Safia Spink, Daniel Gillett, Sarah Heard, Ines Harper, Ruth Casey, Luigi Aloj
{"title":"Estimation of kidney doses from [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE PRRT using single time point post-treatment SPECT/CT.","authors":"Safia Spink, Daniel Gillett, Sarah Heard, Ines Harper, Ruth Casey, Luigi Aloj","doi":"10.1186/s40658-024-00665-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dosimetry after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy can be demanding for both patients and the clinical service due to the need for imaging at several time points. In this work we compare three methods of single time point (STP) kidney dosimetry after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy with a multiple time point (MTP) dosimetry method.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Method 1 (MTP): Kidney doses were calculated from 31 patients including 107 therapy cycles. Post-therapy SPECT images were acquired on day 0, 4 and 7 along with a CT scan on day 4. A mono-exponential fit was used to calculate kidney doses using cycle specific data. Method 2 (Consistent effective half-life): The effective half-life [Formula: see text] calculated in cycle 1 was assumed consistent for subsequent cycles of therapy and the activity scaled using a single day 3-5 SPECT/CT. Methods 3 and 4 (Hänscheid and Madsen approximations): The Hänscheid approximation and Madsen approximation were both evaluated using a single SPECT/CT acquired on day 0, 4 and 7. All STP methods were compared to the MTP method for accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the MTP method, mean right and left kidney doses were calculated to be 2.9 ± 1.1 Gy and 2.8 ± 0.9 Gy respectively and the population [Formula: see text] was 56 ± 13 h. For the consistent [Formula: see text], Hänscheid and Madsen methods, the percentage of results within ± 20% of MTP method were 96% (n = 70), 95% (n = 80) and 94% (n = 80) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three single time point methods had > 94% of results within ± 20% of the MTP method, however the consistent [Formula: see text] method resulted in the highest alignment with the MTP method and is the only method which allows for calculation of the patient-specific [Formula: see text]. If only a single scan can be performed, day 4 is optimal for kidney dosimetry where the Hänscheid or Madsen approximation can be implemented with good accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"11 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00665-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dosimetry after [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy can be demanding for both patients and the clinical service due to the need for imaging at several time points. In this work we compare three methods of single time point (STP) kidney dosimetry after [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy with a multiple time point (MTP) dosimetry method.
Method: Method 1 (MTP): Kidney doses were calculated from 31 patients including 107 therapy cycles. Post-therapy SPECT images were acquired on day 0, 4 and 7 along with a CT scan on day 4. A mono-exponential fit was used to calculate kidney doses using cycle specific data. Method 2 (Consistent effective half-life): The effective half-life [Formula: see text] calculated in cycle 1 was assumed consistent for subsequent cycles of therapy and the activity scaled using a single day 3-5 SPECT/CT. Methods 3 and 4 (Hänscheid and Madsen approximations): The Hänscheid approximation and Madsen approximation were both evaluated using a single SPECT/CT acquired on day 0, 4 and 7. All STP methods were compared to the MTP method for accuracy.
Results: Using the MTP method, mean right and left kidney doses were calculated to be 2.9 ± 1.1 Gy and 2.8 ± 0.9 Gy respectively and the population [Formula: see text] was 56 ± 13 h. For the consistent [Formula: see text], Hänscheid and Madsen methods, the percentage of results within ± 20% of MTP method were 96% (n = 70), 95% (n = 80) and 94% (n = 80) respectively.
Conclusion: All three single time point methods had > 94% of results within ± 20% of the MTP method, however the consistent [Formula: see text] method resulted in the highest alignment with the MTP method and is the only method which allows for calculation of the patient-specific [Formula: see text]. If only a single scan can be performed, day 4 is optimal for kidney dosimetry where the Hänscheid or Madsen approximation can be implemented with good accuracy.
期刊介绍:
EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.