Is knowledge really the most important strategic resource? A meta‐analytic review

IF 6.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Strategic Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1002/smj.3645
Donald D. Bergh, Laura D'Oria, T. Russell Crook, Ashley Roccapriore
{"title":"Is knowledge really the most important strategic resource? A meta‐analytic review","authors":"Donald D. Bergh, Laura D'Oria, T. Russell Crook, Ashley Roccapriore","doi":"10.1002/smj.3645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research SummaryThe knowledge‐based view (KBV) claims that knowledge is the most important strategic resource because it is the strongest determinant of firm competitive advantage and the glue that pulls resources together. We examine this assertion through a meta‐analysis of the accumulated evidence on the relationships among strategic resources and firm performance (stock market, financial performance, and growth). Findings from 348 samples reporting 248,136 firm‐level observations show that knowledge resources have the highest positive association with all three performance dimensions, with the highest positive relationship with growth, followed by market and then financial performance. Further, knowledge may serve as a foundational resource by augmenting other strategic resources and helping make firms different. These findings support the KBV's core prediction that knowledge resources offer superior strategic value.Managerial SummaryManagers need to understand what resources yield the strongest and most consistent returns. We examined the often‐invoked claim that knowledge is the most important resource associated with firm success. Our study combines evidence from over 300 samples and finds that knowledge‐based resources are consistently associated with the strongest profit, stock market, and growth returns relative to other types of resource investments. For managers, the message is clear—acquire, integrate, retain, and motivate knowledge‐related resources because doing so pays off.","PeriodicalId":22023,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research SummaryThe knowledge‐based view (KBV) claims that knowledge is the most important strategic resource because it is the strongest determinant of firm competitive advantage and the glue that pulls resources together. We examine this assertion through a meta‐analysis of the accumulated evidence on the relationships among strategic resources and firm performance (stock market, financial performance, and growth). Findings from 348 samples reporting 248,136 firm‐level observations show that knowledge resources have the highest positive association with all three performance dimensions, with the highest positive relationship with growth, followed by market and then financial performance. Further, knowledge may serve as a foundational resource by augmenting other strategic resources and helping make firms different. These findings support the KBV's core prediction that knowledge resources offer superior strategic value.Managerial SummaryManagers need to understand what resources yield the strongest and most consistent returns. We examined the often‐invoked claim that knowledge is the most important resource associated with firm success. Our study combines evidence from over 300 samples and finds that knowledge‐based resources are consistently associated with the strongest profit, stock market, and growth returns relative to other types of resource investments. For managers, the message is clear—acquire, integrate, retain, and motivate knowledge‐related resources because doing so pays off.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识真的是最重要的战略资源吗?元分析综述
研究摘要 基于知识的观点(KBV)认为,知识是最重要的战略资源,因为它是企业竞争优势最有力的决定因素,也是将各种资源凝聚在一起的粘合剂。我们通过对战略资源与公司业绩(股票市场、财务业绩和增长)之间关系的累积证据进行元分析,对这一论断进行了研究。从 348 个样本报告的 248,136 个公司层面观察结果来看,知识资源与所有三个绩效维度的正相关性最高,其中与增长的正相关性最高,其次是市场绩效,再次是财务绩效。此外,知识可以作为一种基础资源,增强其他战略资源,帮助企业与众不同。这些发现支持了 KBV 的核心预测,即知识资源具有卓越的战略价值。我们对知识是与企业成功相关的最重要资源这一经常被提及的说法进行了研究。我们的研究综合了 300 多个样本的证据,发现与其他类型的资源投资相比,知识型资源始终与最丰厚的利润、股市和增长回报相关联。对于管理者来说,信息是明确的--获取、整合、保留和激励与知识相关的资源,因为这样做是有回报的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.40%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: At the Strategic Management Journal, we are committed to publishing top-tier research that addresses key questions in the field of strategic management and captivates scholars in this area. Our publication welcomes manuscripts covering a wide range of topics, perspectives, and research methodologies. As a result, our editorial decisions truly embrace the diversity inherent in the field.
期刊最新文献
Curating 1000 flowers as they bloom: Leveraging pluralistic initiatives to diffuse social innovations Economic nationalism and the home court advantage Fading corporate survival prospects: Impact of co‐selection bias in resource allocation on strategic intent Rewiring the organizational network: Corporate offsites and network tie formation Political competition and the rechanneling of corporate bribery into politically connected charity donations: Evidence from South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1