Sultan Ayyadah Alanazi , Bill Vicenzino , Christiaan J.A. van Bergen , David J. Hunter , Erik A. Wikstrom , Hylton B. Menz , Yvonne M. Golightly , Michelle D. Smith , Core Domain Set for Ankle Osteoarthritis Consensus group
{"title":"Development of a core domain set for ankle osteoarthritis: An international consensus study of patients and health professionals","authors":"Sultan Ayyadah Alanazi , Bill Vicenzino , Christiaan J.A. van Bergen , David J. Hunter , Erik A. Wikstrom , Hylton B. Menz , Yvonne M. Golightly , Michelle D. Smith , Core Domain Set for Ankle Osteoarthritis Consensus group","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To develop an internationally agreed-upon core domain set for ankle osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a three-part Delphi process, a group of multidisciplinary health professionals with expertise in ankle OA and people with ankle OA responded to online questionnaires. The questionnaires proposed a list of 29 candidate domains derived from a systematic review of ankle OA research, and interviews with people with ankle OA and health professionals. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement in people with ankle OA and health professionals whether a domain should or should not be included in a core domain set. An online consensus meeting was held to discuss and resolve undecided candidate domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 100 people (75 health professionals and 25 people with ankle OA) from 18 countries (4 continents) participated in this study. Five domains reached consensus for inclusion in a core domain set for ankle OA – pain severity, health-related quality of life, function, disability and ankle range of motion. Twenty-one candidate domains reached agreement not to be included in the core domain set, and three domains remained undecided (ankle instability, physical capacity, and mental health).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This international consensus study, which included people with ankle OA and health professionals, has established a core domain set for ankle OA with five domains that should be measured and reported in all ankle OA trials – pain severity, health-related quality of life, function, disability and ankle range of motion. This core domain set will guide the reporting of outcomes in clinical trials on ankle OA. Future research should determine which outcome measurement instruments should be used to measure each of the core domains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"32 11","pages":"Pages 1481-1491"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424013104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To develop an internationally agreed-upon core domain set for ankle osteoarthritis (OA).
Methods
In a three-part Delphi process, a group of multidisciplinary health professionals with expertise in ankle OA and people with ankle OA responded to online questionnaires. The questionnaires proposed a list of 29 candidate domains derived from a systematic review of ankle OA research, and interviews with people with ankle OA and health professionals. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement in people with ankle OA and health professionals whether a domain should or should not be included in a core domain set. An online consensus meeting was held to discuss and resolve undecided candidate domains.
Results
A total of 100 people (75 health professionals and 25 people with ankle OA) from 18 countries (4 continents) participated in this study. Five domains reached consensus for inclusion in a core domain set for ankle OA – pain severity, health-related quality of life, function, disability and ankle range of motion. Twenty-one candidate domains reached agreement not to be included in the core domain set, and three domains remained undecided (ankle instability, physical capacity, and mental health).
Conclusion
This international consensus study, which included people with ankle OA and health professionals, has established a core domain set for ankle OA with five domains that should be measured and reported in all ankle OA trials – pain severity, health-related quality of life, function, disability and ankle range of motion. This core domain set will guide the reporting of outcomes in clinical trials on ankle OA. Future research should determine which outcome measurement instruments should be used to measure each of the core domains.
目的:为踝关节骨关节炎(OA)制定一套国际公认的核心领域:为踝关节骨关节炎(OA)制定一套国际公认的核心领域:在一个由三部分组成的德尔菲过程中,一组具有踝关节 OA 方面专业知识的多学科医疗专业人士和踝关节 OA 患者对在线问卷做出了回答。调查问卷提出了一份 29 个候选领域的清单,这些领域来自于对踝关节 OA 研究的系统回顾,以及对踝关节 OA 患者和医疗专业人员的访谈。共识的先验定义是,踝关节OA患者和医疗专业人员对某一领域是否应纳入核心领域集的共识度≥70%:共有来自 18 个国家(4 大洲)的 100 人(75 名医疗专业人员和 25 名踝关节 OA 患者)参与了这项研究。有五个领域达成了纳入踝关节 OA 核心领域集的共识:疼痛严重程度、与健康相关的生活质量、功能、残疾和踝关节活动范围。21个候选领域达成共识,不纳入核心领域集,3个领域仍未确定(踝关节不稳定性、体能和心理健康):这项国际共识研究包括了踝关节 OA 患者和医疗专业人员,它确立了踝关节 OA 核心领域集,所有踝关节 OA 试验都应测量和报告这五个领域--疼痛严重程度、与健康相关的生活质量、功能、残疾和踝关节活动范围。该核心领域集将指导踝关节 OA 临床试验结果的报告。未来的研究应确定应使用哪些结果测量工具来测量每个核心领域。
期刊介绍:
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.