[Inter-arm blood pressure difference: Consecutive versus simultaneous measurements in treated and controlled hypertense patients].

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.hipert.2024.06.005
A Delucchi, D Fernández, M Sorini, P Reisin, M Scarabino, P Rodríguez
{"title":"[Inter-arm blood pressure difference: Consecutive versus simultaneous measurements in treated and controlled hypertense patients].","authors":"A Delucchi, D Fernández, M Sorini, P Reisin, M Scarabino, P Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.hipert.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The inter-arm difference (IAD) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with higher cardiovascular risk. We compared simultaneous and consecutive recordings in measuring IAD of SBP, and evaluated reproducibility between visits. 143 hypertensive patients (63.8±9.5 years, 51.7% women) treated and controlled with stable antihypertensive medication for a period of ≥3 months were included. Blood pressure (BP) in both arms was measured simultaneously and consecutively with an automatic oscillometric device, in two visits. The IAD of the simultaneous SBP was significantly lower compared to the consecutive one, both in the first (3.51±4.1 vs. 4.40±3.7mmHg; P<.01) and in the second visit (3.62±3.5 vs. 5.69±5.1mmHg; P<.001). When the IAD of SBP was categorized as ≥10 or <10mmHg, the reproducibility between visits was insignificant in both simultaneous measurements and consecutive measurements. The frequency of initial dominance was similar between the left and right arm in simultaneous ones (46.2 vs. 43.3%), and greater in the right arm in consecutive ones (55.2 vs. 38.5). The persistence of dominance between both visits was significantly higher when SBP was measured simultaneously (54.4% vs. 45.5%; P<.01). Our study shows that to define the arm with the highest BP, simultaneous measurements are preferable. In treated and controlled hypertensive patients, the poor persistence of initial dominance between visits requires us to review the recommendation of recording, during follow-up, the BP in the arm where it was highest on the first visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":39403,"journal":{"name":"Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hipert.2024.06.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inter-arm difference (IAD) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with higher cardiovascular risk. We compared simultaneous and consecutive recordings in measuring IAD of SBP, and evaluated reproducibility between visits. 143 hypertensive patients (63.8±9.5 years, 51.7% women) treated and controlled with stable antihypertensive medication for a period of ≥3 months were included. Blood pressure (BP) in both arms was measured simultaneously and consecutively with an automatic oscillometric device, in two visits. The IAD of the simultaneous SBP was significantly lower compared to the consecutive one, both in the first (3.51±4.1 vs. 4.40±3.7mmHg; P<.01) and in the second visit (3.62±3.5 vs. 5.69±5.1mmHg; P<.001). When the IAD of SBP was categorized as ≥10 or <10mmHg, the reproducibility between visits was insignificant in both simultaneous measurements and consecutive measurements. The frequency of initial dominance was similar between the left and right arm in simultaneous ones (46.2 vs. 43.3%), and greater in the right arm in consecutive ones (55.2 vs. 38.5). The persistence of dominance between both visits was significantly higher when SBP was measured simultaneously (54.4% vs. 45.5%; P<.01). Our study shows that to define the arm with the highest BP, simultaneous measurements are preferable. In treated and controlled hypertensive patients, the poor persistence of initial dominance between visits requires us to review the recommendation of recording, during follow-up, the BP in the arm where it was highest on the first visit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[臂间血压差:治疗和控制高血压患者的连续测量与同步测量]。
收缩压(SBP)的臂间差(IAD)与较高的心血管风险有关。我们比较了同时和连续记录 SBP 的 IAD 测量值,并评估了各次访问之间的重现性。共纳入 143 名高血压患者(63.8±9.5 岁,51.7% 为女性),这些患者均接受过稳定的降压药物治疗,且控制时间≥3 个月。两组患者的血压(BP)均由自动示波仪同时连续测量,分两次进行。同时测量的 SBP 的 IAD 值明显低于连续测量的 SBP 的 IAD 值(3.51±4.1 vs. 4.40±3.7 mmHg; P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular
Hipertension y Riesgo Vascular Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: La mejor publicación para mantenerse al día en los avances de la lucha contra esta patología. Incluye artículos de Investigación, Originales, Revisiones, Casos clínicos, Aplicación práctica y Resúmenes comentados a la bibliografía internacional. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad española de Hipertensión-Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial.
期刊最新文献
[Peculiarities in the management of arterial hypertension in the elderly: Consensus document of the Central American and Caribbean Society of arterial hypertension]. Update on the diagnosis of the pheochromocytoma. [Arterial stiffness detection in women with recent history of pre-eclampsia]. [Design and rationale: Observational Study of the Argentine Group for the Study of Lipoprotein (a)]. Metastatic pheochromocytoma: An unusual case and its multidisciplinary management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1