'What script am I meant to use?': a qualitative study in chronic primary pain.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-01-02 Print Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0101
Niamh Blythe, Carmel Hughes, Nigel D Hart
{"title":"'What script am I meant to use?': a qualitative study in chronic primary pain.","authors":"Niamh Blythe, Carmel Hughes, Nigel D Hart","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic primary pain (CPP) as a diagnosis has been introduced in the recent International Classification of Diseases, 11<sup>th</sup> Revision (ICD-11). CPP captures the <i>experience</i> of pain as the primary problem, without an underlying attributable cause. Dissemination of UK guidance regarding CPP represents the first time it has been recognised as a condition in its own right. Little is known about GP views concerning caring for patients with CPP, and how related guidance is viewed and applied in practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore GP perspectives in relation to caring for people with CPP, including challenges encountered and use of related guidelines in practice.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A UK-wide qualitative interview study in primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit 15 GP participants from England, Northern Ireland, Wales, and Scotland. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following three main themes were generated: (1) 'How to start? Problematic beginnings', which referred to difficulties regarding diagnosis; (2) 'Where to go? Mapping the management challenge'; and (3) 'How to get there? Navigating strategies and response', which explored GP awareness and acceptability of UK guidelines for chronic pain. Areas identified for potential improvement included increased access to non-pharmacological management (NPM) and secondary care services, support with deprescribing, and an expanded multidisciplinary team input.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPP is complex to both diagnose and manage. Although guidelines provide a useful framework, they pose challenges when translating into day-to-day practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic primary pain (CPP) as a diagnosis has been introduced in the recent International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11). CPP captures the experience of pain as the primary problem, without an underlying attributable cause. Dissemination of UK guidance regarding CPP represents the first time it has been recognised as a condition in its own right. Little is known about GP views concerning caring for patients with CPP, and how related guidance is viewed and applied in practice.

Aim: To explore GP perspectives in relation to caring for people with CPP, including challenges encountered and use of related guidelines in practice.

Design & setting: A UK-wide qualitative interview study in primary care.

Method: Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit 15 GP participants from England, Northern Ireland, Wales, and Scotland. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: The following three main themes were generated: (1) 'How to start? Problematic beginnings', which referred to difficulties regarding diagnosis; (2) 'Where to go? Mapping the management challenge'; and (3) 'How to get there? Navigating strategies and response', which explored GP awareness and acceptability of UK guidelines for chronic pain. Areas identified for potential improvement included increased access to non-pharmacological management (NPM) and secondary care services, support with deprescribing, and an expanded multidisciplinary team input.

Conclusion: CPP is complex to both diagnose and manage. Although guidelines provide a useful framework, they pose challenges when translating into day-to-day practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我该用什么脚本?":一项关于慢性原发性疼痛的定性研究。
背景:最近的《国际疾病分类》第 11 次修订版(ICD-11)引入了慢性原发性疼痛(CPP)这一诊断。慢性原发性疼痛(CPP)是以疼痛为主要问题,没有潜在的可归因原因。英国有关 CPP 指南的发布标志着 CPP 首次被视为一种独立的疾病。关于全科医生(GP)对护理 CPP 患者的看法,以及在实践中如何看待和应用相关指南,人们知之甚少。目的:探讨全科医生对护理 CPP 患者的看法,包括在实践中遇到的挑战和使用相关指南的情况:英国范围内的初级医疗定性访谈研究:方法:采用有目的抽样和滚雪球抽样,从英格兰、北爱尔兰、威尔士和苏格兰招募 15 名全科医生参与研究。进行了半结构式访谈,并使用反思性主题分析法进行了分析:产生了三大主题:(1)"如何开始?有问题的开端 "指的是诊断方面的困难;(2) "何去何从?绘制管理挑战图 "和 (3) "如何到达目的地?导航策略与应对",探讨了全科医生对英国慢性疼痛指南的认识和接受程度。确定的潜在改进领域包括增加获得国家预防机制和二级护理服务的机会、支持去处方化以及扩大多学科团队的投入:CPP 的诊断和管理都很复杂。尽管指南提供了一个有用的框架,但在转化为日常实践时仍面临挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle interventions for depression in primary care: a qualitative study. Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey. Adjusting primary-care funding by deprivation: a cross-sectional study of Lower layer Super Output Areas in England. Identifying impaired mental health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in general practice. Utilisation and consequences of CRP point-of-care-testing in primary care practices: a real-world multicentre observational study with 1740 patient cases in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1