Value of green sign and chicken skin aspects for detecting malignancy of colorectal neoplasia in a prospective characterization study.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-07-25 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2350-9631
Pierre Lafeuille, Jérôme Rivory, Alexandru Lupu, Florian Rostain, Jeremie Jacques, Thimothee Wallenhorst, Adrien Bartoli, Serge Torti, Tanguy Fenouil, Frederic Moll, Fabien Subtil, Mathieu Pioche
{"title":"Value of green sign and chicken skin aspects for detecting malignancy of colorectal neoplasia in a prospective characterization study.","authors":"Pierre Lafeuille, Jérôme Rivory, Alexandru Lupu, Florian Rostain, Jeremie Jacques, Thimothee Wallenhorst, Adrien Bartoli, Serge Torti, Tanguy Fenouil, Frederic Moll, Fabien Subtil, Mathieu Pioche","doi":"10.1055/a-2350-9631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Accurate endoscopic characterization of colorectal lesions is essential for predicting histology but is difficult even for experts. Simple criteria could help endoscopists to detect and predict malignancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the green sign and chicken skin aspects in detection of malignant colorectal neoplasia. <b>Patients and methods</b> We prospectively characterized and evaluated the histology of all consecutive colorectal lesions detected during screening or referred for endoscopic resection (Pro-CONECCT study). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the green sign and chicken skin aspects for detection of superficial and deep invasive lesions. <b>Results</b> 461 patients with 803 colorectal lesions were included. The green sign had a negative predictive value of 89.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.1%-91.8%) and 98.1% (95% CI 96.7%-99.0%) for superficial and deep invasive lesions, respectively. In contrast to chicken skin, the green sign showed additional value for detection of both lesion types compared with the CONECCT classification and chicken skin (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for superficial lesions 5.9; 95% CI 3.4-10.2; <i>P</i> <0.001), adjusted OR for deep lesions 9.0; 95% CI 3.9-21.1; <i>P</i> <0.001). <b>Conclusions</b> The green sign may be associated with malignant colorectal neoplasia. Targeting these areas before precise analysis of the lesion could be a way of improving detection of focal malignancies and prediction of the most severe histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E924-E931"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2350-9631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims Accurate endoscopic characterization of colorectal lesions is essential for predicting histology but is difficult even for experts. Simple criteria could help endoscopists to detect and predict malignancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the green sign and chicken skin aspects in detection of malignant colorectal neoplasia. Patients and methods We prospectively characterized and evaluated the histology of all consecutive colorectal lesions detected during screening or referred for endoscopic resection (Pro-CONECCT study). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the green sign and chicken skin aspects for detection of superficial and deep invasive lesions. Results 461 patients with 803 colorectal lesions were included. The green sign had a negative predictive value of 89.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.1%-91.8%) and 98.1% (95% CI 96.7%-99.0%) for superficial and deep invasive lesions, respectively. In contrast to chicken skin, the green sign showed additional value for detection of both lesion types compared with the CONECCT classification and chicken skin (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for superficial lesions 5.9; 95% CI 3.4-10.2; P <0.001), adjusted OR for deep lesions 9.0; 95% CI 3.9-21.1; P <0.001). Conclusions The green sign may be associated with malignant colorectal neoplasia. Targeting these areas before precise analysis of the lesion could be a way of improving detection of focal malignancies and prediction of the most severe histology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项前瞻性特征研究中,绿色征象和鸡皮征象对检测结直肠肿瘤恶性程度的价值。
背景和研究目的 对结直肠病变进行准确的内镜定性对于预测组织学至关重要,但即使是专家也很难做到。简单的标准可以帮助内镜医师检测和预测恶性肿瘤。本研究旨在评估绿色征和鸡皮征在检测恶性结直肠肿瘤方面的价值。患者和方法 我们对所有在筛查中发现或转诊进行内镜切除的连续结直肠病变进行了前瞻性特征描述和组织学评估(Pro-CONECCT 研究)。我们评估了绿色征和鸡皮征在检测表层和深层浸润性病变方面的诊断准确性。结果 共纳入 461 名患者,803 个结肠直肠病变。绿色征象对浅表和深部浸润性病变的阴性预测值分别为 89.6%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 87.1%-91.8%)和 98.1%(95% 置信区间 96.7%-99.0%)。与鸡皮相比,绿色征与 CONECCT 分类和鸡皮相比,对两种病变类型的检测都有额外价值(浅表病变的调整比值比 [OR] 为 5.9;95% CI 为 3.4-10.2;P P 结论 绿色征可能与恶性结直肠肿瘤有关。在对病变进行精确分析之前,锁定这些区域可能是提高病灶恶性肿瘤检测率和预测最严重组织学的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1