When One Is Not Enough: Exploring the Intersection of Multiple Public Benefits and Multiple Material Hardships in Low-Income Single-Mother Families

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Family and Economic Issues Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s10834-024-09978-4
Chi-Fang Wu, Jeehae Kang, Soohyun Yoon, Steven Anderson
{"title":"When One Is Not Enough: Exploring the Intersection of Multiple Public Benefits and Multiple Material Hardships in Low-Income Single-Mother Families","authors":"Chi-Fang Wu, Jeehae Kang, Soohyun Yoon, Steven Anderson","doi":"10.1007/s10834-024-09978-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Families headed by single mothers face economic vulnerability, and many rely on multiple public benefit programs. This study explored multiple benefits program participation and its relationship with material hardship among low-income single-mother families in the United States. Using nationally representative data, we employed cluster analysis to explore patterns of multiple program participation in 10 benefits programs and used logistic regression to examine the relationships between program participation clusters and material hardship. Four program participation groups emerged: Many Benefits, Moderate Benefits, Only School Meal, and No Benefits. Material hardships (i.e., food hardship, medical hardship, unmet basic needs, housing hardship) were prevalent across all clusters. However, the Many Benefits group, which received the highest number of benefits, exhibited the highest rate of both food hardship (43.17%) and unmet basic needs (51.09%). Despite receiving more support than other groups, this group was more likely than the other groups to experience these hardships (except for medical hardship) that public benefits are designed to alleviate. This finding underscores the limitations of current social benefits and calls for policy revisions that enhance the amount, duration, and accessibility of public benefits to promote the well-being of the United States’ most vulnerable families.</p>","PeriodicalId":39675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-024-09978-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Families headed by single mothers face economic vulnerability, and many rely on multiple public benefit programs. This study explored multiple benefits program participation and its relationship with material hardship among low-income single-mother families in the United States. Using nationally representative data, we employed cluster analysis to explore patterns of multiple program participation in 10 benefits programs and used logistic regression to examine the relationships between program participation clusters and material hardship. Four program participation groups emerged: Many Benefits, Moderate Benefits, Only School Meal, and No Benefits. Material hardships (i.e., food hardship, medical hardship, unmet basic needs, housing hardship) were prevalent across all clusters. However, the Many Benefits group, which received the highest number of benefits, exhibited the highest rate of both food hardship (43.17%) and unmet basic needs (51.09%). Despite receiving more support than other groups, this group was more likely than the other groups to experience these hardships (except for medical hardship) that public benefits are designed to alleviate. This finding underscores the limitations of current social benefits and calls for policy revisions that enhance the amount, duration, and accessibility of public benefits to promote the well-being of the United States’ most vulnerable families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当一个人不够时:探索低收入单亲母亲家庭中多重公共福利与多重物质困难的交集
单亲母亲为户主的家庭面临着经济脆弱性,许多家庭依赖于多种公共福利计划。本研究探讨了美国低收入单亲母亲家庭的多重福利计划参与情况及其与物质困难之间的关系。通过使用具有全国代表性的数据,我们采用聚类分析来探讨 10 个福利项目的多重项目参与模式,并使用逻辑回归来研究项目参与聚类与物质困难之间的关系。结果发现有四个项目参与群组:多福利组、中等福利组、只有校餐组和无福利组。物质困难(即食物困难、医疗困难、基本需求得不到满足、住房困难)在所有组别中都很普遍。然而,获得福利最多的 "多福利 "组在食物困难(43.17%)和基本需求未得到满足(51.09%)方面的比例都最高。尽管该群体比其他群体获得了更多的支持,但与其他群体相比,该群体更有可能遇到公共福利旨在缓解的这些困难(医疗困难除外)。这一发现强调了当前社会福利的局限性,并呼吁对政策进行修订,提高公共福利的金额、期限和可及性,以促进美国最弱势家庭的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Journal of Family and Economic Issues is an interdisciplinary publication that explores the intricate relationship between the family and its economic environment. Peer-reviewed contributions address important issues in family management, household labor and productivity, relationships between economic and non-economic issues including health and healthcare, as well as interrelations between external settings and family life, including family policy, work, and community. The journal features the following types of submissions: original research, critical reviews, brief communications, invited letters to the editor, and reviews of significant books on the field.
期刊最新文献
Gendered Relationship of Childbearing with Earnings Accumulated by Midlife in Two Nordic Welfare States German Parents Attaining Intrapersonal Work-Family Balance While Implementing the 50/50-Split-Model with Their Partners Hide and Seek with Finances: Financial Infidelity and Financial Snooping in Relationships Status Seeking and Work-Family Conflicts: How the Pursuit of Wealth and Success Threatens Family Peace in 26 Countries The Will to Sustain Through Shocks, Wars and Crises: How the History of a Country Influences the Behaviour of the Family CEO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1