Validation of the Indonesian Version of the Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS) Questionnaire.

Rini Gusya Liza, Yaslinda Yaunin, Yanwirasti, Rauza Sukma Rita, Amel Yanis, Yuliarni Syafrita, Jamsari, Rinang Mariko
{"title":"Validation of the Indonesian Version of the Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS) Questionnaire.","authors":"Rini Gusya Liza, Yaslinda Yaunin, Yanwirasti, Rauza Sukma Rita, Amel Yanis, Yuliarni Syafrita, Jamsari, Rinang Mariko","doi":"10.18502/ijps.v19i3.15806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This current study aimed to validate the Indonesian version of the Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS) questionnaire, which provides a better understanding of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) disorders. <b>Method</b> <b>:</b> The study used a cross-sectional design and involved 314 adolescents and young adults in high school or university. A stratified sampling method was used. All participants filled out the ISAS questionnaire. Data were analyzed for content validity, construct validity, item discrimination value, and internal consistency (Croncbach's α). The translation process was carried out using forward and back-translation methods. <b>Results:</b> The ISAS questionnaire consists of section I, the behavioral scale, and section II, the functional scale. For content validity, Aiken's V coefficient obtained for both scale sections I and II is in the range of 0.917 - 1. This result shows that all items on the scale have very good validity. Confirmatory Factor Analyses were carried out using Lisrel 8.80 software on section II, resulting in several goodness of fit values that were not good enough (χ<sup>2</sup> = 457.68; P < 0.000; df = 64; χ<sup>2</sup> / df = 7.151, RMSEA = 0.130) and several other values that are quite acceptable (CFI = 0.95; SRMS = 0.057; NFI = 0.95; GFI = 0.83). The factor loading from section II ranges from 0.43 - 0.91. The item discrimination value using the corrected item-total correlation of section I is in the range of 0.031 - 0.837 and section II ranges from 0.290 - 0.854. The reliability analysis values in section I and II of the ISAS are α = 0.527 and α = 0.966, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> This is the first study to have validated the Indonesian version of the ISAS questionnaire. The Indonesian version of the ISAS questionnaire is considered a valid and reliable instrument to assess NSSI disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":38866,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"19 3","pages":"306-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v19i3.15806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This current study aimed to validate the Indonesian version of the Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS) questionnaire, which provides a better understanding of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) disorders. Method : The study used a cross-sectional design and involved 314 adolescents and young adults in high school or university. A stratified sampling method was used. All participants filled out the ISAS questionnaire. Data were analyzed for content validity, construct validity, item discrimination value, and internal consistency (Croncbach's α). The translation process was carried out using forward and back-translation methods. Results: The ISAS questionnaire consists of section I, the behavioral scale, and section II, the functional scale. For content validity, Aiken's V coefficient obtained for both scale sections I and II is in the range of 0.917 - 1. This result shows that all items on the scale have very good validity. Confirmatory Factor Analyses were carried out using Lisrel 8.80 software on section II, resulting in several goodness of fit values that were not good enough (χ2 = 457.68; P < 0.000; df = 64; χ2 / df = 7.151, RMSEA = 0.130) and several other values that are quite acceptable (CFI = 0.95; SRMS = 0.057; NFI = 0.95; GFI = 0.83). The factor loading from section II ranges from 0.43 - 0.91. The item discrimination value using the corrected item-total correlation of section I is in the range of 0.031 - 0.837 and section II ranges from 0.290 - 0.854. The reliability analysis values in section I and II of the ISAS are α = 0.527 and α = 0.966, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first study to have validated the Indonesian version of the ISAS questionnaire. The Indonesian version of the ISAS questionnaire is considered a valid and reliable instrument to assess NSSI disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼版自伤陈述清单(ISAS)问卷的验证。
研究目的本研究旨在验证印尼版《关于自伤的陈述清单》(ISAS)问卷的有效性,该问卷有助于更好地了解非自杀性自伤(NSSI)障碍。方法:研究采用横断面设计,涉及 314 名高中或大学的青少年和年轻人。采用分层抽样法。所有参与者都填写了 ISAS 问卷。对数据进行了内容效度、结构效度、项目区分度和内部一致性(Croncbach's α)分析。翻译过程采用了正译和反译的方法。结果ISAS 问卷由第一部分行为量表和第二部分功能量表组成。在内容效度方面,量表第一部分和第二部分的艾肯 V 系数均在 0.917 - 1 之间。使用 Lisrel 8.80 软件对量表第二部分进行了确证因子分析,结果显示有几个拟合度值不够理想(χ2 = 457.68; P < 0.000; df = 64; χ2 / df = 7.151, RMSEA = 0.130),还有几个值是可以接受的(CFI = 0.95; SRMS = 0.057; NFI = 0.95; GFI = 0.83)。第二部分的因子负荷在 0.43 - 0.91 之间。使用校正后的项目-总相关,第一部分的项目区分度值在 0.031 - 0.837 之间,第二部分的项目区分度值在 0.290 - 0.854 之间。ISAS 第 I 和第 II 部分的信度分析值分别为 α = 0.527 和 α = 0.966。结论这是首次对印尼版 ISAS 问卷进行验证的研究。印尼版 ISAS 问卷被认为是评估 NSSI 疾病的有效而可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Effectiveness of Attention Process Training (APT) with Parenting Management Training (PMT) in Reducing Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. An Increased Need to Identify Protective Factors for Sexual Assault. Application of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in Children and Adolescents Psychotherapy: An Umbrella Review. Investigating Cortical Complexity in Mixed Dementia through Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses: A Resting-State EEG Study. Psychometric Properties of a Persian Version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in Iranian Soldiers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1