Between dissonance and confusion: When the Nutri-Score as a nutritional signal is misinterpreted

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102677
Valérie Hémar-Nicolas, Nathalie Guichard, Amélie Clauzel
{"title":"Between dissonance and confusion: When the Nutri-Score as a nutritional signal is misinterpreted","authors":"Valérie Hémar-Nicolas,&nbsp;Nathalie Guichard,&nbsp;Amélie Clauzel","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The introduction of a mandatory front-of-package nutrition label across the European Union is generating fierce controversy. Specifically, the Nutri-Score has been under debate, which has been reflected in the media. Drawing on signaling theory, this article aims to investigate how some consumers make sense of the Nutri-Score as a signal of nutritional quality in this noisy environment. First, a study analyzes how the media communicates about the Nutri-Score. Second, 15 semi-structured interviews examine how women with children interpret and use the Nutri-Score. Our findings show that media coverage of the Nutri-Score becomes ambiguous over time and that these women experience confusion due to cognitive dissonance and lack of knowledge. This article contributes to the literature on nutrition labeling and highlights the risks of confusion in interpreting this signal of nutritional quality. It suggests implications for policymakers and economic actors to promote the use of the Nutri-Score while reducing information asymmetry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 102677"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000885","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction of a mandatory front-of-package nutrition label across the European Union is generating fierce controversy. Specifically, the Nutri-Score has been under debate, which has been reflected in the media. Drawing on signaling theory, this article aims to investigate how some consumers make sense of the Nutri-Score as a signal of nutritional quality in this noisy environment. First, a study analyzes how the media communicates about the Nutri-Score. Second, 15 semi-structured interviews examine how women with children interpret and use the Nutri-Score. Our findings show that media coverage of the Nutri-Score becomes ambiguous over time and that these women experience confusion due to cognitive dissonance and lack of knowledge. This article contributes to the literature on nutrition labeling and highlights the risks of confusion in interpreting this signal of nutritional quality. It suggests implications for policymakers and economic actors to promote the use of the Nutri-Score while reducing information asymmetry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介于不和谐与混乱之间:当营养成分作为一种营养信号被误读时
在欧盟范围内推行强制性包装正面营养标签引发了激烈的争议。具体而言,"营养成分"(Nutri-Score)一直备受争议,媒体也对此有所反映。本文以信号理论为基础,旨在研究在这种嘈杂的环境中,一些消费者是如何理解作为营养质量信号的 Nutri-Score 的。首先,研究分析了媒体是如何传播营养成分的。其次,15 个半结构式访谈考察了有孩子的妇女如何解释和使用营养成分。我们的研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,媒体对 Nutri-Score 的报道变得模棱两可,这些妇女由于认知失调和缺乏知识而感到困惑。这篇文章为有关营养标签的文献做出了贡献,并强调了在解释这一营养质量信号时出现混淆的风险。文章对政策制定者和经济行为者在减少信息不对称的同时促进营养成分的使用提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Viewpoint: Toward a sustainable Green Revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of maize and rice Expanding the phytosanitary exclusion zone for Mexican avocados: Market impacts and unintended consequences Small wins in practice: Learnings from 16 European initiatives working towards the transformation of urban food systems Information interventions and willingness to pay for PICS bags: Evidence from Sierra Leone Do moral constraints and government interventions promote the willingness and behaviors of food saving among urban residents in China? An empirical study based on structural equation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1