Evaluation of the efficacy of labor induction with vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk pregnant women population.

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) Pub Date : 2024-07-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20240132
Letícia Sampaio Vilas-Boas, Marcos Paulo Ribeiro Sanches, Edward Araujo Júnior, Alberto Borges Peixoto, Rosiane Mattar, Leandra Rejane Rodrigues Dos Santos, David Baptista da Silva Pares, Sue Yasaki Sun
{"title":"Evaluation of the efficacy of labor induction with vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk pregnant women population.","authors":"Letícia Sampaio Vilas-Boas, Marcos Paulo Ribeiro Sanches, Edward Araujo Júnior, Alberto Borges Peixoto, Rosiane Mattar, Leandra Rejane Rodrigues Dos Santos, David Baptista da Silva Pares, Sue Yasaki Sun","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20240132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate and predictors of labor induction using vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk pregnant women population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was carried out with 196 pregnant women. Groups 2 and 4 of the Robson Classification admitted for induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol (25 μg tablets every 6 h, up to 4 tablets, for a maximum of 24 h). The success of labor induction was considered the achievement of vaginal delivery. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the best predictors of successful induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all the pregnant women analyzed, 140 (71.4%) were successful and 56 (28.6%) were unsuccessful. Pregnant women who achieved successful induction had a higher number of pregnancies (1.69 vs. 1.36, p=0.023), a higher number of deliveries (0.57 vs. 0.19, p<0.001), a higher Bishop score (2.0 vs. 1.38, p=0.002), and lower misoprostol 25 μg tablets (2.18 vs. 2.57, p=0.031). No previous deliveries [x2(1)=3.14, odds ratio (OR): 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-0.57, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.91, p=0.001] and the presence of one previous delivery [x2(1)=6.0, OR: 3.40, 95% CI: 1.13-10.16, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.043, p=0.029] were significant predictors of successful induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high rate of labor induction success using vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk population was observed, mainly in multiparous and with gestational age>41 weeks. No previous delivery decreased the success of labor induction, while one previous delivery increased the success of labor induction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94194,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20240132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate and predictors of labor induction using vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk pregnant women population.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out with 196 pregnant women. Groups 2 and 4 of the Robson Classification admitted for induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol (25 μg tablets every 6 h, up to 4 tablets, for a maximum of 24 h). The success of labor induction was considered the achievement of vaginal delivery. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the best predictors of successful induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol.

Results: Of all the pregnant women analyzed, 140 (71.4%) were successful and 56 (28.6%) were unsuccessful. Pregnant women who achieved successful induction had a higher number of pregnancies (1.69 vs. 1.36, p=0.023), a higher number of deliveries (0.57 vs. 0.19, p<0.001), a higher Bishop score (2.0 vs. 1.38, p=0.002), and lower misoprostol 25 μg tablets (2.18 vs. 2.57, p=0.031). No previous deliveries [x2(1)=3.14, odds ratio (OR): 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-0.57, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.91, p=0.001] and the presence of one previous delivery [x2(1)=6.0, OR: 3.40, 95% CI: 1.13-10.16, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.043, p=0.029] were significant predictors of successful induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol.

Conclusion: A high rate of labor induction success using vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk population was observed, mainly in multiparous and with gestational age>41 weeks. No previous delivery decreased the success of labor induction, while one previous delivery increased the success of labor induction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估在低风险孕妇群体中使用阴道米索前列醇引产的疗效。
研究目的本研究旨在评估在低风险孕妇群体中使用阴道米索前列醇引产的成功率和预测因素:方法:对 196 名孕妇进行了前瞻性队列研究。方法:对 196 名孕妇进行了前瞻性队列研究,其中包括罗布森分类法第 2 组和第 4 组,她们均接受了阴道米索前列醇引产(25 μg 片剂,每 6 小时一次,最多 4 片,最长 24 小时)。引产成功被认为是实现了阴道分娩。二元逻辑回归用于确定阴道用米索前列醇引产成功的最佳预测因素:在所有接受分析的孕妇中,140 人(71.4%)引产成功,56 人(28.6%)引产失败。引产成功的孕妇怀孕次数较多(1.69 对 1.36,P=0.023),分娩次数较多(0.57 对 0.19,P=0.023):在低风险人群中观察到,使用阴道米索前列醇引产的成功率很高,主要是多产妇和胎龄大于 41 周的产妇。未分娩过的产妇引产成功率较低,而分娩过一次的产妇引产成功率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effect of intramuscular injection from two different sites on pain and fear in children: a randomized controlled study. Influencing factors of intrapartum fever after epidural labor analgesia. Prevalence and associated factors of mother-reported jaundice in newborns. The utility of albumin-bilirubin score in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a retrospective comparative study. Comments on "The role of serum adropin in determining the clinical outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury: a case-control study".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1