Negotiations on food security at the WTO: a never-ending story?

Joseph A. McMahon
{"title":"Negotiations on food security at the WTO: a never-ending story?","authors":"Joseph A. McMahon","doi":"10.1108/jitlp-03-2024-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose is to chart the negotiations on the issue of food security which was identified as a non-trade concern by the Agreement on Agriculture (AOA) and how developing Members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) suggested that that concern should be addressed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The history of negotiations at the WTO is examined through the lens of official documents submitted during various phases of negotiations since 1996 beginning with the Analysis and Information Exchange process to the Doha Round up to the latest Ministerial Conference in Abu Dhabi in February 2024.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The negotiations have yet to complete despite beginning over 20 years ago. The focus moved since 2008 to look at specific issues which were addressed at a number of Ministerial Conferences but the latest of these indicate that an answer can only be found in the re-negotiation of the AOA as a whole.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>By focusing on official documents, the rich literature on food security has not been addressed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The piece concludes by looking at issues which need to be resolved ahead of agreement on overall reform and suggests solutions for example in the area of safeguards and public stockholding for food security purposes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The focus almost exclusively on official (and public) documents during the discussion is noteworthy. It also confirms that the WTO is not really that different from its predecessor - the GATT - which took nearly 50 years to reach AOA.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jitlp-03-2024-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose is to chart the negotiations on the issue of food security which was identified as a non-trade concern by the Agreement on Agriculture (AOA) and how developing Members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) suggested that that concern should be addressed.

Design/methodology/approach

The history of negotiations at the WTO is examined through the lens of official documents submitted during various phases of negotiations since 1996 beginning with the Analysis and Information Exchange process to the Doha Round up to the latest Ministerial Conference in Abu Dhabi in February 2024.

Findings

The negotiations have yet to complete despite beginning over 20 years ago. The focus moved since 2008 to look at specific issues which were addressed at a number of Ministerial Conferences but the latest of these indicate that an answer can only be found in the re-negotiation of the AOA as a whole.

Research limitations/implications

By focusing on official documents, the rich literature on food security has not been addressed.

Practical implications

The piece concludes by looking at issues which need to be resolved ahead of agreement on overall reform and suggests solutions for example in the area of safeguards and public stockholding for food security purposes.

Originality/value

The focus almost exclusively on official (and public) documents during the discussion is noteworthy. It also confirms that the WTO is not really that different from its predecessor - the GATT - which took nearly 50 years to reach AOA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世贸组织粮食安全谈判:永无止境的故事?
设计/方法/途径通过自 1996 年以来各谈判阶段提交的正式文件,对世贸组织的谈判历史进行了研究,从分析和信息交流进程开始,到多哈回合谈判,直至 2024 年 2 月在阿布扎比举行的最近一次部长级会议。自 2008 年以来,重点转移到了一些部长级会议上讨论的具体问题上,但最新的部长级会议表明,只有重新谈判整个《农产品协议》才能找到答案。实践意义文章最后探讨了在就整体改革达成一致之前需要解决的问题,并提出了解决方案,例如在保障措施和为粮食安全目的的公共储备方面。这也证明,世贸组织与其前身关贸总协定(GATT)并无本质区别,后者花了近 50 年时间才达成《农产品协议》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Trade Law and Policy is a peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal with a focus upon the nexus of international economic policy and international economic law. It is receptive, but not limited, to the methods of economics, law, and the social sciences. As scholars tend to read individual articles of particular interest to them, rather than an entire issue, authors are not required to write with full accessibility to readers from all disciplines within the purview of the Journal. However, interdisciplinary communication should be fostered where possible. Thus economists can utilize quantitative methods (including econometrics and statistics), while legal scholars and political scientists can invoke specialized techniques and theories. Appendices are encouraged for more technical material. Submissions should contribute to understanding international economic policy and the institutional/legal architecture in which it is implemented. Submissions can be conceptual (theoretical) and/or empirical and/or doctrinal in content. Topics of interest to the Journal are expected to evolve over time but include: -All aspects of international trade law and policy -All aspects of international investment law and policy -All aspects of international development law and policy -All aspects of international financial law and policy -Relationship between economic policy and law and other societal concerns, including the human rights, environment, health, development, and national security
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Indonesia halal tourism policy in light of GATS Bilateral investment treaties and investors’ social accountability: the law and praxis in South Asia A shadowy negotiation involving dams and its fiscal and legal implications: a Portuguese case study Negotiations on food security at the WTO: a never-ending story? Is South Asia the missing bloc in world trade? An analysis of South Asian FTAs’ compatibility with WTO rules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1