The Pattern of Physique Preferences on Gay Dating App "Blued" in China: A Multiple Group Latent Class Analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Sex Research Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1080/00224499.2024.2380735
Lijun Zheng, Jiatong Xu
{"title":"The Pattern of Physique Preferences on Gay Dating App \"Blued\" in China: A Multiple Group Latent Class Analysis.","authors":"Lijun Zheng, Jiatong Xu","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2024.2380735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have indicated homogamy in partner preferences among gay and bisexual men. Individuals on Blued (the most popular gay dating app in China) could identify their body type and preferred physiques according to six categories: monkey (thin gay men), average, muscularity, bear (heavy and hairy gay men), baboon (smaller than bears), and pig (plumper than bears). This study examined patterns of physique preferences across body types as well as sexual self-labels (tops, bottoms, versatiles, and others). In total, 188,716 Blued profiles (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 31.1, <i>SD</i> = 7.1) were obtained. Multiple group latent class analysis was used to examine the patterns of physique preferences across the body type groups. The results revealed seven classes of physique preference. The four common physique preferences shared by all body type groups were \"like averages,\" \"like monkeys,\" \"like muscularity,\" and \"like bears.\" Individuals with a monkey or average body type exhibited a specific pattern of physique preference: \"dislike bears.\" The two physique preferences specific to gay bear men were \"like averages and muscularity,\" and \"dislike monkeys.\" The highest preference for each physique was observed among individuals of the same body type. Furthermore, tops were more likely to have a muscular body and prefer a monkey physique, whereas bottoms were more likely to have a monkey body and prefer a muscular physique. These findings indicate body type-specific physique preferences based on an individual's own body type and sexual self-label identification, thus partially supporting the concept of homogamy in the physique preferences of gay men.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2380735","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated homogamy in partner preferences among gay and bisexual men. Individuals on Blued (the most popular gay dating app in China) could identify their body type and preferred physiques according to six categories: monkey (thin gay men), average, muscularity, bear (heavy and hairy gay men), baboon (smaller than bears), and pig (plumper than bears). This study examined patterns of physique preferences across body types as well as sexual self-labels (tops, bottoms, versatiles, and others). In total, 188,716 Blued profiles (Mage = 31.1, SD = 7.1) were obtained. Multiple group latent class analysis was used to examine the patterns of physique preferences across the body type groups. The results revealed seven classes of physique preference. The four common physique preferences shared by all body type groups were "like averages," "like monkeys," "like muscularity," and "like bears." Individuals with a monkey or average body type exhibited a specific pattern of physique preference: "dislike bears." The two physique preferences specific to gay bear men were "like averages and muscularity," and "dislike monkeys." The highest preference for each physique was observed among individuals of the same body type. Furthermore, tops were more likely to have a muscular body and prefer a monkey physique, whereas bottoms were more likely to have a monkey body and prefer a muscular physique. These findings indicate body type-specific physique preferences based on an individual's own body type and sexual self-label identification, thus partially supporting the concept of homogamy in the physique preferences of gay men.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国同志交友软件 "Blued "上的体型偏好模式:多组潜类分析
以往的研究表明,男同性恋和双性恋的伴侣偏好具有同质性。Blued(中国最受欢迎的男同性恋交友软件)上的用户可以根据猴子(瘦弱的男同性恋)、平均水平、肌肉发达、熊(体重大且多毛的男同性恋)、狒狒(比熊小)和猪(比熊丰满)这六类体型来识别自己的体型和偏好的体型。这项研究考察了不同体型的体格偏好模式以及性自我标签(上位者、下位者、多面者及其他)。总共获得了 188716 份蓝皮肤档案(Mage = 31.1,SD = 7.1)。我们采用了多组潜类分析法来研究不同体型组的体型偏好模式。结果显示了七种体型偏好。所有体型组共有的四种体型偏好分别是 "像平均值"、"像猴子"、"像肌肉发达 "和 "像熊"。猴子体型或平均体型的个体表现出一种特殊的体型偏好模式:"不喜欢熊熊型男同性恋特有的两种体型偏好是 "喜欢平均体型和肌肉发达 "和 "不喜欢猴子"。在相同体型的个体中,对每种体型的偏好程度最高。此外,上位者更有可能拥有肌肉发达的体型并喜欢猴子体型,而下位者更有可能拥有猴子体型并喜欢肌肉发达的体型。这些研究结果表明,特定体型的体型偏好基于个体自身的体型和性自我标签认同,因此部分支持了男同性恋者体型偏好中的同性性行为概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
期刊最新文献
"It Felt Sexually Liberating": An Examination of How Black Women's Awareness of Kink and BDSM Informs Their Sex Lives. Cross-Cultural Validation of the Sexual Desire Inventory (SDI-2) in 42 Countries and 26 Languages. Development and Validation of a Measure of the Resolution Phase of the Sexual Response Cycle: The Sexual Resolution Scale (SRS). Toward a Typology of the Client: A Latent Class Analysis Approach to the Consumption of Sex Work in the United States. Developing a Scale Measuring Comprehensive Sex Education Attitudes in K-12 Schools (CSEA-K12).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1