Concealed firearm carrying laws and defensive firearm use in public locations of US metropolitan areas, 1986-2004.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1136/ip-2024-045257
Christopher S Koper, Yi-Fang Lu, Beidi Dong
{"title":"Concealed firearm carrying laws and defensive firearm use in public locations of US metropolitan areas, 1986-2004.","authors":"Christopher S Koper, Yi-Fang Lu, Beidi Dong","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There has been extensive debate in the USA as to how laws regulating the carrying of concealed firearms affect crime and public safety. This study examines whether US state laws making it easier for civilians to obtain permits to carry concealed handguns in public increase defensive gun uses against violent threats and attacks in public.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used National Crime Victimization Survey data from 39 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the USA over a 19-year period (1986-2004) to examine whether laws making it easier for civilians to obtain concealed carry permits are linked to higher levels of defensive gun use against violence in public spaces of metropolitan areas. Bivariate χ<sup>2</sup> tests and multivariate logistic regression models (controlling for actor and situational characteristics) were used with 7196 public incidents to examine whether the likelihood of the victim using a gun against an attacker(s) varied based on the type of concealed carry law in the MSA at the time of the incident.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of self-defensive gun use in this sample was not clearly related to the passage of permissive gun carrying laws. Although defensive gun use was more common in MSAs with permissive gun carrying laws, this difference was not consistently related in magnitude or statistical significance to the passage of those laws or the length of time they had been in effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Permissive concealed carry permit laws do not produce evident increases in self-defensive gun uses against crime in public locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There has been extensive debate in the USA as to how laws regulating the carrying of concealed firearms affect crime and public safety. This study examines whether US state laws making it easier for civilians to obtain permits to carry concealed handguns in public increase defensive gun uses against violent threats and attacks in public.

Methods: We used National Crime Victimization Survey data from 39 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the USA over a 19-year period (1986-2004) to examine whether laws making it easier for civilians to obtain concealed carry permits are linked to higher levels of defensive gun use against violence in public spaces of metropolitan areas. Bivariate χ2 tests and multivariate logistic regression models (controlling for actor and situational characteristics) were used with 7196 public incidents to examine whether the likelihood of the victim using a gun against an attacker(s) varied based on the type of concealed carry law in the MSA at the time of the incident.

Results: The prevalence of self-defensive gun use in this sample was not clearly related to the passage of permissive gun carrying laws. Although defensive gun use was more common in MSAs with permissive gun carrying laws, this difference was not consistently related in magnitude or statistical significance to the passage of those laws or the length of time they had been in effect.

Conclusions: Permissive concealed carry permit laws do not produce evident increases in self-defensive gun uses against crime in public locations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1986-2004 年美国大都会地区公共场所隐蔽性枪支携带法和防卫性枪支使用情况。
目的:在美国,关于规范隐蔽携带枪支的法律如何影响犯罪和公共安全的争论一直很激烈。本研究探讨了美国各州的法律是否会使平民更容易获得在公共场合隐蔽携带手枪的许可,从而增加防卫性枪支的使用,以应对公共场合的暴力威胁和袭击:我们使用了美国 39 个大都市统计区(MSA)19 年间(1986-2004 年)的全国犯罪受害情况调查数据,以研究让平民更容易获得隐蔽携带许可证的法律是否与大都市公共场所针对暴力的防卫性枪支使用水平提高有关。通过对 7196 起公共事件进行二元χ2 检验和多变量逻辑回归模型(控制行为人和情境特征),研究受害者使用枪支对抗攻击者的可能性是否会因事件发生时澳门金沙线上领彩金网隐蔽持枪法的类型而有所不同:在该样本中,使用枪支自卫的普遍程度与允许携带枪支法律的通过没有明显关系。虽然在有允许携带枪支法律的澳门金沙线上领彩金网地区,自卫性使用枪支的情况更为普遍,但这种差异的大小或统计意义与这些法律的通过或生效时间的长短并不一致:结论:允许隐蔽持枪许可的法律并不会明显增加公共场所针对犯罪的自卫用枪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
期刊最新文献
Association of veteran suicide risk with state-level firearm ownership rates and firearm laws in the USA. Ankle sprains in male Israeli infantry soldiers during training: prevalence and risk factors. Continuum of health equity practice and science: conceptualising health equity research and practice for injury prevention. User-driven instructions reduce errors in child restraint use: a randomised controlled trial in Sydney, Australia. Core outcome set for intervention research on snakebite envenomation in South Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1