Fostering decent jobs, formalising informal employment and spurring job mobility in MENA countries

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS Economic Notes Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1111/ecno.12240
Philippe Adair, Shireen AlAzzawi, Vladimir Hlasny
{"title":"Fostering decent jobs, formalising informal employment and spurring job mobility in MENA countries","authors":"Philippe Adair,&nbsp;Shireen AlAzzawi,&nbsp;Vladimir Hlasny","doi":"10.1111/ecno.12240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Longstanding evidence in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries shows a high prevalence of unemployment and informality among a large fraction of population, and at the same time gender disparities in labour force participation and occupational mobility. Why is there such persistent labour-market segmentation? What is the impact and potential of various formalisation policies? An overview of the informal economy across three middle-income MENA countries (Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia) is provided with respect to taxonomy, coverage and drivers. Transition matrices and multinomial logistic regressions are applied to longitudinal microdata from Labour-Market Panel Surveys, focusing on workers' occupational mobility in relation to their previous status, age cohort, gender and other demographics. Persistent segmentation and low occupational mobility in all countries suggest that informal employment is not driven by choice on the labour supply side but by structural constraints on the demand side. Existing formalisation policies based on distinct stick and carrot strategies, and targeting of existing businesses and workers achieve rather modest impacts. One recommendation to supplement policies for decent jobs creation is to promote social and solidarity enterprises and extend microfinance to informal enterprises.</p>","PeriodicalId":44298,"journal":{"name":"Economic Notes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecno.12240","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecno.12240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Longstanding evidence in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries shows a high prevalence of unemployment and informality among a large fraction of population, and at the same time gender disparities in labour force participation and occupational mobility. Why is there such persistent labour-market segmentation? What is the impact and potential of various formalisation policies? An overview of the informal economy across three middle-income MENA countries (Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia) is provided with respect to taxonomy, coverage and drivers. Transition matrices and multinomial logistic regressions are applied to longitudinal microdata from Labour-Market Panel Surveys, focusing on workers' occupational mobility in relation to their previous status, age cohort, gender and other demographics. Persistent segmentation and low occupational mobility in all countries suggest that informal employment is not driven by choice on the labour supply side but by structural constraints on the demand side. Existing formalisation policies based on distinct stick and carrot strategies, and targeting of existing businesses and workers achieve rather modest impacts. One recommendation to supplement policies for decent jobs creation is to promote social and solidarity enterprises and extend microfinance to informal enterprises.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中东和北非国家促进体面工作,使非正规就业正规化,并刺激就业流动性
中东和北非(MENA)国家的长期证据表明,很大一部分人口失业率高、非正规性高,同时在劳动力参与和职业流动方面存在性别差异。为什么会出现这种持续的劳动力市场分割现象?各种正规化政策的影响和潜力如何?本报告从分类、覆盖范围和驱动因素等方面概述了中东和北非三个中等收入国家(埃及、约旦和突尼斯)的非正规经济。过渡矩阵和多项式逻辑回归适用于劳动力市场面板调查的纵向微观数据,重点关注工人的职业流动性与他们以前的身份、年龄组、性别和其他人口统计数据的关系。所有国家持续存在的细分和低职业流动性表明,非正规就业不是由劳动力供给方的选择驱动的,而是由需求方的结构性限制驱动的。现有的正规化政策以不同的大棒和胡萝卜战略为基础,以现有企业和工人为目标,取得的效果相当有限。为补充创造体面工作岗位的政策而提出的一项建议是,促进社会和团结企业的发展,并将小额信贷扩大到非正规企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Notes
Economic Notes ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: With articles that deal with the latest issues in banking, finance and monetary economics internationally, Economic Notes is an essential resource for anyone in the industry, helping you keep abreast of the latest developments in the field. Articles are written by top economists and executives working in financial institutions, firms and the public sector.
期刊最新文献
Financial inclusion, financial stability, and poverty reduction in Africa Will the real carbon pricing please stand up? On the connectedness of stock returns and exchange rates in emerging and frontier markets in Africa Impact of UK's social stock exchange trading scheme on the performance of social enterprises Are Indian markets insulated from the impact of cryptocurrencies? Unveiling the volatility linkages through multi-index dynamic multivariate GARCH analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1