Bringing Radical Assessment into Radical Political Economy: An Ungrading Experience

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of Radical Political Economics Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1177/04866134241261145
Smita Ramnarain, Anna Santucci
{"title":"Bringing Radical Assessment into Radical Political Economy: An Ungrading Experience","authors":"Smita Ramnarain, Anna Santucci","doi":"10.1177/04866134241261145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article shares an experience with an “ungrading” experience in a radical political economy course at the University of Rhode Island (URI). Using qualitative data in the form of student narratives gathered from their written work, we argue that this form of student assessment empowers students to deepen metacognition, fosters their resilience and self-awareness, and privileges principles such as cooperation, collaboration, and sharing in learning, in contrast to the individualized and competitive atmosphere conventional grading creates. Student narratives also point to ways in which ungrading allowed them to engage deeply with the world around, to examine their own lives and work in the context of capitalism, and to uncover possibilities for resistance and action. Thus, ungrading can provide an entry point into anti-capitalist assessment practices.JEL classification: A20, B14, B50","PeriodicalId":46719,"journal":{"name":"Review of Radical Political Economics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Radical Political Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134241261145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article shares an experience with an “ungrading” experience in a radical political economy course at the University of Rhode Island (URI). Using qualitative data in the form of student narratives gathered from their written work, we argue that this form of student assessment empowers students to deepen metacognition, fosters their resilience and self-awareness, and privileges principles such as cooperation, collaboration, and sharing in learning, in contrast to the individualized and competitive atmosphere conventional grading creates. Student narratives also point to ways in which ungrading allowed them to engage deeply with the world around, to examine their own lives and work in the context of capitalism, and to uncover possibilities for resistance and action. Thus, ungrading can provide an entry point into anti-capitalist assessment practices.JEL classification: A20, B14, B50
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将激进评估带入激进政治经济学:不分等级的经验
本文分享了罗德岛大学(URI)激进政治经济学课程中 "取消评分 "的经验。利用从学生书面作业中收集到的学生叙述形式的定性数据,我们认为这种形式的学生评价能增强学生深化元认知的能力,培养他们的应变能力和自我意识,并在学习中倡导合作、协作和分享等原则,与传统评分所营造的个人化和竞争氛围形成鲜明对比。在学生的叙述中,他们还指出,取消评分使他们能够深入参与周围的世界,在资本主义的背景下审视自己的生活和工作,并发现反抗和行动的可能性。因此,取消评分可以为反资本主义评估实践提供一个切入点:A20, B14, B50
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Review of Radical Political Economics (RRPE) promotes critical inquiry into all areas of economic, social, and political reality. As the journal of the Union for Radical Political Economics, RRPE publishes innovative research in political economy broadly defined including, but not confined to, Marxian economies, post-Keynesian economics, Sraffian economics, feminist economics, and radical institutional economics. We are actively seeking submissions concerned with policy, history of thought, and economics and the environment. RRPE reflects an interdisciplinary approach to the study, development, and application of radical political economic analysis to social problems.
期刊最新文献
Sovereign Credit Rating: Impact on Social Investment and Role in Financial Subordination From a Spoke to a Hub: The Case of South Korea Debate as a Pedagogical Tool for Pluralist Economics Education Abstracts Chinese September 2024 Abstracts Spanish September 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1