The effect of injury area on the success of treatment in digital nerve injury.

Abstract

Introduction: The main objective of the current study is to investigate variations in postoperative outcomes that follow digital nerve repair in Zone 1 and Zone 2, respectively. We hope that by carrying out this investigation, we will be able to identify which zone has better sensation recovery and patient-reported outcomes, allowing us to identify the best way of conducting surgery for specific types of injuries.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with digital nerve injuries treated in a designated hand surgery clinic between January 2021 and December 2023. The study was guided by ethical consideration, where all participants gave their informed consent. Surgical interventions involved primary repair, autograft/allograft nerve grafting, nonsurgical approaches, as well as conduit repair in which results were determined using objective measures and patient feedback.

Results: Direct repair emerged superior among injuries of Zone 1 and Zone 2 with high success rates and good patient-reported outcomes. In general, injuries in Zone 1 had better sensory recovery than injuries in Zone 2 and this was associated with higher levels of satisfaction. Comparisons using statistical methods confirmed that direct repair outperformed other modalities.

Conclusion: More importantly, the comparison of this study shows that repairs in Zone 1 are more successful than those in Zone 2 revealing direct repair as a superior method for digital nerve injuries. The difference is crucial because it suggests that surgical efficiency may depend on where the injury is. This means that direct repair should be given priority over the two zones, although surgeons will need to watch out for challenges related to Zone 2 injuries and adjust their strategies accordingly to obtain the best patient outcomes possible.