Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans MRI: A Preliminary Comparison of Different Sequences

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Medical Imaging Reviews Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0115734056307179240723075825
Kangjie Xu, Ziyuan Li, Wei Li, Jianxing Qiu, Hang Li, Yurong Li, Rui Peng
{"title":"Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans MRI: A Preliminary Comparison of Different Sequences","authors":"Kangjie Xu, Ziyuan Li, Wei Li, Jianxing Qiu, Hang Li, Yurong Li, Rui Peng","doi":"10.2174/0115734056307179240723075825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of different MRI sequences regarding the presentation of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected MRI images of 40 patients who had been pathologically diagnosed with DFSP, including 21 primary tumors and 19 recurrent tumors. The image quality of different MRI sequences was assessed subjectively by two radiologists, taking into account the display of the lesions, artifacts, and distortions, as well as the overall impact of the image quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 40 cases, 22 cases involved the trunk, 14 cases involved the shoulders and limbs, 2 cases involved the head and neck, 1 case involved the breast, and 1 case involved the groin. In terms of image quality, fat suppression T2-weighted images were superior to T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images (P<0.05). The difference between fat suppression T2-weighted images and contrast-enhanced images was not significant (P>0.05). As far as lesion contrast is concerned, diffusion-weighted images, fat suppression T2-weighted images, and contrast-enhanced images did not differ significantly (P>0.05). On the DWI images, there were severe magnetic artifacts and deformations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fat suppression T2-weighted images and enhanced sequences produce the highest quality images, while diffusion-weighted images provide the best lesion contrast.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056307179240723075825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of different MRI sequences regarding the presentation of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP).

Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected MRI images of 40 patients who had been pathologically diagnosed with DFSP, including 21 primary tumors and 19 recurrent tumors. The image quality of different MRI sequences was assessed subjectively by two radiologists, taking into account the display of the lesions, artifacts, and distortions, as well as the overall impact of the image quality.

Results: Among the 40 cases, 22 cases involved the trunk, 14 cases involved the shoulders and limbs, 2 cases involved the head and neck, 1 case involved the breast, and 1 case involved the groin. In terms of image quality, fat suppression T2-weighted images were superior to T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images (P<0.05). The difference between fat suppression T2-weighted images and contrast-enhanced images was not significant (P>0.05). As far as lesion contrast is concerned, diffusion-weighted images, fat suppression T2-weighted images, and contrast-enhanced images did not differ significantly (P>0.05). On the DWI images, there were severe magnetic artifacts and deformations.

Conclusions: Fat suppression T2-weighted images and enhanced sequences produce the highest quality images, while diffusion-weighted images provide the best lesion contrast.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮纤维肉瘤核磁共振成像:不同序列的初步比较。
研究目的本研究旨在比较不同核磁共振成像序列在皮纤维肉瘤(DFSP)表现方面的成像质量:我们回顾性地收集了40例经病理诊断为DFSP患者的磁共振成像,其中包括21例原发性肿瘤和19例复发性肿瘤。由两名放射科医生对不同核磁共振成像序列的图像质量进行主观评估,评估时考虑了病变显示、伪像和失真以及图像质量的整体影响:在 40 例病例中,22 例涉及躯干,14 例涉及肩部和四肢,2 例涉及头颈部,1 例涉及乳房,1 例涉及腹股沟。就图像质量而言,脂肪抑制 T2 加权图像优于 T1 加权图像和 T2 加权图像(P0.05)。就病变对比度而言,弥散加权图像、脂肪抑制 T2 加权图像和对比增强图像没有明显差异(P>0.05)。在 DWI 图像上,存在严重的磁伪影和变形:结论:脂肪抑制 T2 加权图像和增强序列产生的图像质量最高,而弥散加权图像提供的病灶对比度最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
期刊最新文献
Multiple Pulmonary Sclerosing Haemangiomas with a Cavity: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. An Integrated Approach using YOLOv8 and ResNet, SeResNet & Vision Transformer (ViT) Algorithms based on ROI Fracture Prediction in X-ray Images of the Elbow. Combination of Different Sectional Elastography Techniques with Age to Optimize the Downgrading of Breast BI-RAIDS Class 4a Nodules. Prenatal Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Diagnosis of Dural Sinus Arteriovenous Malformation: An Unusual Case Report. A Novel Invasive Weed Optimization and its Variant for the Detection of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1