Comparison of the crystal structures of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib and its hydrate and phosphate.

Abstract

Ruxolitinib {RUX; systematic name: (3R)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propanenitrile, C₁₇H₁₈N₆} is an orally bioavailable JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for treating intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) and high-risk polycythemia vera (PV). Recent patents claim that RUX can exist in many different forms, information for which is important for the clinical utilization of RUX, especially for the formulation and bioavailability of the drug. But there has been no detailed study on its forms so far. Herein crystals of RUX and its dihydrate (RUX-2H; C₁₇H₁₈N₆·2H₂O) and phosphate (RUX-P; systematic name: 4-{1-[(1R)-2-cyano-1-cyclopentylethyl]-1H-pyrazol-4-yl}-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-3-ium dihydrogen phosphate, C₁₇H₁₉N₆⁺·H₂PO₄^-) were prepared successfully and their structures studied in detail for the first time. Our study shows that the three crystals of RUX differ in the orientation of the pyrimidine ring relative to the pyrazole ring of the RUX molecule, and in their hydrogen-bond interactions. The water molecules in RUX-2H and the dihydrogen phosphate anion in RUX-P enrich the hydrogen-bond networks in these forms. The expected proton transfer occurs in RUX phosphate and the protonated N atom is engaged in a charge-assisted hydrogen bond with the counter-anion. Hydrogen-bonding interactions dominate in the crystal packing of the three forms. The detailed conformations and packing of the three forms were compared through the calculation of both Hirshfeld surfaces and fingerprint plots.