tests that are more sensitive and adapted to workers at risk of developing musculoskeletal shoulder disorders should be explored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康制造业工人的生物力学风险因素和肩峰下疼痛诱发因素。
目的。与工作相关的肩部肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)可能在亚临床状态下表现出来。通过将风险评估与临床工具相结合,可以及早发现可能患上更复杂 MSD 的工人。本研究旨在评估健康制造业工人的生物力学风险因素与肩峰下疼痛诱发之间的关系。研究方法对家具制造业的工人进行了横断面描述性观察研究。采用职业性重复动作(OCRA)检查表检测风险因素,并采用三种临床测试检测肩峰下组织反应性:冈上肌测试、痛弧测试和霍金斯-肯尼迪测试。结果。左右肩的临床测试中,冈上肌测试的阳性率较高,其次是霍金斯-肯尼迪测试,而疼痛弧测试的阳性率最低。未发现与 OCRA 检查单总指数或特定生物力学因素有明显关联。结论本研究审查的生物力学风险因素与肩峰下疼痛的诱发因素并无关联。应探索其他更灵敏、更适合有肩部肌肉骨骼疾病风险的工人的体能测试方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Prediction of human error probability in helicopter to ship transfer operation under an evidential reasoning extended CREAM approach. Comparison of postural assessment and awareness in individuals receiving posture training using the digital AI posture assessment and correction system. Neuro-fuzzy prediction model of occupational injuries in mining. The impact of digital leadership on safety performance - a moderated mediation model. Air rage from the sharp end: cabin crew perspectives on disruptive passenger behaviour in Europe and its impact on occupational safety and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1