Feasibility of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty for Hump Nose Reduction in Asian Population.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2024.0055
Hong Ryul Jin, Yung Jin Jeon
{"title":"Feasibility of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty for Hump Nose Reduction in Asian Population.","authors":"Hong Ryul Jin, Yung Jin Jeon","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) has shown promise in Western populations for nasal hump reduction, but its feasibility and long-term outcomes in Asian individuals remain unexplored. <b>Objective:</b> To measure the feasibility, as well as the functional and aesthetic outcomes, of DPR in Asian hump noses and to determine its effectiveness in adaptation to the unique characteristics of the Asian demographic. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective review analyzed patients who underwent primary DPR between April 2019 and November 2022 with a follow-up period of over 12 months. The study included patients whose photographs met the criteria. Surgical techniques, aesthetic measurements using anthropometric factors, and subjective outcomes were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Of the 17 patients (11/17, 64.7% female), the mean age was 22.53 years (standard deviation [SD] 5.22 years). The median follow-up period was 36.90 months (range 13-61 months). Measurements from pre- and postoperative photographs showed a significant reduction in both nasofacial angle (7.76°, SD 4.30°) and rhinion angle (0.85°, SD 0.69°) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Patient-reported outcome scores with the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale decreased from 61.00 (SD 26.96) to 15.50 (SD 11.65), and Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey scores postoperatively were 10.90 (SD 7.71) overall, with the functional component at 3.50 (SD 2.64) and the aesthetic component at 7.40 (SD 6.24). No residual hump, recurrence of the hump, or complications were observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> In this study, the use of DPR techniques was effective and may support further development of the inclusion and exclusion criteria for its use in correcting the dorsal hump in Asian patients. Careful patient selection will be imperative to determine the ultimate indications for this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) has shown promise in Western populations for nasal hump reduction, but its feasibility and long-term outcomes in Asian individuals remain unexplored. Objective: To measure the feasibility, as well as the functional and aesthetic outcomes, of DPR in Asian hump noses and to determine its effectiveness in adaptation to the unique characteristics of the Asian demographic. Methods: A retrospective review analyzed patients who underwent primary DPR between April 2019 and November 2022 with a follow-up period of over 12 months. The study included patients whose photographs met the criteria. Surgical techniques, aesthetic measurements using anthropometric factors, and subjective outcomes were evaluated. Results: Of the 17 patients (11/17, 64.7% female), the mean age was 22.53 years (standard deviation [SD] 5.22 years). The median follow-up period was 36.90 months (range 13-61 months). Measurements from pre- and postoperative photographs showed a significant reduction in both nasofacial angle (7.76°, SD 4.30°) and rhinion angle (0.85°, SD 0.69°) (p < 0.0001). Patient-reported outcome scores with the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale decreased from 61.00 (SD 26.96) to 15.50 (SD 11.65), and Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey scores postoperatively were 10.90 (SD 7.71) overall, with the functional component at 3.50 (SD 2.64) and the aesthetic component at 7.40 (SD 6.24). No residual hump, recurrence of the hump, or complications were observed. Conclusion: In this study, the use of DPR techniques was effective and may support further development of the inclusion and exclusion criteria for its use in correcting the dorsal hump in Asian patients. Careful patient selection will be imperative to determine the ultimate indications for this technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对亚洲人的驼峰鼻缩小术--鼻背保留隆鼻术的可行性。
背景:鼻背保留整形术(DPR)在西方人中已显示出缩小鼻驼峰的前景,但其在亚洲人中的可行性和长期效果仍有待探索。研究目的测量 DPR 在亚洲驼峰鼻中的可行性以及功能和美学效果,并确定其在适应亚洲人口独特特征方面的有效性。方法:回顾性研究分析了 2019 年 4 月至 2022 年 11 月期间接受初级 DPR 的患者,随访时间超过 12 个月。研究对象包括照片符合标准的患者。对手术技术、使用人体测量因素进行的美学测量以及主观结果进行了评估。研究结果17 名患者(11/17,64.7% 为女性)的平均年龄为 22.53 岁(标准差 [SD] 5.22 岁)。中位随访时间为 36.90 个月(13-61 个月)。术前和术后照片的测量结果显示,鼻面角(7.76°,标准差 4.30°)和鼻孔角(0.85°,标准差 0.69°)均显著缩小(p < 0.0001)。患者报告的鼻阻塞症状评估量表结果评分从 61.00(标清 26.96)分降至 15.50(标清 11.65)分,术后标准化外观和健康鼻部结果调查总体评分为 10.90(标清 7.71)分,其中功能部分为 3.50(标清 2.64)分,美观部分为 7.40(标清 6.24)分。未发现残余驼峰、驼峰复发或并发症。结论在这项研究中,使用 DPR 技术是有效的,这有助于进一步制定亚洲患者驼背矫正的纳入和排除标准。要确定该技术的最终适应症,必须谨慎选择患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
期刊最新文献
Cost Comparison of Industry Versus In-House Three-Dimensional Printed Models for Microvascular Mandible Reconstruction. Intradermal Injection of Tranexamic Acid for the Treatment of Adult Melasma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Tranexamic Acid in Rhytidectomy: A Split-Face Multi-Institutional Study. Commentary on Von Sneidern et al's "Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Facial Palsy: Opportunities for Optimization at a Single Institution."-Bridging the Gap Between Guidelines and Practice. Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Facial Palsy: Opportunities for Optimization at a Single Institution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1